The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

[pauldude000]

Even when you are told that your pulses are crap you refuse to accept it.  Go ahead and drown in your self-gratifying BS.

Yes, grumpy, you are the master, the authority, the one guru here whom has complete and infallible understanding of all you survey. Your understanding of Tesla's works has relegated you into the position of religious leader for all Teslites.

You keep claiming that I misquote Tesla, yet you only repeat the hearsay and BS on the web about him.

All anyone has to do is go back in this very thread to discover that, concerning Tesla's own definition of radiant energy, his words were quoted, YOU stated his words incorrect. 

They were quoted directly from his own patent dealing with the subject, not just some "BS" on the web. Nice try, or should I say nice foot in mouth.. 

Come on Paul, try to prove me wrong.  You can't.  If you had any sense you would listen to every word I say and apply it, but you never will.

Concerning the wave phenomena, you were the only one right, which was VERY surprising. However, it changes nothing, as you would understand if you bothered to understand my initial posts. I SAID it was common. Now, you actually did post the common term for a common effect. You want a star? To quote you, "Whoop-de-dooo".

No kidding that a common effect has a common term also associated with it. 

I have sense, and now I intend to refuse to respond to your posts which are "attitudinal", to use slang.

You could get rid of the neg pulses, clamp the crap out of the pos one (to raise them way above zero) and use them to excite a third coil - wa-la - RE coming out your ass.  But you won't even try cause you think we're all full of crap.

Why, when SM stated this device works off of magnetic fields, should I be concerned with RE?

You have also in the hubbard coil thread stated a position of mine wrong because of harmonics, and you referred as proof to the "magnifying transmitter" as proof. The only problem is that there is no evidence whatsoever linking the TPU tech with the magnifying transmitter tech. NONE. 

I'll keep trying to help you a little longer, but I am tiring.

I already stated I am tired of this, and more than hinted that your refusal to attempt to communicate with me is fine, actually more than just merely fine, it is desirable.

You made a rediculous statement to MIB and now you accuse Poynt99 and myself of being MIB?  Hillarious.
Allright - all BS and joking aside.  Let's move on.

I didn't say you were MIB, just that it is a possibility. I stated quite clearly that I assume you are POSERS. However, without proof nothing is truly ruled out, since what you do has the same overall effect..

About the differentiation, see attached image - notice the pulses coincide with the transitions of the square wave?  The top image is double differentiation - notice the pulse is tighter but you get a quick reversal at each pulse?

Good going.... You figured it out.

Now explain it, how it affects fields within the circuit, how it affects current flow, etc......

Paul Andrulis

[pauldude000]

@Grumpy

Differentiation has NOTHING to do with op-amps?? (In what universe?)

Search Term:  differentiation op-amps
Search Engine: Yahoo
Results: 23700

But then again, I suppose you wouldn't listen to people like National Semiconductors, or how about this link to a college site:

http://www.ee.nmt.edu/~wedeward/EE212L/SP03/lab07.html

I believe that quoting you, I just "made your day punk"........

No more of this garbage. I will not respond further. You are speaking to the air.

Paul Andrulis

[pauldude000]

Three pages almost completely wasted......... and worse, a monumental waste of my time and effort, except for maybe a few....

[Grumpy]

I like you, Paul!  You have salt - moxy - Grumption!  LOL! 

Attitudinal - now we are getting somewhere!  Come on Paul - room for two on a ten foot board - Whooo-hooo!!!

In reference to Tesla's patents for radiant energy - I'll clarify something for your benefit.  The sun spouts out huge quantities of RE - Tesla discovered how to produce this effect himself.  Look at the subsequent patents.

Have you ever seen Naudin's replication of Dollard's TEM - LMD demonstration?  Notice that the LMD circuit looks very much like a balanced high pass filter - only difference is the extra inductors.  What travels faster than EM?  LMD - Ding ding ding - we have a winner...

Explain the differentiated pulse - in what frame of reference.   I told you how to use it.  Does it matter how it works?  Hell, those little Grey Dudes don't even know what an electron is and they are all over the damn Galaxy.  All they know is that it works.

G

Yes, grumpy, you are the master, the authority, the one guru here whom has complete and infallible understanding of all you survey. Your understanding of Tesla's works has relegated you into the position of religious leader for all Teslites.

All anyone has to do is go back in this very thread to discover that, concerning Tesla's own definition of radiant energy, his words were quoted, YOU stated his words incorrect. 

They were quoted directly from his own patent dealing with the subject, not just some "BS" on the web. Nice try, or should I say nice foot in mouth.. 

Concerning the wave phenomena, you were the only one right, which was VERY surprising. However, it changes nothing, as you would understand if you bothered to understand my initial posts. I SAID it was common. Now, you actually did post the common term for a common effect. You want a star? To quote you, "Whoop-de-dooo".

No kidding that a common effect has a common term also associated with it. 

I have sense, and now I intend to refuse to respond to your posts which are "attitudinal", to use slang.


Why, when SM stated this device works off of magnetic fields, should I be concerned with RE?

You have also in the hubbard coil thread stated a position of mine wrong because of harmonics, and you referred as proof to the "magnifying transmitter" as proof. The only problem is that there is no evidence whatsoever linking the TPU tech with the magnifying transmitter tech. NONE. 

I already stated I am tired of this, and more than hinted that your refusal to attempt to communicate with me is fine, actually more than just merely fine, it is desirable.


I didn't say you were MIB, just that it is a possibility. I stated quite clearly that I assume you are POSERS. However, without proof nothing is truly ruled out, since what you do has the same overall effect..

Good going.... You figured it out.

Now explain it, how it affects fields within the circuit, how it affects current flow, etc......

Paul Andrulis

[Grumpy]

Differentiation has NOTHING to do with op-amps?? (In what universe?)

You never even hear of a differentiator before I mentioned it - Mr. Extranious Cranial Capacity. 

A "passive differentiator circuit" (no op-amp in your circuit is there? no active components?) is usually a series capacitor and a shunt resistor. (See attached.)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passive_differentiator_circuit

Ooooh - that right was like a sledge hammer - so take a knee and look it up again - Mr. Sherlock.

G

You are speaking to the air.

Not the "Air" - I am speaking to an idiot! - LOL!!!!