Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations

Started by Pirate88179, April 09, 2008, 09:43:54 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 19 Guests are viewing this topic.

the_big_m_in_ok

jeanna said:
Quote
...They would not grant him a patent unless it was a galvanic battery, which it was not. ...
Seems plausible.  But, then, can an ordinary transformer be used instead of a NS coil arrangement?

Quote
So, every reference to it being a galvanic battery needs to be erased, and the whole business about putting it in a jar is added for the patent examiner too, and should be disregarded.
That was the part which was confusing.  I had the idea Stubblefield wanted it buried for that reason.

Quote
Please see my advice to protonmom about the stake in the ground and not burying it.
Good. I'll remember that.

Quote
Yup
The load is off the secondary. He says a load can be off the primary but that is in the galvanic part.
Both can be used?  Will Stubblefield's invention work as he described it?  Can yours approach his complexity in design and 1) work effectively or 2) be more efficient?

Quote
Well, ya gotta use something. I am using more wire than before because I had such little galvanic action from the earth before, and I was using 24 gauge tele wire single strand. bill was using 14 gauge hook up wire, which I am using for the 9 foot apart probes in the ground EB.
Maybe if I have the time, freedom and enough money, I might try the EB + the NS generator + the extended antenna(a la Moray) to see which works best.

--Lee
"Truth comes from wisdom and wisdom comes from experience."
--Valdemar Valerian from the Matrix book series

I'm merely a theoretical electronics engineer/technician for now, since I have no extra money for experimentation, but I was a professional electronics/computer technician in the past.
As a result, I have a lot of ideas, but no hard test results to back them up---for now.  That could change if I get a job locally in the Bay Area of California.

oscar

Hi protonmom,
thanks for your reply.
Quote from: protonmom on August 13, 2009, 10:31:44 AM
.... fe galvanized wire, and cu romex.  The romex cu was wrapped in cotton sheet strips. 
Not knowing what romex means, I looked it up.
http://homerenovations.about.com/od/electrical/a/artromexnm.htm
Did you remove the original plastic insulation of the romex wire before you wrapped it in cotton or did you leave the plastic insulation in place?

About the compass experiment:
Normally the core/coil (with 5&6 shorted, i.e. current flowing) should have a magnetic north pole end with the other end being a south pole.
I wanted to determine which end is which?
On my coil (wound as in NS's drawing) the top seems to be the south pole, but due to the weak magnetization I am not sure.
Quote from: protonmom on August 13, 2009, 10:31:44 AM
If I hold the compass in front of the top of the core it points away from the core.
That seems to confirm my compass readings, i.e. top end of coil is a south pole.

Looking forward to the paperclip result.

And:
Are the voltage and current readings still as high today as they were when you took the photos?
Sorry for all the questions, but the values of your coil are really fantastic
The transmission was a '53 (Johnny Cash)

protonmom

Here is something interesting:
I tested the paper clip and if I connected the 10's the clip was repelled.  If I connected the 5 and 6 the clip was attracted to the core.  If I held the clip over the ends of core (either one) without letting the core grab the clip the clip would spin...first in one direction and then the other.  I found if I held the clip about 1/2 inch above either end it would spin (not just above the core).
If I held it above the wrapped core it would also spin but not as fast as above the end core.  Now get this...  I took the whole shebang and got it wet again.  Brought it out and without tying any ends together.....it is still magnetic.  Why is that?  I thought the 5 and 6 had to be connected for it to be magnetic.  What did I do?

protonmom

Oscar, Yes I patiently stripped the insulation off the electric wire....and stripped and stripped.  I used an old paring knife.  It wasn't too bad but wish I had an easier way.
If I understand magnetism right, if the needle points to the north it is the south end and vice versa.  The magnetic waves travel from the south to the north. 
If I am mistaken, someone correct me on this.

protonmom

Oscar, let me wait a few minutes and then I will re-check the coil for the dmm readings.  (I just now took it out of the bath so want to let it drip a bit longer)  Will get back to you shortly.