Feynman makes a Bedini Motor

[utilitarian]

show us your charge monitoring circuit utilitarian... what is its power usage?
mechanical motor? please elaborate, what is its draw? i'm sure you have the bistro math for how much energy the motor will consume moving large heavy lead acid batteries...

what, no?  hmmmm.

I do not have the burden of proof.  The person claiming overunity does.  Everyone claiming overunity from a non-continuous device makes some lame excuse or another for why the device will not run perpetually.  I am pointing out why this is so ridiculous.  The bottom line is if you have extra energy, you can close the loop somehow, always.  If you do not have extra energy, that is a problem.

Do you think the Bedini is overunity?  I suspect you do not (very few people do, even in the OU community) and so I do not even see why you are arguing this.

[WilbyInebriated]

LOL as i said before show some proof of someone claiming over unity...

[WilbyInebriated]

and burden of proof was not even mentioned... even though you did make a claim of "this is how to close the loop, blah blah use MY method..." i simply asked you for a precise accounting of how much energy your "add-ons" were going to cost us. this is logical. we require it to "pass logical muster"... yes twist and distract but you never put up when asked directly do you? come to think of it you never shut up either...

[WilbyInebriated]

None of what you said addresses what I said.  If you think the Bedini is overunity, then it should be very easy to set up a perpetual motion machine, using the method I outlined.  Just use a single Bedini motor and multiple sets of batteries.  At the conclusion of a particular charge, use the charged battery to activate a mechanical motor which will swap a new set of batteries into the device.  Repeat ad infinitum.  Rotate flat and charged batteries around as needed, and siphon off extra electricity into other batteries or external sources (using something other than the Bedini wheel).  Repeat ad infinitum.

show us your charge monitoring circuit utilitarian... what is its power usage?
mechanical motor? please elaborate, what is its draw? i'm sure you have the bistro math for how much energy the motor will consume moving large heavy lead acid batteries...

what, no?  hmmmm.

I do not have the burden of proof.  The person claiming overunity does.  Everyone claiming overunity from a non-continuous device makes some lame excuse or another for why the device will not run perpetually.  I am pointing out why this is so ridiculous.  The bottom line is if you have extra energy, you can close the loop somehow, always.  If you do not have extra energy, that is a problem.

Do you think the Bedini is overunity?  I suspect you do not (very few people do, even in the OU community) and so I do not even see why you are arguing this.

none of what you said addresses what i said. 

shall i point out more of why you are ridiculous?

[utilitarian]

and burden of proof was not even mentioned... even though you did make a claim of "this is how to close the loop, blah blah use MY method..." i simply asked you for a precise accounting of how much energy your "add-ons" were going to cost us. this is logical. we require it to "pass logical muster"... yes twist and distract but you never put up when asked directly do you? come to think of it you never shut up either...

Burden of proof is implicitly mentioned - you are asking for specific calculations, which I am under no obligation to provide.  I have pointed out how weak the excuses were for not making a perpetually-spinning Bedini, given the claim that the device is overunity.  The person defending the overunity aspect of the device has repeatedly put forth lame reasons why the loop cannot be closed, and I am exploring the lengths to which these "researchers" even bothered to try.

After all, no defense would be needed, if they could just show a perpetually running device.  But no, they have to resort to a convoluted explanation of why it won't run. I say, baloney!

And if you cannot realize that moving a pair of batteries sideways on a smooth surface on smooth rollers is a trivial task, I cannot help you.