Science contradicts itself..Questions

[rangerover444]

Because of electricity

Electricity as you know is a flow of two magnetic currents in the opposite directions.
It’s easy to calculate that in order to push an electron through a wire at 20 Amp’s and
220 volts, you need to inject Gamma Rays from the source side of the wire.
Well you cannot calculate it with the term we have (Watts, Volts, Amps, etc.) since
we use these units to calculate back the amount of energy and not checking the
source of the power that drives electricity, since we have no units for that…well sorry,
we have magnetic field which can do the job at much less cost. Some athletic abilities,
like pushing, pulling, spiraling (right hand rule), orbiting, poles forming, will make them
good candidates. Also then we need to start with new units, although it will cross some
measurements and calculations we made.

If electricity is two opposing magnetic currents then they attract each other from a head
of place literally effortless (have you seen any sweating bar magnet from pushing or pulling…LOL).
Although they are also pushed from behind by the pressure of the same monopole’s current,
but that energy quickly replaced by the pull from the other side. That’s the easy way electricity
runs, no need for accelerating rockets behind….LOL

A short reminder what we never detected in magnets :  runs as stream of particles, the
particles have either North or South pole (monopoles), can run in different combinations
(opposite, parallel, etc.), and many other features, and that not impossible…

Funny thing about the electron, that is not even a measured unit, since it was invented so
we could measure it and give it life and validity. No wonder we were the first couture
to find it….and even call it a name…..
Now frankly, there is no one reading these lines that is not convinced that electricity is
real, powerful and drives our lives, I too believes like that, but I’m not sure the juice is electrons.

Nothing personal, just thoughts…

Cheers

[Koen1]

potato potato,
tomato tomato,

as Shakespeare wrote
"What's in a name? That which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet."



And was it not the Greeks who invented the word "Electron",
used it as the name for the alloy of gold and silver?

nonetheless I do agree, that the assumption of the particle called
"electron", as an electric monopole particle, is only backed by
observations of its movement and effects of said movement,
and not by true observations of the particles themselves.
But then again, neither is any other particle.
And I hardly hear people complain about that...

[PYRODIN123321]

as Shakespeare wrote
"What's in a name? That which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet."

And was it not the Greeks who invented the word "Electron",
used it as the name for the alloy of gold and silver?

I love the smell of fresh picked electrons.

btw: who did invent the word electron? just curious

[Koen1]

Lol

Well, er... It was, like I said, the Greeks.
I was just wrong about the exact meaning:
Elektron was the ancient Greek word for Amber,
which when rubbed over animal fur becomes negatively
charged and attracts smaller positively charged particles.
The Greeks already knew this. But it wasn't until 1890 or
so that the Irish physicist George Stoney used and coined
the name electron for a particle carrying a negative
electric charge.

The alloy of gold and silver is called Elektrum.

[PYRODIN123321]

Ahhh....so the greeks named it, homeboy Stoney made it popular- got it


...... Elektrum.......I like the sound of that word......sounds like the name of a band

and now put your hands together for

"ELEKTRUM"