Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Young Bangladeshi Scientist's success story Power generation without fuel

Started by steve_chow, April 20, 2008, 03:59:21 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Grumpy

Quote from: Bobbotov on June 25, 2008, 12:27:38 PM
Yeah they do. You know nothing about either.

Keep thinking that - like you're even capable of making that detemination.

What has been now?  Three or four years? You still talk the same smack.  Wasting your mind.  Pennies knows he's wrong - he just doesn't give a crap - he's here for a debate to make is day go by faster - another waste of a mind.
It is the men of insight and the men of unobstructed vision of every generation who are able to lead us through the quagmire of a in-a-rut thinking. It is the men of imagination who are able to see relationships which escape the casual observer. It remains for the men of intuition to seek answers while others avoid even the question.
                                                                                                                                    -Frank Edwards

Bobbotov

Quote from: Grumpy on June 25, 2008, 12:45:08 PM


What has been now?  Three or four years? You still talk the same smack. 

I have no idea what you are talking about. But that has been true through the whole thread so no surprise. Good online name. Was Dopey already taken?

jibbguy

@Pennies: Since you have no real answers, just tap-dance moves with nothing to back them.... it would appear you are the one lost in a sea of reason... And the sharks are circling ;)

The heat energy CREATED by compression comes from "nowhere" at least in terms of 1867 pre-atomic theory. Any inference to the contrary is added by those who only are wishing the CoE Law covered it as a means of protecting their world-view; but they have absolutely nothing to prove this statement, and so instead endlessly repeat dogmatic denials that are meaningless. Imo, heat from compression is the crack in the Law that will allow other cracks to be someday admitted and examined, finally.

Underground coupling would be "impossible" by accepted transverse EM theory... If you were a "Tesla expert", you would know that Wardenclyffe had little to do with transverse EM coupling; "Traditional" wireless radio was just the "cover story" that was put out after the fact to help suppress what was really being tried there. Underground radio reception and other subterranean "non-transverse EM" energy-related phenomena like power transmission through the ground is a topic that has been dodged and hushed-up by mainstream science for over 100 years. The Navy may have utilized it, but they won't address the strange anomalies it represents (at least openly).

Because Pennies, here is the logic trap you are in: If resonance and coupling were used by Tesla as the primary means of transmitting non-transverse EM, "radiant", energy... Then your world is officially rocked ;)
___________________________

To believe everything that exists is explainable by current means and neatly fits within a stated scientific model may be comforting... But it is risky: The chances of being proved wrong, over and over again, grow every day.... As long as mainstream science remains locked in frozen dogma and unwilling to accept the possibility of their own failure (...not a very scientific method, is it?).

Therefor, dis'ing this possibly very brave and ingenious Bangladeshi scientist without anything to back you is not only wrong and prone to failure, it is unscientific. Don't believe it until you see it; that's fine and proper. But don't automatically discount it, either. This mental mindset is more important than just a mysterious invention in a far-off place: Breaking the knee-jerk negative attitudes is what will be required to finally get "free energy" and other suppressed technologies and medical treatments into the mainstream.

Grumpy

Quote from: Bobbotov on June 25, 2008, 12:49:34 PM
Was Dopey already taken?

Isn't "Dopey" what Bobbotov means?  Not sure of the language, Swahili perhaps.

Hey, I see from this post of your's that you do accept the possibility of "discoveries" - so hope is still in sight.
It is the men of insight and the men of unobstructed vision of every generation who are able to lead us through the quagmire of a in-a-rut thinking. It is the men of imagination who are able to see relationships which escape the casual observer. It remains for the men of intuition to seek answers while others avoid even the question.
                                                                                                                                    -Frank Edwards

poynt99

this argument is being unnecessarily complicated

it comes down to making claims and backing them up with more than just talk

if tomorrow someone posts on this forum that they have figured out the TPU and have seen all the effects described by SM, including the great output power from "nowhere", would the members here believe it without question, or would they request proper proof?

i would hope the latter

if proof is not provided, then either they don't really have what they claim, or they are holding out. i really think it is no more complicated than that, for me anyway
question everything, double check the facts, THEN decide your path...

Simple Cheap Low Power Oscillators V2.0
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=248
Towards Realizing the TPU V1.4: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=217
Capacitor Energy Transfer Experiments V1.0: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=209