Roll on the 20th June

[ramset]

B ASS sorry I have lost confidence in modern math as it applies to my check book    calculations have there place but seem to have an agenda   sometimes      how come the 1937 dodge [ 4 door tank]got 22-25 mpg in popular mechanics add 71 FREEKING YEARS AGO  your math /ideas keep um      unless you have a contribution keep your mental farts to your self    this man does not need your[sideways] help  he knows how to do this and is teaching  not learning  [as far as this rendition]  I need his help !!!!    Chet   PS and I like to play with toys

[PwrDream]

ok... I've read through the forum.... read your attempt at "blonde wife" instructions.... I even went to your site to get your  "Instructions".... I'm sorry if I offend you with this statement, but your written verbal skills leave something to be desired. 

I would be completely and utterly amazed if anyone in the world but you would be able to recreate your device based on you rambling stream of thoughts you call "Instructions".  Where I come from, "Instructions" are organized and easy to follow, like a good recipe.
First, you list the ingredients, in exact or nearly as exact proportions as possible.  Then you lay out, step by step, how to slap the item together (insert TAB b into SLOT A).  I know I can follow directions.  Heck... I?m sure everyone in this forum has had to assemble pre-fabricated furniture such as an office desk as some point.  If your device is as simple to build as you are stating, can you tell me of one person in the world that has been able to follow your instructions and replicate your creations?  Has anyone in this forum really been able to read Archer's "Instructions" and exclaim "Oooooo!  I get it now... it's simple!".  My gut tells me no.

Come on Archer... I would love to see you take the anger and bitterness out of your writing and simply put down, in one coherent post, the recipe necessary to replicate your discovery.  If you?re having trouble translating your thoughts to simple A B C instructions, I suggest contacting someone from the local press in your area, let them visually witness you building a toy version of the device, and have them use their writing skills to lay down some REAL instructions.

If anyone totally get's his instructions, please consider posting a translation that any average mechanic could follow.... 

The balls in your court.... fire away at my ignorance and lack of a brain if you like... but if you do decide to reply to this message, make sure to ask this question "Is there anyone out there who understands my instructions enough to be able to easily replicate my device?"  Give me the name of that person and how I might contact them, and I will give you my sincerest apology... 

By the way? I really hope that when June 20th rolls around, you?re a great success and your work helps solve the energy problems of the world?. I also hope I win the lottery, but I?m not holding my breath for that one either?.

PwrDream

[ramset]

SO i  guess this is more like a sporting event for some    a bunch of paper tigers     how about a contribution  an idea along the lines of what Archer's device is  like  @Bourne  @ Abrillo  @ Helmut  maybe Caphook etc etc   trying to get there minds around it with out stupid non productive babble  Be part of the solution not the problem    Chet

[Rusty_Springs]

Hi All
I feel dumb here it seams to me the only time this system is unbalanced and will rotate is when you add energy in this case with an electromagnet, knowing that extra energy is needed to make it spin tells me its not OU, if it was OU wouldn't it spin or stay unbalanced with out adding extra energy, its not always unbalanced its only unbalanced when you turn on the electromagnet.
If I see a working model that doesn't need extra energy like and electromagnet then I would think theres something special there until then all I see is another electromagnetic motor that proberly uses more added energy then the one I showed earlier in the forum.
Take Care All
Graham

[helmut]

SO i  guess this is more like a sporting event for some    a bunch of paper tigers     how about a contribution  an idea along the lines of what Archer's device is  like  @Bourne  @ Abrillo  @ Helmut  maybe Caphook etc etc   trying to get there minds around it with out stupid non productive babble  Be part of the solution not the problem    Chet

Today i did some test with magnets,that i have here at home.
I was able to reproduce the satellite effect as far,as i put some magnets inside a transparent pipe and hold it over a stack of other magnets,so that they repell the rotormagnets anl led them levitate iside the pipe.In addition to that setup i hold another stack magnets as statormagnets at about 12 o?clock and led the Rotormagnetpipe tilt to about 3 o?clock and can clearly feel,that the rotorpipe is shifted to the end of the rotor-mounting-pipe.Tomorrow i will add a axle to fix the Rotor on a fulcrum.
Then i will try out some test with ferromagnets and neomagnets to compare.
This is all on a small scale.
But today i spend also some time on the website from our magnet shop,to do some calculation.
One interesting aspect is to use ferromagnets in a ring shape as rotormagnets,because they have a own weight from someting around 250 grams. Each might cost about 2 euros. At the Moment i think instead of adding extra  weight to the wheel,it might be economic to use 4 Magnets as stack on the arm.This brings about 6 kilos to the rotor.Each arm will hafe a weight more then 2 kilograms.
The statormagnet on the base should be able to lift at least 4 kilos i think.The statormagnet on top should have some less power,that the rotor will not stick on it.

I hope,that tomorrow,i can provide more results.

helmut