Roll on the 20th June

[ramset]

Johnagain ahh the mindset positive vibes   LOTS of folks hoping he succeeds   Faith? HOPE? Necessity is the mother of invention  the right guy is on the job   A lol has changed since he arrived here   the snowball is rolling  Chet

[The Eskimo Quinn]

@ Hook

I am simply removing all personal comments good or bad the original information will also be deleted when the download is up.

Nothing but science and engineering, no personal remarks will remain. many people do not see this site so they are pointless and have no context to understand for many others.

As to you knowledge of electromagnets, i am sure it is good, but your knowledge of physics and math is poor, so it would seem you reading skills of the last few pages.

an electromagnet not proving the full power of the machine 50 percent powered by the rods own ability to lift itself, means that you electromagnet has more power than it is providing, if the lift is one kilo and only 50 percent of that is electro magnet then the fall is twice the input.

again for those who do not read.

an electromagnet lifting a i kilo steel rod uses  at x power a power of say 2, an electromagnet lifting a i kilo rod that has magnets on the end the same power as the electromagnets mean the lift at x will only require a power level of 1 or half.

to test this theory as a proof please take a i kilo block and lift with one permanent magnet now attach a magnet to the top and it will lift a greater weight or the same weight over a greater distance, as the magnet on the rod/block provides an additional power. this is undisputed in magnetism. Every single person who has already build wheels with rods will tell you the lift/power alters by the magnets on the rods from the arcs, proving that the rods supply there own power above that of the arcs, had the rods only been steel. My point and proof was replicated months ago, if the ekctromagnet lifts one kilo and rops one kilo straight down or over a cruve there is unity, power out for power in (less friction) if there is more power with the same weight and same input from the elctromagnet from the rods having magnetic ends, then there must be overunity, especially at 5O percent. Why do you think purepower goes with this? becauseeit is basic math

you have poor physics skills and math skills.

end trans.

[capthook]

"an electromagnet lifting a i kilo steel rod uses  at x power a power of say 2, an electromagnet lifting a i kilo rod that has magnets on the end the same power as the electromagnets mean the lift at x will only require a power level of 1 or half."

Yes - of course that is true.  You can achieve 2 any number of ways.  2+0 / 1+1 / .5+1.5 etc..
And what is the purpose of the electromagnet?  To eliminate the wall by turning it on and off.
2+0=2.  Now you say lets do it with 1/2 electromag and 1/2 perm. mag.  1+1=2
The problem now is - you have re-introduced a wall with the perm. mag. that you were trying to
eliminate in the first place with the electromag.
So no - I don't dispute you need 1/2 the power to the electromag with the perm. mag in place also.
But you will lose that 1/2 power reduction overcoming the wall now introduced by the perm. mag.
ie. 2+0=2 / 1+1=2 etc etc..
Conservation of energy is a BITCH!
Just another example of how your pieces and parts don't add up to the whole.

...but gravity will.....and momentum will....and torque will etc..etc.
all of that is a shell game playing 'hide the bitch of conservation'

And you said you know your machine so well you can make it do anything.
Only 1 thing everyone here wants to see for 5 months now and counting....
you showing the anything of perpetual motion.
Someone asked the parameters.  Mine: 9 min.... that should be easy if its PM
(and independant verification as we've seen how easy a video is to fake  )

[The Eskimo Quinn]

soory there is no wall when the rods are fired at the entre of the switch only entry or exit, an yes clever inlcuing iso ferrite  there are many items that are istropic that have no magnetic properties when switched off.

you really need to build something so you even have an understanding of what the wall is, magnet off there is no wall.

the prmanent mags exercise was to show people at home the lift power with and and without mags on rods. on the wheel there is only perms on rods with no wall to hit if there is an elctro mag.

Have a nice day

in fact as much as i hate to say it, had the arms on rusty's use of the single pulse electromag only failed, because the arms did not move so there was no lift gained from the arms, get a rod and a maget attected to each other but prevet them from hitting, all the xtra energy gets wasted from the huge torque now running through the wheel "because the arm cannot move" if it s repulsion pulse the effect is the same in reverse. enegry is provided but lost to torque. Grab a pair of stilson or a pipe wrecnh and put it on a pipe fence and try to truning, by hand or with some form of petrol engine, tons of energy and power, but nothing moves, the energy really does just vanish to the human eye, all lost to tension torque, dispersed as heat and vibration.

I left home and school at 13, you should feel embarresed, after all you are the eductaed one are you not? yet it is i giving you basic physics lesson.

Say you misunderstood, and you get to walk away. Don't and others with eductaions who do understand physics may start in on you also.

[queue]

AQ's comment wrt. "magnet motor video" on (YouTube):
AQ's (removed) comment:
Hmm, Archer recognizes a (faked) video on YT as a well done replication....

And the magnet configuration (yes, the stator and levitating rotor magnets, which is - btw - one of the most popular arrangements with Neos for years) as being - The Mayernik Array (which we all know is his discovery)...

>>..you not see nothing like The Mighty Quinn...<<

lol