Roll on the 20th June

[exxcomm0n]

My position still remains that Archer will not live up to what is expected.

If I did, I would not be providing constructive criticism; instead, I would just be another cheerleader.

....and you're allowed to man, just as he is.
Everybody gets the same opportunity, or nobody does.

It's just that here, things can still work like that.

It seems like no one wants to talk about the wheel until the 20th. It seems more like this is a discussion about Archer, not Archer's device(s). Once people are done stroking Archer's or their own egos, of like to continue to talk about solutions to our energy crisis.

-PurePower

Bullshit.

The world doesn't stop waiting for Archers release, the next day will come.
Even now with the new designs we're already trying to pick them apart.
Some are doing experiments and posting the results.

The knowledge that was handed to us from anywhere, is for us to use and further.

I'm more than happy to furnish stoner dreams and debate them (obviously).

I'm sure there are other good ideas out there just waiting for someone to tell us, or for us to provide ourselves.

PS Exx- I have a can give you the energy equation for piping systems, it will be of tremendous benefit in figuring out the siphon and could do a tube vid to show the equation is true... Just ask

I'd like to ask for that please, with a small explanation if you could.

But for anything else, here I have to admit, not yet.
I need to do my own homework before I can ask someone else to devote time to it.

But stay tuned................

[TryToBelieve]

From A.Q. site....

"it must be let go at 1 or 2 o?clock depending on your preferred start point, not pushed!! and it should complete more than a full circle, even once this is impossible in normal physics. If the machine can do that, it will run on its own. If not, it will never run even with a big spin."


Finally something he says that I agree with... as long as he remembers that of the 3 rods starting on the right, that the SAME rod that started at 1 or 2 returns to/past 1 or 2, an not just the rod below or two below the one that started at 1 or 2...

[BATMAN]

BATMAN ...HI ALL

Here is Mr. Quinns GRAVITY WHEEL DONE NO.2 !

3 DAYS AND COUNTING !

BATMAN HAS MADE A FEW WHEELS AND WHEN HE DRAWS THEM IN A CAD. PROGRAM THE BUILD HAS BEEN MADE.

first comes the build then the CAD. DRAWINGS.

MORE TO COME.........IT'S ALL FUN.........BATMAN.......SEES BATGIRL LETS TAKE A BRAKE A... F....HER.........

STAY TUNE..............BATMAN.

[dirt diggler]

I made some simple test of the double magnet technique. The _ indicates solid metal bar. Small neo are placed on the end of the bars. The bars are just sliding on a flat surface.

Test 1:
         10MM
____S    S__________N

  When the first bar was moved within 10MM of second bar, the second bar slid 10MM away.

Test 2:
         11MM
____N    S__________N

  When the first bar was moved within 11MM of second bar, the second bar slid in contact of the first bar.

Test 3:
         10MM                   30MM
____S   S___________N          S_____

   When the first bar was moved within 10MM of second bar, the second bar slid 30MM to contact the third bar.

30MM move instead of 11MM move and still facing the same wall.

Excellent Archer!

Larry

Larry:

Thanks for doing this test Larry.  It proves the point that Archer first started with.  magnets are not as strong in repel as they are in attract.  the added fact that the two forces together creates more than their independant tests should allow, gives us some very interesting data.
so much for equal and opposite forces, eh?

It would appear that attract is 10% stronger than repel, and used together they are 30% stronger than you would expect.
Can anyone else back this up?  I'm at work right now so I can't, but will try tonite, and post results.

ciao,  Dirt

[ramset]

LARRY!! see your taking a break from the other war[Crankypants]  welcome  just got in from the city gotta catch up  Chet