Roll on the 20th June

[fletcher]

sheesh .. it's like a constant re-run of Gordon Ramsey's 'The F Word' around here.

[Xaverius]

@All
I t might be waisted time, but i try to appeal for peace.
Here we overcame the Wall of Babylon.

Please start thinking once more about the great advantage of the new age.

It is urgend, we need help to deadict us from centralised energy supplyers, all over the world,  at the same time.
If there is a chance of woldwide freedom to mankind, the core of a movement of this kind,  can be born here.
We do not need a new world order, because we create the peacefull relationship right here, right now.
Lets have respect to eachother.
We need Free Energy as soon as possible.
Whatch the TV . See people without health care, without food and without future, as a result of war and crime.

Lets make use of our education to overcame the wall of arrogance.

As i see this  Forum is a Platform to introduce Ideas, News,  share some knowlege and learn from eachother.
As far as i know, it is free to everyone to place his own thread.
Make use of it and post your Ideas to your own thread.
Dont bring your terror of distruction in here.

Leave archer alone do not disturb him or others ,that work on their ideas.
We need free thinking Inventors.

with respect to all

helmut

Well spoken Helmut,  power to the Anti-Sheeple!!!

[yoyo]

@ ALL PLEASE READ ENTIRE POST VERY IMPORTANT

hey pure pwer - read this

why dont u shut the fuck up for like 5 seconds

all u do is blah blah blah blah

l laff at u

u think u r so smart at 20

when u hit 40 - u will look back at when u where 20 and realize how stupid u were
(like lots of us look at u now)

[chrisC]

hey pure pwer - read this

why dont u shut the fuck up for like 5 seconds

all u do is blah blah blah blah

l laff at u

u think u r so smart at 20

when u hit 40 - u will look back at when u where 20 and realize how stupid u were
(like lots of us look at u now)

I absolutely agree. You're acting really STUPID, PP.

cheers
chrisC

[INGUES]

@ ALL PLEASE READ ENTIRE POST VERY IMPORTANT

Okay, I said previously I would stop talking "people" and only "ideas," but something came my attention that is of dire importance.

Archer left me this little post on my tube vid, "Egyptian Fulcrum Uncovered:"

Archer, if you want to bring out the big guns, then lets play.

On December 10, 1948 the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted and proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. In it, it states:


You are already in violation of Article 1. Any publication of my privet information would be a violation of Article 3 as it is a direct infringement upon my "security of person." My right to security is protected by INTERNATIONAL LAW.

If you chose to publish any information as mentioned, I will come down on you with the full force of the law. I have two VERY successful attorneys in my immediate family that would happily take the case. I will own every single one of your possessions (Ive always wanted in a place in Australia). I would first return all donations you received. I would salvage the lever and pay back your misses for all the money you took from her. You will have nothing.

DONT FUCK WITH ME.

Now I understand I have said a few things as well that may be considered a violation of Article 1. However, I have documentation of all said correspondences, including a copy of your "Newtonian View" page, and I have absolutely no doubt in my mind the courts would see right through you and your banter and slander.

---------------------------------------

Now moving away from the legal side, I hope this wakes people up to the true character of the man you are all throwing your money at.

I have two different scenarios Id like everyone to consider for a moment:

Scenario 1
You are a true humanitarian out to save the world. You understand one of the major saving graces for humanity would be to provide clean, free energy. You spend time and money researching and developing a device to meet these need and eventually find it. You have saved the world. Now that you have done so, you sit on the device for a year and a half, then make the device public and promise everyone directions and a demonstration. A few months prior to the release as promised, you destroy the device to save oilman jobs. You then spend time and money on something completely irrelevant to your original promise. A week before said deadline, you attempt to rebuild what you once had, but fail due to lack of financial resources. You then tell the world it can be if you receive monetary support.

Scenario 2
You are down and out because you cant hold a job. As a failed actor, you understand people will pay nearly any price for entertainment. You also understand that people love a good story and a hero. You think to your self: right now in these times of global energy crisis, what better hero than an inventor of free energy that all will have? Knowing the public is wise and there have been FE scams in the past, you must be more creative than asking for money from the start. Instead, you start putting on a big show, cursing and ranting about the injustice in the world. You build hope in all who see. You get everyone cheering for their hero: you, the underdog, a man of the people, savior of the world. Now that you have gained international stardom, how do you collect? You must fail, but not in a way that will discourage your followers: you must miss a deadline. Make that deadline known from the start, it will get everyone talking. But if you tell everyone you already have a device, how can you miss the deadline? You must claim to destroy it for the good of the world, then attempt to rebuild after you realize your mistakes. Once you have publicly failed trying to "save the world," of course all of your followers are going to send you their money in support. If not for desire for FE, they would send it for sheer entertainment to see the story continue.

Disclaimer: these scenarios are entirely fictitious and not intended to depict any individual or event (Got to cover my assets in case things do go to court!)

Now between these two scenarios, which one seems more likely? Truly ask yourself, would you ever destroy a device that could save the world? And if you did, would you wait until a week before to rebuild? Would the humanitarian logically set a deadline for himself (coincidentally on his birthday), or just release it as soon as possible?

Now let me throw another variable into both scenarios:

All during the process and interaction with the public, you have individuals saying the device would be non-functional as defined.

Now, who do you think is more likely to rant and curse at these "naysayers?"

Do you think it would be the humanitarian in Scenario 1, who is just out to save the world for the good of man? Would the man in Scenario 1 threaten to destroy the privacy and career of a 20 year old college student simply because he choses to present an opposing view?

Or do you think it is the con man in Scenario 2, who is having his entire plan threatened by a couple of individuals who just wouldnt take the bait? Would this man threaten to destroy the privacy and career of a 20 year old college student simply because he choses to present an opposing view?

Again, ask yourself which scenario seems more likely...

(Disclaimer: these scenarios are entirely fictitious and not intended to depict any individual or event)


-PurePower


(Disclaimer: the previously mentioned scenarios are entirely fictitious and not intended to depict any individual or event)... just for good measure

EDIT: I forgot to say... Im not really worried about my credibility. I already have a promising future at one of the best international engineering firms, and none of them have heard of AQ or give a shit about his meager existence and claims. In fact, probably less than 10,000 people have even heard of him out of the 6 billion on this rock. I just dont want personal info out there...

What knowledge he is trying to object is "And the only reason the extension is "way past" is cuz it doesnt way much, and allows me to control the torque by sliding it in and out. But Im sure you understand this, oh great master of the lever!" (in reference to my control weight on my debunk lever). I think every engineer and layperson with a decent thought process would agree with me. Less weight out far is the same as more weight close in. Sound right to everyone else?

Hey Purepower,

Shut the fuck up! 

I am sick and tired of skipping through hundreds of your bullshit posts to get to what is relevant.  If you think archer is an idiot then leave.  If you have a problem with Archer exposing your identity then STOP TALKING TO HIM!  If you think we're all stupid for believing in what Archer has to say then STOP TALKING TO US!  If you don't think his wheel will amount to anything then STOP POSTING IN THIS FORUMN!  You are making it very obvious that you are a 20 year old snobby little shit (more like 20 going on 16) with these childish little threats and rants. 

Oh and don't you dare reply to my post with your bullshit "I agree with this but" and "I disagree with your point because" bullshit.  Don't quote me, don't reply to me, don't PM me, just SHUT THE FUCK UP!

INGUES