Roll on the 20th June

[exxcomm0n]

@ ramset (Chet)

EXX
I beg off on Battling witty exchanges with you,I am Woefully out classed!
I would however like to retain "W" [Wilfred Bennard Ibeatuponomous  AKA WilbyInebreated] as my Barrister in this Matter!

It seems you have legal representation that has a little difficulty expressing himself and his aim. This is not a good quality in those retained for the purpose of representing anyone about the parameters of intentions and the social or legal limits thereof, as an advocate is supposed to sway opinion in the favor of their client, or else  logically the client could represent themselves with the same chance of positive results and much less expense.

But, if you're to take his opening statement and disect it to lessen the obfuscation and oxymoronic nature of it, you're going to find some puzzles like those below that attribute those natures to it.

You barrister seems to have a difficulty distinguishing the nature of oft used (and misused) terms and phrases e.g.

1.)

it's not that i "dislike"...

Did I accuse him of disliking anything? I believe my only statement that could be construed as addressing him recently was:

.....then you and Wilby can proselytize and cheerlead for Crooker to your hearts content

www.phrases.org.uk kindly offers the definition of:
"To one's (or your) heart's content means to one's complete inner satisfaction - until one's heart is content. "

That seems a far cry from dislike.

2.)

i could care less what one fool donates to another fool.

He cares about the actions of those that he deems fools?

Now while I'll admit that there are fools whose actions we should all care about, namely politicians as they are the only fools that have the power to effect our lives, I usually completely lose any interest of any type in those I deem a fool except when the actions of that fool may endanger my safety or freedom <see above>.

If he "could care less" there is some amount of care he must have to be able to attain a lesser amount care.
Perhaps he meant he "couldN'T care less" as that would attribute an absence of caring and so the level of care would reside at null.

Actually, I think he has a misunderstanding of my level of care about his opinion since his dismissal, but hopefully he should be able to discern it now.

3.)

posting here demanding satisfaction for a donation is beyond asinine... and moves you that much closer to archer. i've read your posts, i know you are better than that.

K, considered an asinine fool, but known to be better than that?
The chasm of dichotomy in being first called an asinine fool, and then appealing to something "better than that" should be obvious to anyone.

The "concentrated nasty" of these arguments is a bit ridiculous if they contain no real logic.

Personally, I'd investigate different counsel.

If it is determined to be Fraud ,I will attempt to cover Archers Debt to you
It may take some time......
Chetkremens@gmail.com

I think Crooker's actions have determined fraud beyond a reasonable doubt, don't you?

The fraud would be that he introduced an idea as an already accomplished fact.

The proof would be that 3 years after the promised release of this unsubstantiated fact we ain't seen hide, nor hair of any proof to sustain that he's "been there, done that".

You covering his debt is not necessary as it was a statement made more to prove a point than one to be used as an actual avenue of renumeration.

Let's see if Crooker (the inept Inuit) Quinn can step up with the proof the last 3 years have lacked to substantiate that claim.

Until then, I assert that his intent was fraudulent and that a donation given to what proves a fraudulent "cause" is no more protected from the pursuit of recompense than any other unsatisfying fiscal transaction.

Get the picture?

[ramset]

Exx
See I don't see it as Fraud at all,But missguided Zeal,biting off more than one can ever hope to Chew in the heat of the moment.

And then having done so, Choking..........

See I propose that Archer  was suffering from lack of oxygen at times
due to Hyperventilation and Choking.
This Made him Woozy and unable to make rational decisions at times,
And since he did not have the benifit of a Sidekick [assistant]
and was performing superhuman Feets Solo.

He Choked..............

A sincere dedicated Humanitarian with a Devout hatred of apples and Newton ,A real Mans Man A "hero" if you would??

Who, left to choke on his overchew [bite] became delerious and not totaly accountable for his actions.

A tru Hero Never the less..........
This is the argument I will be Developing .......
And the money Back thing It is for real,I feel i am Culpable in your loss!

And since you are a "good sort" will share your loss [financial]

To be continued...........

Chet

[WilbyInebriated]

i do not represent ramset... did you see me accept his proposal?
now, let's get on to your logical fallacies, misrepresentations and outright lies...

1.)
Did I accuse him of disliking anything? I believe my only statement that could be construed as addressing him recently was:

www.phrases.org.uk kindly offers the definition of:
"To one's (or your) heart's content means to one's complete inner satisfaction - until one's heart is content. "

That seems a far cry from dislike.

nice attempt at misdirection... and an outright lie. yeah, you did accuse me of disliking:

You not liking that I'm calling him to the carpet about it and Wilby not liking that I'm asking for a refund of a donation doesn't concern me, much as Crooker's failure to produce what he promised, even to this day, doesn't seem to concern either of you.

We all have our agendas, eh?

maybe you should actually pay attention to what you post... i expect you will now attempt to argue semantics over 'disliking' and 'not liking'... TU STULTUS ES...

2.)
He cares about the actions of those that he deems fools?

Now while I'll admit that there are fools whose actions we should all care about, namely politicians as they are the only fools that have the power to effect our lives, I usually completely lose any interest of any type in those I deem a fool except when the actions of that fool may endanger my safety or freedom <see above>.

If he "could care less" there is some amount of care he must have to be able to attain a lesser amount care.
Perhaps he meant he "couldN'T care less" as that would attribute an absence of caring and so the level of care would reside at null.

Actually, I think he has a misunderstanding of my level of care about his opinion since his dismissal, but hopefully he should be able to discern it now.

i could care less... again, tu stultus es.

3.)
K, considered an asinine fool, but known to be better than that?
The chasm of dichotomy in being first called an asinine fool, and then appealing to something "better than that" should be obvious to anyone.

again, tu stultus es... i never said you were an asinine fool... i said "posting here demanding satisfaction for a donation is beyond asinine". there is a not so subtle difference i wouldn't expect you to understand. although i would expect you to engage in logical fallacy... and you did.

next logical fallacy...

edit: i was mistaken though... you obviously aren't 'better than that'.
if you have a problem with your donation to archer, sue him in a court of law for recourse... whinging about it here make you look asinine.

[exxcomm0n]

This is a work in progress and much more derision and reaping of my amusement in Wilby to follow. I just have to change locations right now and editing the post later there serves my purposes bettah.

Stay tuned......

i do not represent ramset... did you see me accept his proposal?

Doesn't really matter whether you did or not. I'll use it as an excuse for my amusement much as your posts here try to achieve the same.
Should I hold myself to less of a standard  than you do?

Let's proceed.

now, let's get on to your logical fallacies, misrepresentations and outright lies...nice attempt at misdirection... and an outright lie. yeah, you did accuse me of disliking:maybe you should actually pay attention to what you post... i expect you will now attempt to argue semantics over 'disliking' and 'not liking'... TU STULTUS ES...

Oh gee, I'm sorry I don't hang on your every word. I picked the convenient ones, like you do. Just trying to keep up with the standards you set.
I wonder, what's your definition of "recently" please?

But K then, I"m stupid and you enjoy interaction with stupid people soooo much that you care to spend so much time interacting with them and seem to wait in anticipation of the chance.
I feel warm and fuzzy now.

But it does seem the activity of a troll, and as much as you may deny other things, you're strangely silent on that observation.

But it's K 'cause now I have 2 dancing monkeys for my amusement.

Latin cannot lend your attacks upon me credence or substance. I do pay attention to things I deem worthy of attention. Your cares are not, you supercilious sot.

But you are a more fun toy now, proving as good as Archer in soooo many ways, so carry on.
All it takes is a little taunting, eh?

But, if you want to parade as a higher intelligence, try to do it w/ a little more style as that is inherent of someone that uses those words regularly, instead of looking them up and using them in an attempt to spice up their weak commentary because the charade will wear thin and won't help hide that certain dribble of the slack-jawed you've portrayed so well.

i could care less... again, tu stultus es.

So much to say and so few ways to say it. This is the part that will wearing thin anon. But for now yer funny so ride it into the sunset, Sundance.

again, tu stultus es... i never said you were an asinine fool... i said "posting here demanding satisfaction for a donation is beyond asinine". there is a not so subtle difference i wouldn't expect you to understand. although i would expect you to engage in logical fallacy... and you did.

next logical fallacy...

edit: i was mistaken though... you obviously aren't 'better than that'.
if you have a problem with your donation to archer, sue him in a court of law for recourse... whinging about it here make you look asinine.

Oh gee, why should I rise to a status that you don't hold yourself to?

Dance monkey, dance.

[ramset]

HHMMM
A rubber room match?

W    Ibeatumupumous [His Latin handle]

Vs The  X man.  AKA   EXXValdeez  Ileakumoutamylipumous Muchamous [his latin Handle]

HHMMMmmmm.

Chet