Roll on the 20th June

[The Eskimo Quinn]

egyptian history speaks of rocking devices, i will hunt you the link when i get my site mail back

[The Eskimo Quinn]

anyone wishing to try it, use those swimming pool floating stciks of various names(pool noodles etc), as to the egyptian fulcrum, have tested all components for lift and movement and all working exactly to correct movement and weight transfer. Picked up a couple of hundered kilos of steel today (told you it was going to be big) and a few key machine parts. willl be listing my FJ40 landcruiser this weekend for sale no motor but its a topless shorty 1976 model, should get 600 dollars in about 3 seconds (fully restored they go for as much as 25,000) and a set of cut down doors goes for more than that, but thats all i need and can always buy a nice one later on. so instead of taking bits from each pay, i will be able to do it in 3 weeksends tops. finished !! running and on film before the date, as i said, this too is no first build i prototyped at 12 feet and 1 kg heavey weight and it worked with a 9 to one lift from the heavy weight drop, so the sending of the single weight back to start i chose a downhill run, and instead of 9 to one, went 5 to one and lifted it higher to send it back to the start.

you are gunna love this one, i only need a good tilt mechanism to kcik the fucker off, and got a machined one today that wroks like a dream, if you haer about a plane crashing into victoria in the suburbs you'll know they got me, you will ba able to see this thing from fucking space. the fulcrum is above my head, and i couldnt build it indoors, so i am screening off part of the yard from the street, so i don't look like bill cosby as Noah and the fucking ark.

Yeah sure there'll be screams about how i cheated and it isnt a real offbalance fulcrum as you understand it, but hey, perpetual motion is perpetual motion right?

but maths is maths right??

200 kgs over 1 square meter is the same downward pressure as 200kgs over half a square metre right?? i mean the downward presure is still the same as if on a wheel with small or large padlles to sit it on right?? come one guys, you have spat these figures at me for a fucking week, 200 kgs down is 200 kgs down right? what abot over 6 inches square??

try this, a box with 200 kgs in it , tie a rope to the front of it and pull, bet you cant move it, now tilt the box onto one edge and i bet you can move it, same weight??? same psi pressure??? but less surface area of friction. all the math in the world cannot beat physics in the real world.

worlds tallest buildings, sway yes?? put them in a windproof vacum, still sway?? actaully they do, why??? and newton never even wrote of this ever. planetary rotation, there are many things that are not some magic, are not some breach of physics, just simple physics we accep[t everyday, that affects things that according to newtonian math should not be affected.

like the example of the two identical pieces of tube on the up yours page acting differenty in exactly the same circumstances and environment, ever see that before, where position alone changes physics? course you have a vertical pin or a horizotal pin on the meniscus of a glass of water, one floats the other sinks.

to leran you must live, and observe the evryday physics around you, to quote the words of others is the braying of  mindless sheep.

Ever wonder about the moon landing film and all the bullshit stories about flags and winmd and all the crap. well heres a first from me not previously noticed or ever published anywhere in the world. but through the eyes of a pure logic thinker, there was one mistake (it really is a bummer to try and show the world you were first just to win even if you have to fake it)

and what's worse no newtonian ever picked up on it, and i have read em all. what about the apple you dickheads???

what does everything appear to do?? float partially when they jump etc, sure you can tie anything to lines except one thing. "THE FUCKING DIRT" everything floated up then down, but when they jumped the dirt that jumped up, fell down at earth speed, the lightest of partclices in the film just went plop straight back down again. the first and the easiest and  with shit rocket technology and we havent been back after all the shuttle trips. download a copy of that before they modify the film.

I never watched it again since i was a kid, until a space suit engineer said what they were wearing was no better than an airconditioned film costume and had no protection from the radiation, and they would all be dead.

Think about that for one moment, NASA and every science expert in the world says that without the ozone to protect us it would be like an apple in front of a blow torch, and they did not land on the dark side of the moon? work that shit out with your fucking maths. beats the shit out of me.

if they were there, then the moon is one weird fucking place man!! like crazy and far out, (well that's what they would have said in 69')

now exactly what respected people is it that you are basing your math and theory on???

Apples and blow torches, now we're cooking!!

[Thaelin]

  Well well, that sounds like a sweet idea to me. Rock on dude. The coils will add to the flywheel effect as well making more torque to the shaft.

thaelin

Hey kids,


@ all

I wanted to build and test a prototype before posting but I'm antsy about this idea.

Solenoids.

What if the electromagnet was not exerting influence from the exterior of the wheel, but instead was surrounding the tube w/ the magnet/weight inside it on the axis of the wheel?

I've read that you can generate electricity by dropping a permanent magnet inside a coil of wire (solenoid), but can you also influence movement of a magnet by applying voltage to the coiled wire?

Or, use a iron core slug in the center as a fixed location electromagnet attracting/repelling separate magnet weights in the tube towards the center and out to the perimeter? (An electromagnet has poles like any other magnet, correct?)

I still have to draw this out to see if it has any merit and if so, if the tubes could all occupy the same plane instead of being stacked one atop the other.
This would make 6 tubes, 1 magnet/weight apiece. Then you could statically mount the pulse electromagnet 7/1 and use permanents to keep the angle.

Just thoughts, no hard evidence...........yet.

Also, I saw someone post that perhaps my idea won't work due to the scale not being 1M+, and perhaps they are right. But unless they have a physical object lesson to make of it (me) and can post it/show me, I'll keep forging ahead.

[PwrDream]

Archer,

I'm sure this is probably a question you've been asked, and to you may be a very obvious and stupid question, so please forgive me for asking in advance, but is a small scale "toy" version of your device possible?  Say, a model that is only 12" in size, or does the device require a specific size/weight/mass to function?

Also,  I speak for myself (and possible others) when I say that a picture is worth a thousand words.  I would love to see a sketch, even an extremely rough sketch, of your last lesson posted here in the forum.  I am a visual thinker, and as much as I try to draw out your lesson on paper, I'm sure that I'm not creating the image you have in your head.  If you ever have a chance to sketch out and post something I'd greatly appreciate it .


Thanks,

PwrDream


P.S. - I'm considering constructing a small model of this concept to play with and I wanted to get suggestions as to the type of slide rod/bushing people are using for their replication attempts.  I assume that to get the magnet/weight from the 7 o'clock position to the 1 o'clock position smoothly and without friction on the rod that a good rod/bushing combination is necessary.  I've found a website with nice miniature slide bush (http://www.nbcorporation.com/product/inch_miniture.html), but I was wondering what everyone here might be using.  I thought of butchering a few old inkjet printers to get the rod and slide out of them for this experiment, but if anyone has any other suggestions as to what I should use, I'm all ears.

[The Eskimo Quinn]

AS far as rod go, i am pretty sure most inkjet printers are steel rods, and no good anyway. as for size, it was prety much toy sized originally, the only variance i guess is it is harder to use the perm mag setup in place ofthe electro magnet at seven due to weight restrictions over magnetic field strength..

as you can see the site is toast along with my mail, but i was nowhere near the bandwidth, i checked, only ran up 45 gig and i have a limit of 15000 gig, cant get hold of the server admin either. no matter i will simply dump the download to multiple sites as an attachment after i send yaz a copy.

having lots of trouble posting here too, as soon as everything is right to go i will get done from a net cafe, i will make sure the download has 2 parts, video and drawings.

good luck and see you soon, (well at least you will see me soon)