Play vortices...

[iacob alex]

...so to interfere with the natural flow of energy,act as a drag,dam up the "fresh" power around us.

Remind that the real, "unsophisicated" physical world of  "pantha rei" shows and suggests in so many ways the pattern of vortices.

With no vortex,there is no dissipative power in a natural passage of energy.We can notice it easy in a free water  flow;translational movement changes into,is transffered into a rotational motion.

Inside  an irrotational field(gravitational flow) ,we can play vortices if we take the advantage of the inertial frame.

It seems that a trebuchet becomes involved in a so kind of interplay...

If we introduce a vertical reference line that cross a vortex figure,we get so easy an asymmetric design:you know...the long arm-short arm on the same side of the fulcrum concept... an so "old" concept.   

The gravitational field plays as a "rigid" fluidic channel,stream bed..is irrotational... so the solution for a vortex outline moves in the rotational inertia,where we can play the flexible action-reaction game: a pulsatory on-off gate,valve in a huge space of  the basic energy.

In my opinion,the solution can be a kind of an asymmetric swinging,pulsatory,cyclic movement for a particular pendular arrangement.

Thinking so,with no vortex,we have no fresh/free energy?


   All the Bests!  /  Alex

[iacob alex]

......as the deep,root configuration of the natural energy.

      An easy representative  illustration of this unseen fountain,spring of power in a mechanical shape of vortex,you can discover in a case of an Atwood machine with a massive,very heavy pulley: a rotational momentum,whirl,eddy,avalanche.

      In fact,we play the time factor,nothing more...

      The time factor can be engaged in some mechanical designs...

               All the Bests!  /  Alex

[iacob alex]

....with this "strange" shape that can be gravity::a spinning flow can evolve,generate into a linear,one-dimensional stream?

    The main question is ,if in the natural world,a rotational process can be developed in an irrotational  one.

    Gravity can be imagined,assimilated,conceived as a release,unbind discharge of a vortex?

     If so, the problem of a gravity powered device becomes how to access,attach to a "linear" vortex development?

     The vortex basics can help us?


                 All the Bests!  /  Alex

[greendoor]

Has anyone ever done any experiments to see if a free-falling weight rotates?  We know a free-swinging pendulum rotates - 360 degrees per day.  Bessler mentioned the rotation of a falling snowflake in some of his clues ...

I tend to agree with the asymmetric, swinging, pulsatory,cyclic movement comment.  I have a thought experiment that suggests the possibility of a reactionless space drive - unidirectional force without ejecting mass.  It requires asymmetric, swinging, pulsatory,cyclic movement. 

IMO - if a reactionless space drive could work, then a gravity wheel is the exact opposite.  It should be able to convert unidirectional force back into rotating motion.

I could explain further if there was genuine interest ...

[iacob alex]

     
      Hi  Greendoor!

Your viewpoint that a reactionlees space drive and a gravity powered device have something in common is productive for me.

I was involved in one and the other,in the last time.

The both  asks for an asymmetric,swinging,pulsatory movement..as you said.

But...as a concept,a gravitry "wheel",in my opinion , is NOT the opposite of a space drive.
 
A gravity wheel can work due to gravity and to rotational inertia.

A space drive(I call it "Stellarotor") can work everywhere,due to rotational inertia only.

Their simple "profile" is the fall on an inclined plane,a vortex type evolution in a pulsatory cyclic motion.

If you have one design,the other is an elementary transfer,shift of a solid state fall on an incline,from gravity+ rotational inertia into a fall ,sink,go down on an incline into rotational/centrifugal field.

The both  play a pulsatory solid state vortex,but in fact an up and a down.

    All the Bests!  ?  Alex