Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?

[poynt99]

big sparks and burned out 20W light bulbs doesn't prove there is more energy out than in. they show only the output results of a highly-compressed input.

if you know what that means then you know you can't assume that the TOTAL output power exceeds the input power.

to put this into perspective, i could build a step charging device that charges a 10F capacitor from a 1.2V watch battery. it will take several days maybe to charge the cap to 100V, but when I discharge it into a short length of 30 gauge wire, chances are the wire will explode. in this case as is the case similar to MAC's devce, i have simply taken the small energy from a small source and condensed it into a device that will dissipate all that energy in an instant rather than over a 10 day period. this is a more extreme example than what MAC is doing, but it should illustrate well how MAC is creating the big sparks.

so how about we encourage MAC to make a few basic measurements to go along with the exciting light show? without some measurements, would anyone right now bet their life savings that it is ou? ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh, i didn't think so

[innovation_station]

@poynt99

go push the button on your bbq if u want ou....

give it 4 months aint be any saveings left.....

dont we know.....


ist

so how about that amero.....

[sparks]

big sparks and burned out 20W light bulbs doesn't prove there is more energy out than in. they show only the output results of a highly-compressed input.

if you know what that means then you know you can't assume that the TOTAL output power exceeds the input power.

to put this into perspective, i could build a step charging device that charges a 10F capacitor from a 1.2V watch battery. it will take several days maybe to charge the cap to 100V, but when I discharge it into a short length of 30 gauge wire, chances are the wire will explode. in this case as is the case similar to MAC's devce, i have simply taken the small energy from a small source and condensed it into a device that will dissipate all that energy in an instant rather than over a 10 day period. this is a more extreme example than what MAC is doing, but it should illustrate well how MAC is creating the big sparks.

so how about we encourage MAC to make a few basic measurements to go along with the exciting light show? without some measurements, would anyone right now bet their life savings that it is ou? ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh, i didn't think so

      What you said is very true. But the opposite can be accomplished also.  Say we have an event like the charge seperation resulting from the grid resistive effect  coming out of the wall that gets expressed every 1/60th of a second.  Now we take this force to time relationship and chop it up so that the change in charge  (this is what will be doing the work) happens every millionth or billionth of a second.  (remember it doesnt cost energy to turn something off)  We will now have the charge seperation that does the work doing it's thing every billionth of a second instead of every 1/60th.  A system that does work as a result of changing the charge state or dielectric distribution of a field will see a marvelous overunity effect.

[innovation_station]

     00o my

now it gets wild!!

hummm

not sure it is worth my time to talk to you guys bout this.....

lets apply devici and the golden spiral...  to this .... 

well   also  somthing else bout the stones just clicked ...but

is this worth the effort?


anyone on the same page?.....

this looks to me to be a delicate musical instrement  if we apply devinci to this we get a creative outward  spiral vortex   meaning the coil could be  and should be activated from the inside out in quadture most likely frieing the spiral sequance but really who knows

it is fact that  2 engeryies are at play creative and destructive   creative is inside out as in nature and     destructive ...  our current world..,..

birth stones are related how?   by 3's 4's how ...   i think 3 6 9 and there 4 groups of 3 stones.... they are intangled ..... through harmonics...

ist

drawing a posible fireing seq   for this coil inside out   

[CodeWebs]

This kind of goes along with what ist is saying; it reminds me of an idea I had some time ago.  I always wondered what kind of results would be achieved if the triple stack tpu wasn't stacked one on top of the other, but if it was actually stacked from the inside out in 3 layers, configured in the exact same manner in all other aspects.  It seems either in wording could be confused with the other, but they both may show different results.  (On top of one another could be taken as vertically on top of one another or layered on one another as concentric coils surrounded by concentric toroids).  I'm not sure if this has ever been considered, maybe it has.