Cancer cure, but FDA and doctors would rather have your cash and not the cure.

[wizardofmars]

Hehe, your narrow mindedness is amusing and funny, but I still love you for it because you are part of all there is...

So post some proof of your claims if you are so 'open minded'.

[amigo]

Many here have posted a lot of material but in your "expert" opinion it was not sufficient "proof", so why should I dwell there again?

Did you even look into all the stuff people have talked about here, and I mean honestly looked into, using a scientific method before reaching a conclusion it's all bunk?

It appears to me no matter how much "proof" we provide it would never be enough. You seem to have made up your mind before hand...

[professor]

So post some proof of your claims if you are so 'open minded'.

Same old rhetoric.same old jerk.
professor

[WorldOrder]

There is no 100 percent cure for cancer to this date.  Are there people that really believe that we have a cure but evil men and giant corporations are keeping it from the masses?

People need to remember that even as advanced as we have become in the field medicine, we still lack the cure for the common cold. 
There are great new treatments for people who have cancer but there are also great new treatments for the common cold too.  Still no cure for either.


W.O.

[alexpio]

I've collected all kind of infos about cancer since the early seventies, and every single time someone came up with a new theory or approach to cure cancer, he/she has been ridiculed by the media and medical establishment. Sometimes I've seen scientists or researchers close to be proposed for a Nobel prize nomination, bite the dust in the matter of few weeks after they take an unpopular position, and they all end up on the infamous "quackwatch" website.
I have a video of an oncologists symposium where an Australian doctor gets a 20 minutes standing ovation from his colleagues after his speech, but, as of today, I still find him on "quackwatch" :


http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/chachoua.html


Now, in light of what happened 9 years ago (see link below), my question is:

is this doctor still supposed to be referred as a "quack"?

http://www.explorepub.com/articles/sam_chachoua.html