Hubbard coil

[ramset]

Well,
When I spoke to William Barbat last month,That was the biggest question ,and perhaps the only reason I called.

Was there any isotope, radiation etc........ Required?

ABSOLUTELY NOT !!
End of story ........................

Chet

[sigma16]

We are all missing something. Sigma16 claim he knows all about these free energy devices yet has never built anything, demonstrated anything or disclosed anything.

Who knows what is true or what Hubbard really said (if anything) or if he was telling the truth. Ya just learn what you can, and take a stab at it on a bench.

For me, since I don't know enough about the subject to invent something original, I look for patterns. There are only so many ways to do something and I am sure many of these guys were doing the same thing different ways.

For example the mutual inductance of the Cook patent and the coils of the Hubbard coil are the same and that is mighty interesting to me. Cook predated radium but had cu oxide wire. Barbet probably knows what he is talking about.

I never claimed to know about all OU devices, but I have learned to spot the ones that are probably BS.  I have demonstrated very important things, which everyone dismissed because they thought they knew better.  So be it.

For Barbat's thing you need the salmon-colored cuprous oxide not the black one (copper oxide) that is on wire that has been exposed to air. 

http://www.hpfriedrichs.com/rr-cu-diode.htm

[ramset]

SOoooo.,
Grumpy

How come you can't try to login as Grumpy?
If the Buzz got his wings back?This new name stuff stinks!
Maybe Stefan did the Chinese clean slate new year thingy?


Try it..............

Chet

[the_big_m_in_ok]

Re: Alexander patent US3913004

Here you go with links:

http://www.pat2pdf.org/patents/pat3913004.pdf

http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=lYA3AAAAEBAJ&dq=patent:3913004&as_drrb_ap=q&as_minm_ap=0&as_miny_ap=&as_maxm_ap=0&as_maxy_ap=&as_drrb_is=q&as_minm_is=0&as_miny_is=&as_maxm_is=0&as_maxy_is=&num=10




This one is a referenced sub-patent; about as easy to understand:
http://www.google.com/patents?id=Wog9AAAAEBAJ&printsec=abstract&zoom=4#v=onepage&q&f=false

--Lee

[the_big_m_in_ok]

Hey Lee,

It looks to me like Hubbard was using a 8 pole motor then? Lots of torque would be perfect for an old boat. If Hubbard didn't patent it, there may be a patent that predated 1920 which would make it pretty fair game for commercial sales.

I haven't looked at the motor much, but the coil was probably wired in series and the power takeoff was from the center coil:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/14070044/Free-Energy-Hubbard-Coil
(pg. 38 of this mss)

Some of the pictures in the book are better, but smaller, than what is usually found concerning Hubbard's work.  And, was it said elsewhere or not?  Kapanadze-replicated devices can fairly often have a coil arrangement that reminds me of Hubbard.

Without oil, we don't need Northup Grumman's bombs and planes and Grumpy/Sigma16 would have to find a job doing something productive that doesn't involve polluting the Earth and slaughtering the innocents. He could start by not polluting this forum with his disinformation.

Yeah, I see.  My idea is that they have the guns and law on their side.  Karen Silkwood was a whistleblower.

--Lee