Linnard?s hydrogen on demand system without electricity !

[loosecannon]

looks great RR!

good luck.

are you concerned at all about the horizontal tungsten rods shifting or settling and thus upsetting the connection between them?

i hope i have not misunderstood something here.
it looks to me like the horizontal rods are connecting all the rods together.

am i wrong?
sorry, not a scientist here.LOL
LC

[ResinRat2]

loosecannon wrote:
are you concerned at all about the horizontal tungsten rods shifting or settling and thus upsetting the connection between them?
i hope i have not misunderstood something here.
it looks to me like the horizontal rods are connecting all the rods together.
am i wrong?
sorry, not a scientist here.LOL
LC"
No LC you are not wrong. The horizontal rods are connecting all the rods together, but I have them placed and nestled within each other in such a way that they will not shift out of position unless I turn the whole reactor at an extreme angle (like 90 degrees,LOL!) The holder is cemented to the bottom of the reactor so it will not move.

You say you are not a scientist, but you obviously are sharp enough to work out the visual details. NICE!!

Thanks for the compliment and encouragement

[loosecannon]

i sort of figured you had already considered this, but, like you, i am trying to play devil's advocate to avoid surprises. LOL

i realized the first time i came to this forum, that it was 90% over my head as far as the math, and the theoretical concepts being discussed, but i knew that of all the subjects being discussed on the internet, that this is the most important one of all.

thats when i knew that i had to buckle down and just force myself to wade through posts that i dont understand, knowing that little by little, the knowledge will seep in.LOL

i do it everyday, and i am beginning to understand things. a bit...

music is one of my many hobbies, and i learned early on that playing with musicians who are better than you makes you a better player.

i have been following this thread since you first posted  to it, and i will be here until there is nothing left to learn.
so, forever i guess...LOL

so, dave, let me leave you with the one piece of formal scientific advice i know, which was given to me by my high school physics teacher.
he said, "check your math". LOL

again, good luck,
we all appreciate the time and expense you have invested in this,
LC

[loosecannon]

RR,

was looking back through the thread in an attempt to refresh my memory a bit.

a question arose.

are you still going to be manually switching the connection to the zinc electrodes every 12 hours with this reactor?

if so, are you interested in having a circuit do it for you?

it shouldnt be too hard for me to find a circuit that will do that, and breadboard it up.
i would be willing to build it and send it to you.
its the least i can do after all the money you have spent only for us to benefit from it.LOL

i realize the ramifications of doing the switching this way, as in, how will we power the circuit?
will it be powered by the output of the reactor?

i believe that to be a secondary consideration, because once the reactor is working properly, it should be no problem to provide a few volts every 12 hours.

i think it would be ok to power this circuit from a 9 volt battery for now, just to ease the burden on you physically.

of course, there will be those that choose to disbelieve just because they see a battery on the table.LOL

ok, that oughta distract you just enough to make you forget something that is actually important.LOL

(can you tell i am at work right now?)
LC


PS-one more question so i can learn something here:

will a varying load change the reactions going on in the reactor, or will the reaction remain constant regardless of the load applied to the output?
just thinking because the fan was always drawing the same amount of power.
thanks.

[ResinRat2]

loosecannon wrote:

are you still going to be manually switching the connection to the zinc electrodes every 12 hours with this reactor?
if so, are you interested in having a circuit do it for you?
I will still be doing manual switching initially until I can determine how much output I get from this reactor. Another person offered to design a circuit for me once I get some output numbers.  Also, I am not sure how often it will be switching. The larger number of electrodes will use up zinc faster, so it may need to be switched at shorter time intervals than 12 hours. Maybe every couple of hours or so.

it shouldnt be too hard for me to find a circuit that will do that, and breadboard it up.
i would be willing to build it and send it to you. its the least i can do after all the money you have spent only for us to benefit from it.Thanks for the offer though, I appreciate it.
i realize the ramifications of doing the switching this way, as in, how will we power the circuit?
will it be powered by the output of the reactor?Yes, all power will be from the output of the fuel cells.

i think it would be ok to power this circuit from a 9 volt battery for now, just to ease the burden on you physically. No, I don't want batteries anywhere near the unit. It must be self powered to prove overunity.

will a varying load change the reactions going on in the reactor, or will the reaction remain constant regardless of the load applied to the output? The reaction rate will go at its own pace, no matter what I hook up to the fuel cells. They operate independent of each other.
just thinking because the fan was always drawing the same amount of power.The more load I put on it, the more power the fuel cells will put out. They have a load-following capability.

Thanks for your comments and interest.