New Newman Motor Replication

[khabe]

Mh-mhh,
But why not to build at first The Motor like motor need to be built - well built, low losses, nicely made ...
After that you can add what ever - is it "Spark Device" or any else system for recharging batteries - is it "nuclear", "zero point", "vacuum" ...or comes from cosmos -  does not matter.
When motor runs without load, when what ever device charging batteries - then it runs very very long time,
As higher motor efficient - as longer it runs.
And Stefan,
I believe you have some replicated Newman Motor,
Please make video and show - what this motor is able to do - but it to work and show us,
No way? Or able for not much to work ...
Very sad, sorry,
khabe

[hartiberlin]

Maybe better way to get additional (back_emf) energy from coil and put it back to battery:

http://www.munkuvat.org/kuvat/108328.jpeg
http://www.aijaa.com/img/b/00380/2285504.gif

Where should the additional energy come from,
if you use transistor or MOSFET circuits ?

You just recycle stored energy in the coil with all
its ohmical losses.

The additional energy comes from converting the
galvanic energy at the commutator into the circuit
when the sparking occurs.

This was long the secret of Newman and I guess
he does not understand it himself,
otherwise he would not have talked about gyroscopic
particles, etc...

The Newman motor with electronic switching behaves
only as a lossy DC magnet motor !
It only gets special when we have the sparking
at the right commutator materials and only then
we get effects like these huge backspikes.

Only in the short sparking interval it behaves strange,
otherwise it just works as a normal lossy DC permanent magnet motor,
so all designs with just electronic commutation have failed so far.

It is the same with the Lutec device.

Only the arcing in the Lutec commutator gives it
its additional energy...

Hope this helps.

Regards, Stefan.

[hartiberlin]

Mh-mhh,
But why not to build at first The Motor like motor need to be built - well built, low losses, nicely made ...
After that you can add what ever - is it "Spark Device" or any else system for recharging batteries - is it "nuclear", "zero point", "vacuum" ...or comes from cosmos -  does not matter.
When motor runs without load, when what ever device charging batteries - then it runs very very long time,
As higher motor efficient - as longer it runs.
And Stefan,
I believe you have some replicated Newman Motor,
Please make video and show - what this motor is able to do - but it to work and show us,
No way? Or able for not much to work ...
Very sad, sorry,
khabe

After my vacation I will build it all up again and make new videos.
I also want then to modify an electroscooter to
get more mileage on the same charge this way.

Imagine charging up a small electroscooter, that you normally
get only 20 miles per charge and then you will get 150 miles
per the same energy charge !
Surely it will use up some graphite, but I have a cheap way
to produce my own graphite from coal brikets,
as I posted last year in the battery threads....

[Grumpy]

No Bullshit to it onlov, The BEMF is there. problem is people are too damn stupid to know how to collect it and use it.

Well put, Moab!

Looks a little more than EMF in those scope shots - 

By the way, in Eric Dollard's book on Tesla Transformers, he advises that Tesla's favorite method of producing the "effect" was capacitor discharge, and that Steinmetz indicated in his book on Transients that the discharge of a large inductor will also work and that is what you have here.  You get a 1000 feet or so of #12 and a car battery - with the correct switch you got something to write home about - 

[onlov]

hartiberlin:

Where should the additional energy come from,
if you use transistor or MOSFET circuits ?

Yes, but I don't believe at all, that burning graphite you can make extra energy.
I ask you the measuring circuit before. It's intresting, when you are measure with grounded scope, overunity features disappears.

It's necessary to measure over plasma spark cap too (Your "plasma battery") with scope and maybe is better to use balanced input with attenuator to get right result.