911 Revisited: Were explosives used? yes or no?

[b0rg13]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWgSaBT9hNU

yes or no?.

please stick to topic, the reason im asking this is because of the MASSIVE clouds of dust, ive NEVER seen it from a normal building * fire*..have you?.

[professor]

Speculations were thatThermite was used,which would explain the recorded high temperatures that could not be achieved by the Aircraft fuel billowing black smoke , an indication that it was lacking oxygen.Thermite is a pyrotechnic composition of aluminium powder and a metal oxide which produces an aluminothermic reaction known as a thermite reaction. ...it is not controlled under the Explosives Act, the Railroad still uses it to fuse their rails together.
Professor

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWgSaBT9hNU

yes or no?.

please stick to topic, the reason im asking this is because of the MASSIVE clouds of dust, ive NEVER seen it from a normal building * fire*..have you?.

[khabe]

Were explosives used? yes or no?

No.

[Yucca]

YES

Squib ejections can clearly be seen in video. How else could such a large building fall into its own footprint. If a plane crashes into a building then you will inevitably get an asymetric damage pattern which in the case of the twin towers would not even lead to a collapse, it was designed to withstand such an impact, if it did collapse then it would be an asymetric collapse, i.e. it would topple over like a felled tree. Make no mistake, this was a very professional demolition job involving thermite on the support columns followed by high explosives, possibly even micro nukes judging by the peculiar burnt metal bodies of cars nearby whilst wooden billboards weren't even charred, looks like massive electrical inductive damage due to nuke to me.

So many holes in the official story that ony a dunce would entertain it. On the BBC they even reported that tower 7 had fallen before it actually had, they got a little ahead of themselves and read the script to eagerly the fools.

[z.monkey]

Howdy b0rg13,

Obviously, one of the planes hit the corner of the one of the towers.  IF the jet fuel was sufficient to generate enough heat to penetrate the concrete casing, and then melt the massive steel rebar in the structural support only that corner would have collapsed and the impact would have blown out that corner.  There were still another 5 main supports that would have held the rest of the tower up.  Even IF the top of the tower collapsed there is still no reason the rest of it would have fallen all the way to the ground.  There is absolutely NO possibility that all four corners and the center supports would ALL have melted precisely at the same moment in time so as to make the tower collapse straight down.  THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO POSSIBILITY!  This was demolition pure and simple...

From a physics standpoint this is glaringly obvious.  Sure a 757 weights 100 tons, the World Trade Center tower weighed MILLIONS OF TONS!.  The effect would be like firing a cannon ball at my brick house.  Sure it is going to cause some damage, but it is not going to level the house to the ground.

It also seems obvious that the charges were set to fire as the upper level collapsed onto the next layer down.  The collapse of the uppermost level, ignites the level underneath it.  This cascades down the tower until it reached the lowest basement.  If you notice from the after math most of the debris is in the basement, how convenient.  Almost no collateral damage, except for WTC7 which was purposely "pulled" later that day.  Another convenient unexplained anomaly...

Jet fuel could be used to cut steel if it was mixed with pure oxygen and used as a torch.  Burning in the atmosphere it cannot attain the temperature needed to cut steel.  The large clouds of gray smoke were the concrete structures being blown to dust by demolition explosives.  I have seen it many times in controlled demolitions...

Blessed Be...