Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Gravity Mill - any comments to this idea?

Started by ooandioo, November 03, 2005, 06:13:20 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 14 Guests are viewing this topic.

ooandioo

Allright, the idea is very good - if we are able to seal the shuttle sides so that no air is able to escape.

prajna

We can do that, as per my previous design, once all the figures have been calculated but it is simpler to consider it as a simple piston for now.

hartiberlin

Hi Pranja, good work with your calculator.
Well, one thing:

So we can pump 77754.42 litres on each stroke
using Ïâ,¬ r2 * (height of the pumping tube - height of the shuttle)

So now your are subtracting the height of the shuttle ?

Is that with the displacement area full of air or without it ?

Maybe you make better the main tube x meter longer when you
ask for the deepth, so the tube will be automatically 20 cm longer than
10 Meter, if one chooses 10 Meter deepth...

Then it will not be too confusing...

2. Also it would be better, if you draw your picture this way, that
you attach some open buttom case for the air displacement area,
otherwise one can not easily see, that air is expanded from the shuttle
down below the shuttle into the displacement area.

Many thanks for your hard work.
Stefan Hartmann, Moderator of the overunity.com forum

prajna

Stefan. I have changed it again.  Now it calculates the pumped volume by subtracting the volume of the total air required to lift the shuttle and the head from the volume of the pumping tube.  To save questions, this is the volume that the air will occupy at the bottom of the pumping cycle including the displacement of the shuttle.

The height of that air in the pumping cylinder will become important when we need to figure out how close to the bottom of the pumping tube the shuttle can go so I will also include the height figure in the results.  It also tells us the height of the shuttle including a skirt to contain the expanded air (which you suggested I show on the drawing).

tbird

Quote from: prajna on August 28, 2006, 10:29:10 AM
Quotehad a short look again at your program.  with 15cm (+or-6inches) diameter and 30cm (+or-12inches) high (sounds like less than 1 cubic foot (64.7lbs)) the result is 53.01 kg.  doesn't that sound heavy to you?  maybe you need to use internal radius instead of internal diameter.

It is heavy, tbird.  That is because you have a much taller shuttle than you need.  What kind of head are you lifting?  If it were 1kg (2.2 pounds, I think) then you would need a much smaller shuttle.  Tell me the head sizes as well as the pump sizes and I will tell you a reasonable shuttle height.

How much does one cubic foot of water weigh?

unless i really don't know my metric values, 15cm diameter by 30cm high is only about (not even, 6x6square has more area than a 6"diameter circle) 25% as big as 1 cubic foot.  so 25% of 64.7 pounds (16.175 pounds or 7.35kg) doesn't sound like 53.01 kg (116.6 pounds).  what am i missing?

Quoteso there is a small passage outside the shuttle (still inside the tube) to valve 3?

your shuttle does get pretty close to elsa design.  if i see your shuttle right, the bottom of the tube will be open? to allow the shuttle to descend without moving water up threw exit pipe?

didn't see an answer to this part of my post.  should i quack?

It's better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and prove it!