Joule Thief

[electricme]

Sorry all wrong photo.
Try this one.

[Pirate88179]

@ Jim:

Nice video man!  I just now watched it.  I thought it was just a few pages back...more like 10, ha ha.  For some reason, that reminded me of a mouse chasing its tail. (Just kidding)

Bill

[electricme]

@Bill,
Thank you kind sir, I had a lot of fun building it up, I have a few other electronic kitts to build but they have to wait for another day.

I have to get my latest circuit done first.

I think I will take an early mark tonight, I'm yawning like it's going out of fashion.

Hooroo Bill

jim

[Koen1]

@Mark/MK:

Whatever dude.
You may be very good at winding coils, but you are also very good at reading things that I don't write,
and then blaming me for it.
Yes I have my questions concerning for example your high output,
but I have not said anywhere that you are wrong in your measurements, have I?
No, I have not.
I have said that I do not believe you are getting any power gain, but since you never clearly
claimed any power gain but that only appeared to be so because of the unclear formulation,
that was not calling you wrong either, was it?
So actually, I never said you were wrong about anything.
What I have said many times, and I will say it again, is that I have my questions, I am a little
confused about the various posts by various people that seem to claim power gain,
and that I do not see that happening at all in any of my experiments nor in the theoretical model,
and that what I do see happening does appear to accord with the model.
And I have asked for clarification from anyone who feels like it.

How you manage to twist that into me accusing you of being wrong, I don't know.

But please stop your insinuations and attempts to insult me, they only serve to make you look bad.

If you wish to show off some of your great discoveries, perhaps you could simply describe them?

Regards,
Koen

[WilbyInebriated]

@pirate, yes i meant the evaporation bird, glad you like the idea. as far as the issue with the electrical contact, i have great faith that a clever man like yourself shall have no problems overcoming any such issues.


@koen, mk has tried several times, quite civilly i might add, to assist you and anyone else. perhaps you should learn his native language so as to remove the language barrier that YOU seem to have trouble overcoming. once again to reiterate, the onus is not on mk, the onus is on you. you are the one who wants to replicate it, not mk.
let me put it another way, how many possible ways are there to wind the simplest mk version? have you exhausted all those possibilities with builds? i suspect the answer here is no... you are the one with questions, perhaps you should first do due diligence in answering them for yourself? or you could take some pictures of your builds, good closeups, post them and see if anyone can help you figure out where you went wrong.

your theoretical 'model' has numerous issues, first and foremost it is based upon assumptions. the existence of electrons in the wave functions of the schroedinger equation need not be assumed unless you choose. the equation does not demand this. you may assume that discrete material electrons exist, or do not exist. it's up to you. the math of quantum mechanics is neutral and takes no position. it is not possible to understand energy transfer unless you abandon the notion of a discrete particle and accept the fact: the electron is a quantum wave structure.
do you have some new equation for singularity avoidance where infinity isn't subtracted from infinity? i would love to see it
seriously, the mechanism of energy transfer using maxwell's equations has insurmountable problems. i tried to explain this to you in my last post...

no offense, but you do tend to 'parrot'. my first encounter with you here on overunity was you 'parroting' some hearsay about bedini sg's trashing batteries and it took several pages for me to get you to finally admit that you had never built one and had no plans to, if i recall.