Cavitation. The key to overunity?

[PaulLowrance]

What Paul is trying to bait me into is producing a nuclear fusion device so that the government can justify arresting me or placing me under a secrecy order. Sorry Paul, while I was born in the morning, it wasn't this morning. It is an old suppression trick they use - nice try.

Huh?  LOL, that's funny. No, I'm trying to get you to test your theory. Also, I'm trying to save the time of legitimate researchers. BTW, students and professors at Universities are working on nuclear fusion. It's not illegal, and they're not in jail. So it's a bit silly to say that by me asking you to test for gamma radiation is some attempt to get you put in jail.

Don't get me wrong, nuclear cavitation is great field, but researcher should *in the very least* learn quantum physics, or at least some basic nuclear physics. For example, I spent two years learning semiconductor physics and mathematics for my diode array research. Working on nuclear cavitation technology is far far far beyond my task of fabrication semiconductor chips.

PL

[PaulLowrance]

Here it is. Jean-Louis Naudin tested his Tom Bearden replication of the MEG for gamma radiation, and found none. Here's the quote -->

http://jnaudin.free.fr/meg/megv21.htm
Quote from Jean-Louis Naudin,
"With a gamma counter : No gamma radiation has yet been detected"

I have not verified the Jean-Louis Naudin MEG, but if it works, then IMO the "free energy" would come from ambient thermal energy.

PL

[sparks]

      Is a hole in a semiconductor or the hole in the valence shells of copper gold silver etc. considered a cavity?  The holes are massless but respond to voltage gradients.  Do the holes move before the electrons when voltage is first applied to a diode or copper conductor?    Is it possible to move the holes in the wire without moving the electrons?  Can we charge a capacitor by just moving the holes?  Can the movement of the holes exceed the speed of light?  Do the holes coalesce within a reversed biased diode to make a bigger hole? 

[PaulLowrance]

Paul, I did not cite the MEG and to my knowledge the MEG did not ever produce OU and I certainly never claimed that the MEG did a Fe56 to Fe54 transmute.

Paul, I don't know where your imaginary MEG argument came from but it has nothing to do with my theory to my knowledge but my knowledge of Beardens MEG is zero. Bearden in my mind has no credibility - he is an ex-navel intel agent. If anything he ever wrote had any value, someone would have taken the information in one of his books and put it to good use producing a free energy device. To my knowledge it has not happened. Where are they?

Next - it is my understanding that in order to run an accelerator, you need a license. I would assume universities have the necessary license and so the students are naturally not be in jail. Once again, your argument seems baseless and devoid of fact, scientific or otherwise.

While I do trust much of what Naudin says, he is but one person and fallible. Notice he didn't include the accelerator coil in his Meyer replication schematic but it is visible in the photo? What up?

Now if your idea is so good, why don't you go buy a bunch of diodes or manufacture a chip and get rich selling energy?

Last (and it would be nice if it were the last I heard of your baseless misquotes),  I could care less about conventional physics since conventional physics has more holes in it than swiss cheese just like your most recent mis-statement regarding the MEG.

To my knowledge, nobody has ever gotten Bedini's pulse motor to run OU for an extended period of time either, but I don't know what I don't know.

So why don't you build a MEG, make it run OU, buy a counter and prove me wrong. It is not my job to prove myself wrong but would gladly admit it if I were. It is just about the science with me, not some false ego driven need to be right.

I actually wish you could prove me wrong. The Methernitha is a device that was highly validated. The Gray tube is another. Please post a highly validated free energy device that was not a receiver that did not use cavitation to convert mass into the atomic energy contained within mass.

Bottom line, they will all use acceleration or cavitation to produce the same result.

This needs quoting since TheBuzz (Prometheus), via email, threatened to delete all of his posts.

I'm a huge fan of "free energy."  I just want to offer tests to either prove or disprove theories & devices that would waste a lot of legitimate research time.

For the sake of people who would get caught up into this nuclear cavitation theory, and waste a lot of good time, lets provide information so people can make a good decision -->

* TheBuzz (Prometheus) was offered to test his theory by using a Geiger counter. Prometheus's replied back that such a test is silly, even though he claims such devices are powered by nuclear cavitation.

* Prometheus discredits the MEG, even though Naudin claims to have successfully replicated the MEG.

* Naudin's Geiger counter measurements on the MEG showed no radiation.

* Prometheus's claims that I misquoted Naudin, even though I directly copied and pasted the words that are on Naudin's website --> "With a gamma counter : No gamma radiation has yet been detected"


PL

[Grumpy]

The diode array as an energy source is not so good.    Kinda like solar - the energy is free but you can't collect much of it.

Rather than argue, you can change your attitude and we will all be better for it.

How can you produce your own thermal noise by cavitation of some medium and then collect more energy?

Does the diode array have a receiving antenna or collector to help it catch more thermal noise?

What is "thermal noise" in the first place?   Does it have a longitudinal component?

================================================================

The MEG uses magnetic current - which Bearden either never mentions or doesn't know they exist.  See, Maxwell left that out of his theory and this is why "zero point" exist at all.  Add magnetic current and ZP goes away, but you gain much more.  There will be no gamma emission, but might detect something with a beta detector, especially if his core leaked, but I doubt it, it would not be a true particle anyway - just an induced charge.

================================================================

Some of your views on transmutation need to be updated.  Walter Russell transmuted flourine in a well-known and well-documented experiment - I don't recall this producing any radiation.