ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[Bob Smith]

ONE MORE THING LADIES AND GENTLEMEN

I WANT TO SHARE  A READY MADE CHIP THAT CANNOT USUALLY BUY AT THE ELECTRONIC SHOP BUT VERY AVAILABLE IN ALMOST ANY AUTO SHOP.

AND THAT IS ALTERNATORS REGULATOR. THIS THING IS GOOD, IT HAS ALSO A LAMP INDICATOR IF BATTERY IS CHARGING.

IMAGINE THERE IS MORE THAN 120V AC IN AN ALTERNATOR.

REALLY NICE CHIP

Hey Teets! Thanks for the chip tip
Here's one: http://www.premier-electric.com/files/STM/pdf/1407.pdf
Interesting data sheet says it includes a zener.
Bob

[Tito L. Oracion]

So shouldn't I also believe in this "Well, i'm just 26 years old 5' 6" in height and 75kilogram and little bit handsome" 
If your 26 now how old did you married? I think im jelous in you because you already find your girl at a very young age. 

Ya, right  , as what i have said b4 there are killers there, i will not reveal any of my identity.
but that is just for my identity ok everything else is truth.


you are computing isn't it? don't continue cause you'll end up to a wrong answer.

[a.king21]

yes, cause the work of the two battery refuses the dipole to die. but the reality will still reveal what will happen.


AND THE MILLION DOLLAR QUESTION IS HOW ARE WE GOING TO MAKE IT FOREVER!.  [size=78%] [/size]

Her's how to do it. That's why I know Tito is telling the truth unlike the ignorant who unnecessarily criticize him.
I've replicated it.
It works.
http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Patents/Benitez/GB191514311A.pdf


Look at the first paragraph on page 2 ......tum-ti-tum.....

[Magluvin]

Hey Aking

Can you show the replication?  I deleved into this sort of switching in simulator. In ideal world, the switching was able to move currents back and forth through the caps/batts with no losses. But as soon as you introduce a load in line, the voltage drop across the load screws everything up.

Even tried transformer loads with additional inductor in series on the sec, but that voltage division of any sort kills it. tried this, tried that.

So we are still back to what way to amplify energy.  Not 'amplify' like an audio amplifier where there is no free lunch. There needs to be a key device that gives more than went in, simple as that.

Tito keeps saying more coils, more output.  But how can they all add to the output from 1 input without increasing the input? Or by adding more coils(output I assume), do they not deplete the other coils of their output potential?

If not so, then it must be that each additional coil must be some distance away from the others as to not affect them.

For me, there is just not enough to go on yet. Have had to concentrate more on work. This was taking way too much of my time, so work suffered a bit.  I had to change that. I hope it all works out some day.  Cant say for sure if it will.  Weve teased about 3 years.  More like about 6. 

Ill still be around a bit.  Good luck. 

Mags

[Farmhand]

Her's how to do it. That's why I know Tito is telling the truth unlike the ignorant who unnecessarily criticize him.
I've replicated it.
It works.
http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Patents/Benitez/GB191514311A.pdf


Look at the first paragraph on page 2 ......tum-ti-tum.....

The problem is almost always in the difference of definitions of key words like power and energy, some people interchange them often some people only occasionally and some never. There are times when either power or energy can be used for example if we say the input is 1 watt for 1 hour we are talking energy but stating it with a power over time statement.

Also we can say the output is similar.

When problems arise is when people confuse the way the person intended the statement to read, no matter how it is written.

Also with translations power and energy may be mixed up.

Basically output energy is in Joules total or Joules/watts over time.

Input energy is in Joules or Joules/Watts over time.

Input and output power can be stated as 1 kw in and 2 kw out but with no mention of time it could be 1 kw for 1 hour input and 2 kw for 10 seconds output, obviously the input is less power than the output but the output is less energy than the input in that case.

Also sometimes people do make mistakes and say energy when they meant to say power.

If the Linked machine was OU then we would have seen a demonstration by now and if there is no demonstration, then someone saying it will output more energy than input should build it and show the extra energy. Whats to fear when it's already patented.

And claiming MIB BS is just ridiculous because when people claim to have OU they ought to be running the same risks as showing it, and take the same precautions. But no one is scared to say they have OU unless they actually did have it.

SO if Tito actually had OU and he believed in the MIB angle he would be too scared to even say he had OU. Logically people that claim to have OU but won't say how to get it because of MIB fears are full of BS because if they were in fear of the MIB they would not even say they had OU.

The MIB line is a cop out, if you have fears of the MIB then don't say you have an OU device because if you do you will draw suspicion. It's contradictory and contradictions means, things don't add up.

Tito should Marry Zilano, they are almost identical, or would he be marrying him/herself. hahahaha 

Sheez Louise.