Stanley Meyer Explained

[h20power]

I for one know that the Gas Processor is the most important part of Stanley Meyer's technology for at the end of one of his patents he says it can be used with any type of fuel, and as we have all seen that the Gas Processor can be driven by any high frequency switching type transformer as the MIT video demonstraited. Without the Gas Processor you can get no thermo explosive energy all you will get is 286 kJ/mol or perhapes a bit more if hho is produced. But that is no where near the energy content of gasolines 4k-5k kJ/mol depending on the grade used. Remember it all comes down to energy flux density and water for fuel with the Gas Processor has far more energy content than fossile fuels.

And kinesisfilms please don't talk to him for he is not worth it lets just run right over him for we are all making great progress right now I for one am not going back for road kill

h2opower

[Phantasm]

WOW...

This is really a disheartening read

I really gotta say we've got our hearts in the wrong place with all the bickering going on here... There seems to be a lot of egos running a lot of the posts here :\ I thought the prupose of this forum was to AID in the R&D process for these devices.

@h20power

Firstly - A huge thanks to the obvious hours upon hours of research you've done in this area.

I hear what youre saying that the concepts involved with building these devices should be understood by the builders before we attempt to build them - as such, we should do the research and learn the concepts before building.

even if the logic holds for that, I dont think its the right way to go - we can learn by talking about this and reading schematics just as well as we can learn by reading the publications, patents and read up on fundamentals of the science involved here as you have.

My quesitons is - why waste all that time? Youve boiled it all down already - why go through the process again? It just doesnt seem right to come here and release some information and then withold some because its better that we learn for ourselves.

In reality, a lot of discoveries that became the threshold of a big breaktrhough happen by chance anyhow - they happen when people experiment and discover for themselves how things work. Its for this reason that inventors come up with their own verbiage for the concepts theyve indentified that are at play within their devices.

Some of us are inventors - some of us are experimenters, some of us are just interested in alternative energy - the bottom line is, not all of us are capable of investing the time and money to build designs and testing them nedlessly. It IS needless if someone else can speak from experience or from knowldege on the subject thats needed.

You've said that these people are not suited to this field of work if they do not have the resources to invest. Well, frankly, I disagree - everyone who has a heart for helping the planet is useful on this website - Teach them to fish, and they'll teach others for you. If I show your average joe how to build an OU device - even if he doesnt understand it - as long as I'm able to communicate how to replicate the design and what pitfalls/safety issues to watch for - then there's another happy person who can now help their family weather the coming storm.

We really are talking about the lives and well being of humanity when talking about the far reaching implications that renuable alternative energy can afford. Why waste time with all this elitism? I have to strongly agree with those who have said that now is not the time for homework.

(I'm not saying we should disregard the science behind the subject, but instead, bring it front row center into the discussion instead of asking us to sort it out for ourselves)

-

As for the rest of you people being critical of eachother over spelling or being ciritcal of the presentation of arguments... all that is irrelevant - as long as we know what the message is, it is not necessary to criticize the quality.

we all bring different tools to the table here - You may not feel that theyre all useful but, why not see how we can make them useful instead of just saying theyre not suited to research - after all - anyone who makes an honest effort to contribute here can be helpful.

Edit: Almost forgot - Huge props @Farrah Day - I'm with you!

[triffid]

In spite of the bickering here,I can still pull water out of thin air and create a system for refueling a water powered car automatically.Now you guys just need to recreate Stanley Meyer's device for pulling water apart.My design could be used to refuel as a car is sitting or running 24/7.Triffid

[dankie]

In spite of the bickering here,I can still pull water out of thin air and create a system for refueling a water powered car automatically.Now you guys just need to recreate Stanley Meyer's device for pulling water apart.My design could be used to refuel as a car is sitting or running 24/7.Triffid

Make a video and a guide on how to make your thing .

[Phantasm]

Sounds like Triffid could be using a similar setup to whats used in a dehumidifyer to pull water out of the air.

Simply put, a peltier element will work to produce a cold surface for condensation to accumulate..

check this out for some more ideas:

http://www.ecoloblue.com/en/home-office