Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

[Michelinho]

Hi all,

This whole thread is funny and tragic.

Funny because people are debating senselessly something they do not comprehend.

Tragic because some of those same people are losing their time trying to replicate something they do not comprehend.

Mylow magnetic motor works but it has nothing to do with Howard Johnson's work. I am not even sure Mylow knows why it works. So trying to get him to tell you is also senseless and blindly trying to copy what he did without knowing all the constraints is USELESS.

Just tell yourself it is a fake and go back to research, once that is done, we can go back to a more "normal" life.

Take care all,

Michel

[nyctuber]

Hi all,

This whole thread is funny and tragic.

Funny because people are debating senselessly something they do not comprehend.

Tragic because some of those same people are losing their time trying to replicate something they do not comprehend.

Mylow magnetic motor works but it has nothing to do with Howard Johnson's work. I am not even sure Mylow knows why it works. So trying to get him to tell you is also senseless and blindly trying to copy what he did without knowing all the constraints is USELESS.

Just tell yourself it is a fake and go back to research, once that is done, we can go back to a more "normal" life.

Take care all,

Michel

Mylow doesn't claim to know how it works. He studied HJ's design and tried to replicate it. Sometimes, this method leads to something useful, usually not. He's also applied what limited scientific method he knows to the project. Give the guy a break.

[nyctuber]

New Mylow vid  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3F2pw-JPD4o&feature=channel_page

[joe_1001101]

Just a suggestive point of view, this story seems to lose its scientific objectivity, at least it seems to have no new scientific evidence to support this discovery.

I encourage people who want to make copies of Mylow videos to do it.

They are all still available at this Backup page.
http://www.youtube.com/user/LRCan1

But in the event that no new scientific evidence does surface prior to 1 May 2009, these videos will be removed.
So make backup copy or a new backup page if you have the desire to kept all of them.

LightRider

   

LightRider,

You have done a good job in your computer analysis.  Isn't there something we can do to really analyze the videos, so there are no more questions from any of us?    It seems several videos of a wheel spinning analyzed by the right, top notch people, like you:)  would give us the correct answer, good or bad. 

Maybe if you did another analysis, but on video #6, around 9:11 to 9:15

Thoughts?

Thanks,
Joe

[LightRider]

LightRider,

You have done a good job in your computer analysis.  Isn't there something we can do to really analyze the videos, so there are no more questions from any of us?    It seems several videos of a wheel spinning analyzed by the right, top notch people, would give us the correct answer, good or bad. 

Thoughts?

Thanks,
Joe

Thanks Joe,

   
The original video files could allow a more rigorous analysis by reducing the errors due to processing video. The video # 41b (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocZ6y0o3Nkk) seemed the best candidate for the analysis due to the fixed position of the camera and the duration of the motor running on a continuous basis. The first analysis (http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7039.msg168844#msg168844) is based on optical recognition of the position of the magnets (motion detector / light) recorded from the video on youtube. The data thus obtained is probably very close to youtube video. But it is more likely that this video analyzed is degraded compared to the original video (the video file directly from the camera Mylow). Despite the possible degradation of the video questions remain.

Why there seems to have decelerations?
Why decelerations appears to be composed of a constant succession of samples, each of them slower than the one before (in a degraded video)?
Why, it seems, there is not a place in the video #41b where the velocity is really constant?
Why amplitude between the deceleration and acceleration of a single test seems to be so great ?
What are the possible factors that would created these amplitudes and... seem to consist of several data consistent with these variations?
Why 1 / 3 of the video appears to be a phase of deceleration?

LightRider