Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

[Yucca]

@Yucca
I just gave you a post with the very same graph you believe concludes it not working with an explanation of exactly why to could get the same graph even if it was working.

Maybe if you weren't all ears and had some eyes too.......
(Yea some bad humor)

It would help if you mentioned the post number, I don't have time to read all this thread, it grows to fast. do you mean this post:

I think some of this video analysis stuff is darn good!

If you look at the one below you can actually see, just before the green line, the decline just before it enters the stator area and then the initial acceleration as it starts in, then the little dip about in the midpoint of the rotor magnets then the large kick at the end where all the work is done!

You can tell it's not level and the large kick at the end is doing most of the work because of the larger rounded area at the top of the peak where it is pushing it up a slope.

It then slows down quickly as it continues to climb the grade and then the final acceleration as it swings down the grade and back toward the stator area.

We cannot observe the stator/rotor interaction curve in isolation on the graph, we must first substract the one cycle per rev sinusoid from the entire curve. Then we will be left with the rotor/stator interaction curve. Perhaps then we could integrate the remaining function to see if its positive (COP>1) or more likely negative (COP<1).

[RunningBare]

You truly have no concept do you?
We are talking FIRE2.0 here, whats not to accept?, please, give me free energy!

As for the rest of your argument, as you say, it is pointless to attempt arguing with a closed mind, but one thing I can be certain of, this whole Mylow affair will either fade away to nothing or he will be caught with his pants around his ankle, personally I hope it's the former, he has had enough attention IMHO.

@RB
Guys are just grabbing at straws because this is just too much to accept. Understandable but eventually, very tiring.

[TinselKoala]

"If you want to prove it is a fake, then go home, do your hours and hours and hours of homework and come back with a totally convincing, well founded and well explained argument of why it is a fake. Don't just come here, fly a graph and shout it's fake. Man."

Astounding statement, Watts. You are asking for something that has been done over and over again here right in front of you. You don't want to see the logic of the explanations that have been presented; it seems likely that you don't even read some of them or think deeply about them. But don't accuse people like me or Yucca or the many others who have, indeed, done hours and hours and hours of homework, REAL homework, and who have taken real data,  of not doing those things. We've done them and more, and we've been able to show many discrepancies that Mylow has chosen not to explain. If you think that a motor and battery and control system strong enough to turn Mylow's wheel for over an hour, could NOT be concealed even inside the small stub axle unit, I'd like to show you something that's come out of my hours and hours of homework. But I won't, just take my word for it, it can be done, not easily but certainly.
The instrumental data and graphs are the best data we've got and the interpretations could in fact be wrong--but it would be soo easy to prove the interpretations of fakery wrong, on Mylow's part, simply by showing the results of a few simple control experiments.
And have you learned about magnets from Mylow himself, or from the other people who are posting results on these threads? The only thing I can see that Mylow could have taught you about magnets is that their dimensions vary by more than the implied dimensional tolerances in his device.

[RunningBare]

Btw, I believe you are Mylow just as you believe I'm Pirate, so your responses are not credible 

@RB

[Yucca]

@TK, Great rig you've got there, great vid!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FdrhC1UdDyM