Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

[Digjam]

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mylow_magmo/message/1307

Pay attention to the language and spelling of the
email supposedly from Mylow.

Sounds more like Bedini speak to me.

[ellubpt]

@RB

Sorry but I will have to disagree. My first stance was one of skepticism due to the wheel base not being taken apart. Then it was taken apart and still showed to work. There is nothing concrete in all the pages on this thread that can fully support the notion that Mylow is a fake. NOTHING after 321 pages of all sorts of this and that, name calling, you name it, nothing in the collection of items supporting this is fake can stand up on its own. On the other side, Mylow has done more then enough to show it is real. He has gone above and beyond what anyone else has every shown on their device. So yes, I am a believer because I trust my own intellect, power of observation and also my logically thinking says this guy wants to show us something new. That's what this forum is for.

I have debunked my fair share of fakes on this forum so I do not need a tutorial on how to detect or observe. When something is fake, there is always a way to see it. But in Mylows case, aside form attacking normal things, no one here is able to show this to be a fake. Guys are just grabbing at straws because this is just too much to accept. Understandable but eventually, very tiring.

I think I have also done my fair share of observations on many other devices including the TPUs to have honed some level of skill in this area.

If you want to prove it is a fake, then go home, do your hours and hours and hours of homework and come back with a totally convincing, well founded and well explained argument of why it is a fake. Don't just come here, fly a graph and shout it's fake. Man.

Cripes I have already learned more about magnets with Mylow then I would have alone. So just there, I consider myself having GAINED something and not having lost something.

How could you possibly "moderate" this forum when you have such a vocal bias in favor of MYlows motor being "real" based only on viewing videos?

Is that even remotely logical?

[ellubpt]

This ENTIRE thread exists for soley 1 reason.

Mylow CLAIMED TO HAVE REPLICATE THE HOWARD JOHNSON MOTOR.

Essentially that leaves only 1 question.

PROVE IT.

MYLOW made the claim, the burden is on him. He has dodged it at every turn going on three months now.

There is nothing but video after video which proves nothing. Refusal to allow confirmation of the claim speaks volumes.
There is no point at all to even having a thread based on such a SIGNIFICANT CLAIM. A claim made by MYLOW, who refuses it to be verified and spends months posting repetitive videos making the same claim, over and over they are all useless.

Make the claim = back it up.

Squirm your way out of it = suspicion.

Period.

Quit acting surprised and insulted because EVERYBODY just doesn't "take your word for it".

[ellubpt]

This is pretty ironic. Sterling Allan, in releasing Mylow's plans, has this statement on the PESWiki site on the "Criteria to Claim "First Independent Replication of Mylow's All-Magnet Motor:"

3. Have your motor validated by a qualified individual or group that is willing to make their certification made public

Repeatedly this is ignored.
I am curious as to why??


The simple answer is , make claim and back it up.
All the crying and stories and persecution and everything else means = 0.

You made a very outstanding claim which goes in contradiction to all known physics.
PROVE IT. That's all.
No more videos, prove it.

From this site: http://www.pureenergysystems.com/store/MylowMagnetMotor_plans/index.html#Version2.1_manual

And yet no such criteria has been established for Mylow himself.

[Giga]

Just a quick questin to the Admin? have this site ever seen traffic like this befor mylow?