Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

[FreeEnergyTruth]

@Queue

Your magnets (the one's at the top of the page on your site) are the closest I've yet seen in appearance to MYLOWs rotor mags.  The channel cut out seems to be of the same size also and maybe that's the important part in his device?

[AbbaRue]

The most interesting point about the video showing the magnets effect on iron powder:
it appears that the left side of the magnet is much weaker the the right side.
If this is true then this is the first time I have witnessed a magnet with one pole weaker then the other.
It actually looks like a one poled magnet.
According to standard magnetic theory this shouldn't be possible. As far as I know anyway.
A strange shaped magnet could have the magnetic field on one side following a different path but not weaker then the other.
If I'm wrong about this please correct me with some kind of reference, I still have lots to learn. 

[queue]

Cutest cat.Seems she (looks like a girl) can't wait either to see the overunity machine crunching. Looks like she's coming up with the answer any moment.

Very perceptive  . . she is a girl !
i tried to chase her away to take the pic
but something anew in her space .. she would have nothing of that !

Queue.
From where did you source your magnets??

Most are from this catalog .. Various tool companies in the US and Canada will carry them too.
i got mine from a tooling supply company in Ottawa Canada.
http://www.eclipse-magnetics.co.uk/

[Omnibus]

@Grimer,

I think you should kick in there and straighten up that poor fellow @joshs about his error in understanding the recoverable energy stored in permanent magnets. @vibrator is trying to explain it to him carefully in various ways but @joshs just doesn’t get it. Demagnetization of a permanent magnet requires energy input, a PM isn’t an energy reservoir that can be discharged like a capacitor and do work, correct? Please tell him that in order to demagnetize a permanent magnet one needs either to bang it (repeatedly) on the floor, heat it up to its Curie point or apply a counter H equal to its coercive force. All this requires work to be done, that is, energy to be spent, correct? Also, a permanent magnet isn’t an electromagnet, which @joshs so much likes to liken it to. And even in the ideal case of a magnetic field created by current flowing in a superconductor, to demagnetize it one needs a back-H.

P.S. Edited, after seeing @Grimer's reply, to read "poor fellow @joshs" rather than just "fellow @joshs".

[Omnibus]

@AbbaRue,

Interestingly, way back during the times of Steorn brouhaha we were discussing the quasi-one-pole reshaping of their field as the solution. There was this 5-magnet array whose name escapes me now which creates such quasi-one-pole magnetic field. If you go back in this thread I mentioned it to Stefan as a possibility here as well. Would be interesting if that’s the case here too.