Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Dissociation of the Water Molecule

Started by Farrah Day, March 17, 2009, 10:22:06 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

jibbguy

@ Newbie use your marvelous research skills and find out.... Lol, or were you accusing my of lying? "Combative" is often defined as: "Having the nerve to disagree with me" ;)

@ Farrah : Thx for the comment, it was rather illuminating to the others here i think.. And better than any reply i could have made lol.

newbie123

Quote from: jibbguy on May 14, 2009, 04:02:51 PM
@ Newbie use your marvelous research skills and find out.... Lol, or were you accusing my of lying? "Combative" is often defined as: "Having the nerve to disagree with me" ;)

Read what you just wrote and tell me that isn't "combative"....  C'mon now.. Grow up.     
Until you can measure it, arguing about something can be many things.. But science is not one of them.

Farrah Day

http://www.opednews.com/articles/life_a_jibbguy_080415_brown_s_gas__28_22hho_22_29_.htm

I assume this is you Jibby.

Guess I had you labelled right then... but you're also bordering on Crank. 

Funny, you say how deeply you researched the subject then give the credit of the discovery of hydroxy properties to Yull Brown. Google Dr. William Rhodes, or read one of my previous posts.

Your article is full of speculation and typical of a journalist, reporter or writer well out of their depth in this field. Do you always just take everything that is told to you as gospel... untill it is disproven? You're far more niave than I originally took you for.

You say that people you have spoken with in the past make me look like a retard - what in heavens name did they make of you then?

You appear to be living in your own little fantasy world, where science can be disregarded for the greater good of the planet. Get real!
Farrah Day

"It's what you learn after you know it all that counts"

jibbguy

@ Farrah: Thx for your "Opinion". Waiting to see your article debunking it, though... ;)

As for who discovered Brown's Gas, it was known for over well over a hundred years; but he was the first to commercialize it.... Perhaps you need to do some more research (oh thats right, i forgot: Your negative opinions are all that matter, and should be enough to convince us, so who needs research?) .

Here's a suggestion: Try to look upon some new ideas without trying to tear them down. I know it must hard for you... But you might even find it intellectually satisfying. You know, your own self-worth IS NOT tied to attempting to destruct others'.... And that will lead to a very bleak life.

@ Newbie: Actually i was making a little joke in referring to your earlier scurrilous accusations against the late Dr. John Kanzius (...which proved rather ill-advised in the end, no?).

Well, i'm not dead, i can reply just fine, so i don't mind so much when you turn your attacks to me ;)

newbie123

Quote from: jibbguy on May 14, 2009, 06:21:27 PM

@ Newbie: Actually i was making a little joke in referring to your earlier scurrilous accusations against the late Dr. John Kanzius (...which proved rather ill-advised in the end, no?).

The skepticism,  that you call  "scurrilous accusations"  still stands,   as does  "Replications (meaning more than 1-2)  = Proof" ...   to  the science community, and me as well. 

Do you see how you are jumping to conclusions here, and twisting the truth?   And apparently you do the same in  your articles...

Until you can measure it, arguing about something can be many things.. But science is not one of them.