Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

Started by Mannix, January 30, 2006, 06:18:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 39 Guests are viewing this topic.

jacob

Quote from: tao on October 14, 2006, 03:10:43 PM
Quote from: jacob on October 14, 2006, 02:55:55 PM
Hi Tao,

No, I am not suggesting this, neither am I dangling a carrot. I am just honestly reacting to a post that was adressed to me.

Regards,

Jacob

Hi Jacob,

I honestly respect that. Fine, allow me to ask a question then.

Have you ever seen a Steve Mark device in person, and if not, are you basing the knowledge about which you could go public, on your personal theories which you consider facts or on the insight or knowledge of someone who knows Steven Mark's devices?

tao


Hi Tao,

The answer to your question is C (on the insight or knowledge of someone who knows Steven Mark's devices)

Regards,

Jacob


gn0stik

Jacob, free energy would destroy any possiblity of Manufacturing Monopoly by China. It would mean other countries could compete because of a lowering of overhead. People were saying the same thing about Japan, and Taiwan 20 years ago. China will make enough money that their decaying communist structure will eventually collapse, and capitalism will rule the day, bringing incomes up, placing them in the same place it has placed everyone else. People will want too much money to do the jobs they did before and it will just not work. Korea has a thousand times more staying power in that arena than china does. Next it will be South American communists that fill the vaccum that china leaves when their death rattle finally subsides. Chavez is already ramping up.

It would also mean that countries who were never players on the world stage could be. Imagine what would happen if Africa could water their deserts. Imagine if NK had no excuse to build nuclear reactors.. They would have no excuse to persue ANY NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY.. free energy would be abundant, and hence no stepladder to tactical nuclear research under the guise of energy research.

It would get worse before it got better, yes. But no solution to the worlds problems will just meander into utopia. We have to work for it. It's delusional to think that we can get out of this corner we've painted ourselves into without getting paint on our socks.

The ULITMATE good is the end goal. That's what we need to focus on, not the uncomfortable reality that a shift geopolitical concerns will take place. It will cause just as much good as bad in that arena. It will create far more wealth than poverty, and that's why it's being opressed. Energy = wealth. The powers that be do not want people printing their own money.. No matter what form it comes in.

So. I'd like to hear what you know about the device Jacob. We've posted about 200 pages this last month. I hold no hostility to you in this area. I'd just like to hear it. And who it came from.




dutchy1966

@Tao,

first.....
I've studied your drawings of how the tpu could work and think you might be near. Just about your second drawing i have a remark.
I think it can't work that way because the flux of the inner control coils wouldn't go back around the outside of the same coil. Instead there would be just one big flux going around the toroid (the flux from one control coil would just link up with the next one).
So, in my opinion you're first drawing makes much more sense.

second....
It seems fairly easy to test your theory by winding two (opposite) coils and put a wire (collector) through it. Pulse it, and see if you can measure anything on the collector wire. Basicly that would just be an outcut of the toroid......

Maybe someone that has the equipment can test it.....

regards Dutchy

giantkiller

@marco
Hi, I went to google and saw the video. The 4th part was impressive. Just to recap can you post a schematic with the coil specs and the metals involved for the for step. I am having trouble finding iron wire here in Denver.
Thanks.

supersam

tao,

don't get me wrong, i really like your setup!!!!

giantkiller,

i think your three d is AWSOME!!!!  could you picture it with the two windings connecting in the center of the toroid, and the collector wire wrapped tirht around the inside?  i think then you will have something.  i am not talking tightly wound, but 1.618 larger diameter on the inside of your first looped coil to your horizontal, main collector and then 1.618 larger diamter for your outer looped coil greater than the middle.  then i think you will have something.  then connect your outer coil and inner coil through dave's first two parrellel transformers, and i think you will have something.

lol
sam