The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

[jacob]

"YES THERE IS A ROTATING FEILD WHICH CAUSES ELECTRONS TO FLOW IN COPER WIRE AND BE USED TO PROVIDE USEFULL WORK FORSE.
SINCERELY,
SM."


Well, while were analyzing the above quote, look at : ""YES THERE IS A ROTATING FEILD WHICH CAUSES ELECTRONS TO FLOW IN COPER WIRE ", what do you think Steven means by that, that the FIELD itself is what causes the electrons to flow in the wire? Or that a rotating field generates energy that is then used to cause a potential difference across said wire, thereby making electrons flow?

Maybe it is time to expand a little bit on this subject. I have already done it briefly, but it seems to have been overlooked. So let's go over this again... This stuff is important

What are the kicks

When an EMF is applied across a circuit, the charged particles (i.e.: electrons) are set in motion in a compounded streptoidal movement. A streptoid is like a spiral. So we first have a main spiral (remember the skin effect). But if you close up on the spiralling "line", you can see that although it may look like a solid line from afar, it is itself a spiral. Then, if you look closer once again at that second spiral, you'll see a third one and so on.

This compounded streptoidal motion causes multiple synchronized rotational magnetic fields to appear within the conductor. The more important the current flow, the more of these rotational magnetic fields are produced because more particles are involved.

Now, as the speed of the particles increases (or decreases if we are interrupting the flow), the rotational frequency of these magnetic fields also increases or decreases. At some point, this rotational frequency becomes resonant with the earth magnetic field and it is at this very moment that, for a split second, energy is transferred from the earth magnetic field to the conductor. This is the kick.

Applying this to the TPU

In the TPU, we are are also creating a rotational magnetic field. The trick is simply to rotate this field at the correct frequency. When this frequency is reached, we have a state of magnetic resonance "within the space of the collector coils". Remember what SM said about the compass when the TPU reaches it's designed optimum state: its needle stops. This is similar to what can be observed when a signal generator is connected to a parallel LC circuit. The current that flows from the generator to the tank virtually stops when the resonant frequency of the circuit is reached. The same is indicated by the compass needle when the rotational magnetic field becomes resonant. And when this condition happens, bingo! You have just created a condition "WHICH CAUSES ELECTRONS TO FLOW IN COPPER WIRE AND BE USED TO PROVIDE USEFULL WORK FORCE". Lots of current!

Regards,

Jacob

[giantkiller]

"YES THERE IS A ROTATING FEILD WHICH CAUSES ELECTRONS TO FLOW IN COPER WIRE AND BE USED TO PROVIDE USEFULL WORK FORSE.
SINCERELY,
SM."

This is what I'm experimenting with right now, no results yet:

Visualize that experiment with a piece of wire and a magnet. Run the magnet lenghtwise to the wire and observe the voltage pulse generated in the wire.

Make the wire into a loop and run the magnet along the loop. Same effect.
Increase the magnet speed to increase the voltage. Pulse width is decreased.

Use more magnets, say four, equally spaced. You'll get four pulses in the wire loop.
Adjust the rotation speed to get pulse superposition.

Use several control coils to simulate the magnets running along the loop.
Make more loops to increase the voltage, as SM said. (Short wires in series.)

Adjust the frequency and pulse width to get pulse superposition ("bigger kicks").
Use more than one frequency to get more pulses, maybe interleaved.

Anyone doing similar experiments?

Kosh

Hi all,

I am still getting the coil driver side of my circuit working. Last step. I implemented an incorrect design at this stage. Tonight, though I move on. With my circuit I will be able to perform what you speak about. I am thinking about a 4 turn, 10cm, 12 gauge collector, with 4 segment 16 gauge controls. I am not sure if # or turns matters on the control but I will wind loosely to around 1/2 in PVC pipe to accomodate changes in the collector specs.
Does this sound good? RFC The current designs and test have been great!
@ Marco, i start out with copper and then try iron.
I also have an idea to take a length of iron pipe and cut a section out length wise to turn it into a 1 turn iron coil / jacket that has an electrical connection from both sides of the gap for freq tests?
Also part of my slow down has been I am putting in a new kitchen floor.

--giantkiller. Lets keep moving.

[Jdo300]

Dave, I have also noticed this 4X amplification effect in the little transformer I have been playing around with! When I tuned it to it's 'sweet spot' the 9.2 volt input I had going in turned into about 37 volts coming out! And the amplification was pretty stable at that value! Keep in mind that I was using a 1:1 toroidal transformer in this case which was pulsed with square waves using only one wire!!

God Bless,
Jason O

Jason,

Would you be so kind as to draw what you've done. I like to test that too. What exactly was the input signal (9.2 volts pulsed dc from a signal generator? What frequency?)
Does this mean that you're not drawing any power from the source since you only have one wire connected?

Regards,

Dutchy

Hi Dutchy,

Yes that is right, by using only one wire from my function generator to the transformer; my understanding is that there is no current flow since there is not a complete circuit. Also my circuit is not grounded to an earth ground anywhere. (Stefan did mention something about capacitive coupling being a posable way current was transferred but I'm not sure of that). I did actually post a circuit diagram and information about the specific transformer I used a while back but it seems that people either missed the post or ignored it. I think that it is significant that I can actually get an appreciable current output with nothing but a fluctuating voltage potential as the input. I also posted some videos of my original experiment where I discovered this effect. Though I was using some diodes in a setup I was testing for something completely different (it was an accident that I even found the effect). Here are the links to my original posts about both my setups:

Post about my diode circuit:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,712.msg14080.html#msg14080

Demo Videos of the circuit:
http://overunity.com/jason/

Posts about my Transformer circuit
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,712.msg12399.html#msg12399

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,712.msg14087.html#msg14087

Post with the circuit diagram
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,712.msg14101.html#msg14101

I can't seem to find the post where I posted the pictures of the transformer but since the upload folder is still full, e-mail me (Jdo300@sbcglobal.net) and I'll be happy to send you the pictures.

@jacob

Awesome Insights about the inrush current in a wire! This proves my circuit in a sense because if you think about it, the only thing driving the electrons forward in the wire is the potential difference created inside the wire by the EMF (aka voltage potential) produced by the moving magnet. So I can create an EMF in my wire without using a ground and still create radiant energy bursts (via. Longitudinal waves) which are picked up in the secondary of the transformer. As I stated many times in my early posts, the setup I used is very frequency sensitive; and I noticed that the *sweet spot* frequency was determined by the size transformer/coil that I used. The larger transformers worked at a much lower frequency than the smaller transformers! I also developed a simple method to find the sweet spot by looking at the scope screen. When I make my demo video of the transformer, I?ll show how the output waveform changes as the sweet spot frequency is found. It is very obvious because the voltage wave form jumps up at the frequency.

God Bless,
Jason O

[raburgeson]

Well I've been trying to tune my main test TPU. I tried litz packed to much capacitance. My last modification is using 16 gauge wire and I have top to bottom 47.6 pF, top to center 48.3 pF, and center to bottom 48.8 pF. I hope this is close enough, I took some pics of my z-meter but I won't bore you with them. I suspect we have to learn to tune this curcuit correctly. I've been running the ends out for taps and including these measurements in my notes. I think the capacitance of the cores is an important value, I've also been carefully counting the wraps on the collectors and global wraps as well. I think each section needs to look electronically balanced. Still I haven't been able to math predict or apply math to it yet. has anyone else been able to do anything in this area yet?

[gn0stik]

Tao, I was wondering when you were gonna break out the Rhysmonic Cosmology. I read that stuff a while ago, and then again recently, and even bookmarked it. Then forgot about it, with work, and life and all, go figure..

With RC, a lot of the stuff we've been working on are thrown out. At least, a lot of the WHY is thrown out, and you have to do a logical transform to allow for the gravitometric additition of forces. The wire's capacitance in the TPU would mean a lot more than specific frequency. Not that frequency is unimportant now, it is, just not for the same reasons. Timing is now the main drive behind finding the right frequency.

It also explains perfectly the need for a magnet to start the reaction, why we have dc, with ac "hash", why the device won't work upside down, and how the excess energy enters the system.

But is it complete? Yes, and no. There is no specific reference to a "kick" phenomena that I remember being predicted in RC. However, it can be deduced rather easily, as it would be a simple case of scalars adding when "electrons are first caused to flow in a wire."

The scary thing about RC, is that it is as close to an all encompassing explanation for EVERYONE's over unity results as I've ever seen. From PMMs, to Gravity motors, to Solid state circuits, etc. You can quickly surmise that many people who had alternate theories about what was going on in their experiments, were only partly right. Leedskalnin's sacred geometry is easily seen in the rhysmonic vectors, and planes. Teslas radiant has more going on that he thought it did, Keely's sound related stuff starts to make sense when you do the proper expansion of the logic (sound is a scalar), etc.

pretty cool stuff, I encourage everyone to read Hodowanec's stuff. Also, perform the experiments if you have the ability.



Regards,
Rich