The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

[sparkman]

KOSH, regarding McFarland COOK coil. Thanks but I already collected all the information from that site when doing my early research on the device. If you have any other references I will be happy to look at them. This person did not use compounded Helices. He used lots of turns in standard solenoid form. Creating two helices from the same wire at right angles to each other is what I am referring to. This creates the two magnetic fields at right angles. The tone of the writer of this patent is another point. He sounds like a genuine experimenter just describing what he has found to be true. He doesn't really know why it works the way it does. Sorry to clog this thread, I just thought the magnetic fields working at right angles using a compound helical method of winding a coil is unique. Thanks also to Tishatang, glad you see what I am referring to.

[archon79]

People don't wan't free energy it seems.
As i see it, this device works.
There is only a short pulse used to distort the magnetic field.
When the magnetic field returns to normal, the energy of it doing so, is collected. Hence, at the same time the energy is used to put a spike into the other circuit. This goes round and round. It looks like a resonating circuit which amplifies itself.

This is as simple as it can be. but nobody seems to see this?

When I first saw the ReneRator, I thought this forum would be jumping all over it as the missing link, but they just ignored it.

The theory makes sense.

From a physical perspective, the ReneRator is closer to the SM device than anything anybody has found yet. The placements of the coils, the gap between them matches the physical pics we have of his device.

In the video of SM cutting up the coil, it seems that he was only showing one half of the device, probably so not to give too much away.

My theory - The SM devices with the black tape covering them are two coils places on top of each other, similar in design to the ReneRator with the outputs coil each collecting from the coil underneath on their particular side. And each side requires a magnet, just as in the SM videos.

The only thing that I don't understand is the theory behind why SM needed a solid state circuitry and frequency selector for his devices. Is it just to stop some sort of out of control oscillation? Or does it perform some required function that is actually needed to see energy output? Or is the circuit for just controlling the input pulses?

[sparkman]

Yes, Dave since the writer has already used electrical terminology to describe "inrush current", why would he use the word "kick" unless he meant some kind of mechanical reorientation. He could have said backrush current or back EMF or delayed return pulse.

[JackFrost]

@aupersam,

hey everyone,

lots of very smart, newbies.

thanks newbies,

lol
sam

Your a stupid dipshit, you know that?  That's why you will never figure it out.  Some newbie can come on here an spell it out to you and you still won't be able to see the light because your head is up your arse.  Just like the know it all's on the magnetic motor section of this forum - tell them exactly how to do it and they still can't figure it out, but the damn thing will keep spinning in front of me.

No wonder Mannix left.  People like you have created a "ship of fools".

"Freaks of nature" like you have never even heard of a scorch field (allows direct manipulation of the phi and A fields - aka time and space), much less have the balls to create one, but you think you will create a rotating magnetic field by hacking Telsa's old motor patent - ROFLMFAO!!!  Look at the SM's four coils.  The coils on opposite sides from each other experience the Lorentz Force between them - stick that in your pipe and smoke on it!  coils 1 and 3 attract each other, squeezing the output coil, - this "squeeze" alternates between 1-3 and 2-4.

BTW - that compass spinning in the center of a toroid with four coils on it is called a "toroidal torque motor" - been around for 100 years and it will never self-run.

So, I will say it one more time, since you are a bit thick: "mechanical oscillation"  

Read all about it:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/magfor.html
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/magint.html#c1
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/forwir.html#c1

Who's the newbie now, little "mr know it all"?

[archon79]

Perhaps I miss something, if I have, please explain where the extra energy will come from to replace the losses?

The law of conservation of energy blah blah states that there can never be extra energy to cover the losses. If I was to insist on demanding such an explanation then I must believe free energy devices do not exist. So why would I even be on this forum?