Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

Started by Mannix, January 30, 2006, 06:18:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

archon79

The other thing I was thinking of is the rumour that a battery is required to start the SM device. Don't dismiss the possibility - what if a small battery is just required to generate the initial input pulse or kick, which is then amplified through the system and kept in motion by the collapsing and expanding of the magnetic fields.

archon79

Quote from: ctglabs on November 02, 2006, 09:51:17 AM
Quote from: archon79 on November 02, 2006, 09:49:55 AM
Quote from: ctglabs on November 02, 2006, 09:38:13 AM

Perhaps I miss something, if I have, please explain where the extra energy will come from to replace the losses?


The law of conservation of energy blah blah states that there can never be extra energy to cover the losses. If I was to insist on demanding such an explanation then I must believe free energy devices do not exist. So why would I even be on this forum?

Very well, I clearly know nothing at all.

Please sir, show me your working Rene device.

So, if we beleive it can run with out covering the losses, what exactly will it run on, if its not energy in one form or another?


Regards,

Dave.

You know far more than me Dave and I enjoy all your posts as I learn something. But sometimes fresh perspective is needed and not to dismiss all possiblities. Huge effort has been expended in this forum exploring routes that were in the opposite direction of SM advice.

giantkiller

Hi everyone,

Think about this. We had copper and magnets before we had the water wheel. Then when we had all that, nobody put the magnets on the axils to swipe past the copper. Why? Same argument that Lister received when he talked about little creatures invading our bodies. The common cry of pomposity is "If you can't see it, it doesn't exist". And "Don't tell me! I got more power than you and I will call the shots".
Keep this thread going. Yes, let us bash our heads against our fists. Lets throw punches at others. Whatever it takes to break through our boundaries of ignorance. All of societies great achievements came from great people who had to Fight the good fight!
Hey, if it was easy, chimpanzees would be traveling in canoes!

--giantkiller. ;)

mflynn44

Quote from: ctglabs on November 02, 2006, 09:23:32 AM
If we look at this book SM mentions:

"The resistance of a cold fillament is one tenth that of a hot one, so the cold inrush current is ten times higher than the operating current.  The inrush current through the fillament interacts with the earth's magnetic field to produce  a small kick."

Now, this is the book SM tells us about and the book directly says the inrush current is caused by the resistance being lower, than its operating temperature.  This is the normal cause for inrush current, which is confirmed in this book too!

It does NOT say the inrush is caused by the earths field.  BUT INSTEAD it says the INRUSH IS CAUSED BY LOWER RESISTANCE IN THE FILLAMENT, WHICH THEN INTERACTS WITH THE EARTHS FIELD TO CAUSE A SMALL KICK!

So, I have been looking at this inrush issue all wrong.  There is definatly something else.


Dave.

Hello All,

I just started looking at this setup SM suggested using a high voltage center tapped transformer, a separate five volt filament transformer, a full-wave solid state rectifier, and a rectifier tube with a directly heated cathode. Sometime back I had bought two old radios from e-Bay. Both were Atwater Kent (a model 37 and a model 40) for less than $US100 for both.  They have high voltage center tapped transformers. I'm using a type 80 tube rectifier that came with one of the radios rather than the 5U4 SM recommends. I will experiment later with the 5U4; there are several of them around here someplace. When in operation there is a low pressure mercury plasma within the 5U4.

A related topic... My understanding is that the four bifilar coils are each loosely wrapped with another magnet wire coil and this magnet wire coil has a smaller magnet wire coil attached at one corner. This arrangement of three coils has to do with the "kick" we are searching for. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

starcruiser

Quote from: ctglabs on November 02, 2006, 12:37:11 PM
Quote from: mflynn44 on November 02, 2006, 12:34:11 PM
A related topic... My understanding is that the four bifilar coils are each loosely wrapped with another magnet wire coil and this magnet wire coil has a smaller magnet wire coil attached at one corner. This arrangement of three coils has to do with the "kick" we are searching for. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Hi, I must have missed that?  From what I can see we only know what we can see in the video.  SM has not comment on the small device, only the large one?

If it is so, its interesting because it confirms 90 degree coupling in the small device too.


Dave.

@Dave,

Makes me think SM was using the "Collector Coil" as a TDR line and timing (or just providing more and hoping) the reflections with the next pulse to cause a "Kick", I am figuring that as the reflected pulse comes back another pulse is sent off which passes and adds to the reflected pulse. Using a feedback coil one could create a gain situation I am thinking.

This seems to be what Kosh may be experiencing now with one control coil and the collector.

I know this is more "I think" or theory but we must use this to further our experiements right?

I am also theoriziong that with a TDR line for the collector (open coil) and using the Tesla generator wiring concept along with the outter collector (the coil that is wrapped around the whole torrid) would put us in resonace. I was looking at the patent and at Tao's diagram for the coils and was thinking, isn't the TPU a modification of tesla's Generator design? Take a look, the outter coil could be the armature only stationary. In the patent Tesla says that by slowing the rotation you could increase the curent produced. What if stopping it you would still generate power since the magnetic field is rotating but it would not be AC but a DC component now? (squeezing the hose)

Take a look at the armature coil orientation to the control coils in the patent, they are orientated as we understand transformer coupling. The control coils are 90 degrees to the core of the torrid but instead of containing the field with an iron core, the wire core allows it to radiate and with the TDR effect you can increase the field. strength.

Also by adding another collector to the setup, which is isolated it might also collect or be used as a feed back pickup to the signal source??

Some thoughts is all these are,  I am going to try these ideas out myself this weekend (I hope) gotta wind a new coil setup for this one.

I forgot to mention that the outer coil would be our power collector in this theory.

Regards,

Carl