The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

[PaulLowrance]

I would have to agree that SM3, SM6, & SM17 are good names. The wattage can easily change, but the diameter of a particular machine is fixed.

Those posts are spread across EVERY post that Mannix ever did. I have compiled all of SM's words into a text file that makes reading his words easy.

Tao,

Thanks. I can see Mannix's quotes of SM are valuable. Everyone should save these posts to their computer. I saved them, but it's not reliable as someone or group has been repeatedly hacking my machine ever since I started continuing my Magnetocaloric energy research. As a software engineer it's been close to 10 years that I've worked with computer & Internet security and after taking precautions I'm amazed as to how they are able to hack into my machine. I can watch their actions. It was just roughly a month ago that my entire HD was lost.

Anyhow, I wish Mannix would come back and post some more of SM.  I believe "other forums" was mentioned. If possible could you please (re)post the links where SM or Mannix has posted on other forums?

Also, if the difference frequency or interefernce or beat frequency of the two is 7.8Hz, is this able to somehow extract excess energy by connecting with the schumman resonance.

Dave,

I see you have also made the connection. I just don't see how any radiant energy from the Sun holds up. Here's what SM says, "YES NORBERT, WE DID TRY THEM SOUTH OF THE EQUATER,   THEY WORK IN REVERSE. CAN SOMEONE TELL ME WHY?"

According to SM's experiments, it is clear that his device needs to be pointing toward Earth. Also the 7.3 Hz mentioned by SM should be another huge giveaway.

Normally I wouldn't even bother mentioning that due to the weakness of the earths field, etc, but perhaps something else can go on when standing waves are involved?

Yes I agree. Anyone who has seen the power of resonance cannot dismiss it. Even the Mythbusters were astonished with the power of resonance. Just a precise miniscule tapping on a bridge can manifest into noticeable forces. In the hands of a genius such as Tesla then such miniscule forces become powerful. If we sent the right type of field around the Earth at the exact frequency and continually repeat then it is possible for such a weak field to become very powerful.

I have a theory that sounds good so far. If it's true I have no idea. In a nutshell, there could be a resonance between the device and the D-layer ionosphere and/or the top layer Mantel. This matches the 5 KHz resonance. This field would also spread horizontally around the globe and matches the 7.3 Hz. If this field is in resonance (builds up over time) then the field could become very strong. Since the device is in resonance with this field, it could very well experience a gyroscopic and inertia effect. When you move such a machine you are moving it out of alignment with the resonance field, which would cause resistance. To understand why this would occur we need to understand standing waves. Consider sand on a vibrating disc. There is a force on the sand to stay in nodes and away from the antinodes. Similarly, as SM moves his device he is essentially moving the entire resonance that has been building up over time. He is moving the away from the node and into the antinode. This would cause resistance. That could explain the inertia effect. The gyroscope effect could be explained by once again the magnetic material reacting to the antinode. Anyone who's placed a PM somewhat near another PM and then moved it sideways knows there's a force that wants to rotate the magnetic. That could explain the gyroscope effect.

It's just a theory. I think we need to find out if it is true and not be irresponsible. If the "free energy" is coming from some radiant energy source then it sounds safe. If the energy is being instantly moved from the mantel or D-layer then we seriously need to consider the consequences and be responsible. Personally I cannot take the position that others here might be hating or angry that anyone would even suggest such a thought. We need to also be responsible, find out what is really happening, and just be nice and work with everyone.

Kind regards,
Paul Lowrance

[hartiberlin]

I would have to agree that SM3, SM6, & SM17 are good names. The wattage can easily change, but the diameter of a particular machine is fixed.

Okay, let us keep these names, sounds good with the diameter
description.
Are these in inches = 2,54 cm ?

@Otto,
sounds good, what you are doing.
Yes, please try to wind another control coil around
the core and drive it with a different frequency and
see, if the current output from your rectifier will
go up !
Also you could connect a 10 or 100 Ohm resistor at your output
and measure the DC voltage at it, if you put a capacitor
across it, so you will see the output wattage !
Watts= DC-Voltage^2 / Resistorvalue

Then please compare it versus the input wattage from your 12 Volts DC source.
Many thanks.

Regards, Stefan.

[giantkiller]

The SM3, SM6, SM17 are in inches. Gotten from the stevennew.mp4

[giantkiller]

I too am wondering why 'three collector coils/wires is important' according to SM also hartiberlin AND how that all relates to this...

This is where my Radiant Theory covers more ground and is able to combine ALL that Steven described and is shown in the videos....

I merely posted my rotating magnetic field theory just to spark the minds of all the people who feel SM's devices work exclusively on rotating magnetic fields.......

Tao, what post/page# did you mention the rotating coils. I need to go back and read that.

I came up another theory about the SM3 & SM6

I had mentioned before that I felt the SMs were Tesla coils. You had mention that there are 3 coils. Well with those could one possibly build an air core Tesla coil by embedding the feedback coil (lets say 10 turns) inside a control coil (lets say 50 turns) inside the largest output coil (lets say 1000 turns)?
I say this because in the video that an SM6 has a slice cut out, there is just styrofoam/cork type filling. I did not see any thing that would match up with the diagram in the compiled posts of Steven Mark. That diagram show internal windings.
As always, I am open to be incorrect.

If we look for the sunlight, we shall see no shadows. Helen Keller.

[hartiberlin]

Quote
About the collector:
It is three separate coils of multi strand copper wire laid one on top of the other, not interleaved. Three is important. You can do many things with three coils. You can run them in parallel, you can run two in series and one in parallel, or etc.
You can run a separate frequency into each coil for better control on large power units if need be.
The control wiring is vertically wound in several segments around each of the horizontal collector coils. Other control wires are wound around all of the horizontal collector coils together.
Through the different control wire and coil wire arrangements you can keep complete control of the unit most of the time. However, you must have an emergency KILL switch. A way of cutting off all the control frequencies simultaneity. This kill switch must be, manual and also connected through a heat sensor buried within the collector coil. it should automatically stop the function of the unit before it self destructs on it's own. This is important for obvious reasons. Also the kill switch should also be connected to cut off whenever it measures over voltage. If that should ever happen, you would never have enough time to hit the kill switch before the inevitable explosion occurred.
You know, it is very similar to the idea of a long garden hose. Picture a hose with water in it. If you pick up one end and move along the length of the hose you will move the water constantly along in the direction you are moving. You could also squeeze the hose in the direction to move the water along as well. And you could do both to control the movement of the water more precisely. You can think of the movement of water as the movement of electrons through the collector coils.
I hope the things I share with you give you ideas about how my unit works. As you know, I am a great believer in understanding, not copying.
Sincerely,
SM.

Hi Tao,
I tried to search the whole forum here, but did not find this posted earlier ?
So this seems to be information that you have found somewhere else ?
I also could not remember having read it already before.
So where did you get it from ?
P.S. I think the search function over here might also have some
problems as it can not find some other sentences...
I will try to fix it soon with a fresh install of the forum software...
Many thanks.

Regards, Stefan.