The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

[Jdo300]

Hi Stefan and All,

It?s been a while since I have posted here, WOW lots of progress I see. GREAAT work Dave with your setup. I think you are definitely onto something here. I think I may have the solution to address all the input vs. output questions floating around. If we have problems figuring out if Dave is really drawing more power from the source to run the load, then how about running the load without drawing any power from the source at all.

This is what I think I have been able to do with my circuit setup. I have made two versions of it, one using only diodes and a piece of anything metal, and the other version uses a small 1:1 transformer (toroidal by the way). I have made a series of videos of the first circuit and I will be making a better video of the second one this week to post but I thought now would be the first time to introduce this.

I have been able to successfully generate enough power to run a series of LEDs using my first circuit. The only thing is that it runs at a much higher frequency then anything that SM was working with (4-6MHz), but I believe that this has to do with the length of wire that I am using to pull power into the circuit. I attached an image showing the circuit diagram for this first one and a scope shot of the input square wave before and after it was connected to the circuit. And I will upload each video in separate posts. Unfortunately, the camera I used at the time could only take 60 second videos so I had to make 5 separate parts to fit in all the demos. Oh, and they are in QuickTime too. I?ll explain my second circuit next after posting the videos. But I think this may hold the key to producing power without depleting the source. Either that or I have made some kind of weird radio receiver

God Bless,
Jason O

[gn0stik]

Ok I have a very simple question.

Let's take a closed end toroid e.g. 1000 turns 10 cm radius with a base harmonic for 3.5 MHz

Mark the turn at 12 o'clock as 0
and let's say the turn at 3:00 o'clock as 250 (going clock wise)

Next splice a wire on the 0 turn and a wire at the 250 turn

Next apply a jolt of potential to those 2 wires

Do we have 2 sets of currents going through the toroid?
One current from turn 0 to turn 250 clock wise ( through consecutive  turns 0, 1,2, ? 248,249,250 for a total of 250 turns and ? of the toroid)?

The other current from turn 0 to turn 250 counter clock wise (through consecutive  turns 0, 999, 998,?252,251,250 for a total of 750 turns or  the other ? of the toroid)?

Do we have 2 standing waves rushing through the toroid at opposite rotations at different frequencies and effectively amplifying each other when the amplitudes are in sync?

Shouldn?t there be splice location where max amplification at max freq results?

Possibly at exact opposites?, or some harmonic multiple divisor of 1000 (in the example above 1000 turns were used)
I keep thinking closed toroid since in that video the simplest design about 5" dia (the one he placed on the glass table) there seemed to be no outside power sources driving the toroid
Or maybe use a pm to kick start the proccess intead of an outside VA source.

Any insights will be appreciated. Thx

Well, judging by what SM has said, it's possible to do what you are describing, but, by other descriptions of his layout this is probably not what he's doing, at least in the larger device. The counter rotating fields could easily be accomplished in two separate sets of controls rather than the same wire.

By splicing, do you mean simply soldering a lead at the 250 point?  Or closing it completely, and soldering two on? At any rate, there's really no way to know exactly what would happen without actually doing it. Basically, correct me if I'm wrong, but you would just get a hot toroid, as you've just made a big heating element if it's completely closed. You have to have output somewhere, and if you have two input and two out put, you might as well just make a bifilar toroidal xformer and feed it different signals in opposite directions. I may be missing something here, or simply dind't understand you, however.


Rich

[hartiberlin]

Hi Jason,
seems to be "Avramenko plug",
what you have created there.
One wire electrical energy transfer
done by the Russian inventor Mr.Avramenko.

I also already tried something like this.
Works nicely, the only question is, if you can
extract some "free" electrons from the metal
and have more output this way.

The circuit is closed back to your function generator
capacitively, so what does your circuit draw
from the function generator ?

Regards, Stefan.

[gn0stik]

Hi Jason,
seems to be "Avramenko plug",
what you have created there.
One wire electrical energy transfer
done by the Russian inventor Mr.Avramenko.

I also already tried something like this.
Works nicely, the only question is, if you can
extract some "free" electrons from the metal
and have more output this way.

The circuit is closed back to your function generator
capacitively, so what does your circuit draw
from the function generator ?

Regards, Stefan.

Stephan, this looks nothing like an AFEP to me. At least the diagrams are completely different than the ones on naudins site.

@Dave, what happens when you feed t3 directly with the two signals? Without going through t1 and t2 first?
Do you have the ability to do that?

[hartiberlin]

Jason,
have a look at this:

http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/afep01.htm

If you make the metal bigger and bigger in area,
you could probably attract more free electrons from the air
and get some overunity !