MylowHJ Replication - Discussion

[Bobbotov]

That is proven science based on factual data...

Conversely do you mean this forum is like unknown science based on false data?

I think you are misunderstanding the fundamentals of science. It is a process or methodology not a monolithic thing. It's litany keeps evolving, expanding and modifying itself in accordance with new discoveries that are falsified, verified and replicated. If all of the information being dealt with is factual then the criteria for being addressed by science is an imminent possibility. There is nothing about free energy or over unity that cannot be dealt with by science unless you enter the realm of magic or pseudoscience. As to arguments over scientific sacred cows they are all facing the same test by falsification, verification and replication. In fact as the history of science shows, nothing is sacred that cannot be disproved on that basis.

[DHCP]

Conversely do you mean this forum is like unknown science based on false data?

I think you are misunderstanding the fundamentals of science. It is a process or methodology not a monolithic thing. It's litany keeps evolving, expanding and modifying itself in accordance with new discoveries that are falsified, verified and replicated. If all of the information being dealt with is factual then the criteria for being addressed by science is an imminent possibility. There is nothing about free energy or over unity that cannot be dealt with by science unless you enter the realm of magic or pseudoscience. As to arguments over scientific sacred cows they are all facing the same test by falsification, verification and replication. In fact as the history of science shows, nothing is sacred that cannot be disproved on that basis.

What?
I don't mind admitting I have no idea what you are on about, I simply tryed to state if you jump out of a plane with no shoot there is a high chance you won't survive as proved by physics & the fact's that not many do??
What has this got to do with OU?

[Bobbotov]

What?
I don't mind admitting I have no idea what you are on about, I simply tryed to state if you jump out of a plane with no shoot there is a high chance you won't survive as proved by physics & the fact's that not many do??
What has this got to do with OU?

Everything.

[BEP]

@AB Hammer

I second BEPs post.

Also, I think the guy saying this is a homopolar motor is totally wrong. Grease no grease, the drive is the magnets. I do not believe or can even comprehend how grease in a bearing will cause a rotational motion on the wheel. Actually, if Mylow has grease in his bearing, this will hinder rotation due to the friction at such low torque values. I just had that experience. lol

@wattsup

Actually, (and I think you know this) a roller bearing can act similar to a planetary gear - also like a clutch. I think he is right on the possibility but doubt it was used this way here.

What I don't understand  is I thought Mylow's bearing had the seals in it. Don't people know that is some serious drag? - far more than the grease!

@AB

I have no doubts about your position in this field. I have always read your posts with interest but you are beyond me in the gravity game 

[BEP]

BTW:

When you look at rotational speed from an angle the plot will show as a sine wave. Normally this has nothing to do with wobble or imbalance when viewing from a compressed video.

When you correct for the angle the speed plot is a fairly smooth increasing ramp. The burst in speed then should be seen correctly then with a gradual decrease in speed until passing under the stator again.

I don't know which will win out as they are not compatible... the string theory or the elliptical movement of the dot theory.

Some peeps are starting to see how aluminum fits into this.

Last thoughts for a while. I'm scheduled to be on a flight today and gone for some time.. Good Luck to the builders All!