"g" paradox...

[iacob alex]

   ...can be expressd with an elementary problem (test) : a rotating stick.

      Some expressive comments you can find at:   www.astrophysik.uni-kiel.de/~hhaertel/PUB/mathe_phys.pdf

     " Mathematics cannot express and answer to the question about the causality behind this process.There must be "something" besides gravity".

      A test (and calculus...) can be made for angles larger than 40 degrees (cos2/3).

      The essence of mathematics is to measure,but of physics is to explain "what?"...

             All the Bests! / Alex

[iacob alex]

   ...or "falling stick/chimney..." has a direct and essential connection with any spoke(let's say stick...) that falls and uses the power of gravity.

      Any design must have at least one spoke("stick") and a rim,or two spokes (in a lever/pendulum concept) or more,as you like...

      As you see,the "g" paradox problem, is inevitable ("is in the cards"),if we want to play reality,but not a vain product of the imagination.   

        All the Best! / Alex

[iacob alex]

...you can watch and understand ,in a more accurate manner,if you make a single click :   
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mi16ws35JIQ

        All the Best! / Alex

[onthecuttingedge2005]

...you can watch and understand ,in a more accurate manner,if you make a single click :   
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mi16ws35JIQ

        All the Best! / Alex

Very nice Gravity demo, Thanks!

Jerry

[iacob alex]

     Hi Jim!

I agree with you...but we have one more problem,if you watch the last message at "Self moving hoop"(   www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuTMYgQDUzs  ).
So,now we have two problems:

   -falling stick with pennies
   -Milkovic's pendulum
Anyway,in any attempt to imagine some designs,I think we must take into account the both situations.
  You know,the best teacher is reality...

        All the Best! / Alex