Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[WilbyInebriated]

Wilby, No, you are blatantly trolling, in violation of this site's TOS and the common internet definition of trolling. In addition, you are pointing out the SAME POINT over and over and over and over again, not new points.
Most of the "thirty pages" you keep referring to are YOU trolling and me teasing you. And you have absolutely no idea when I started testing what. You only know--or think you know--what I posted and when I posted it.
You haven't given any substantive criticism of my analyses at all. Nor have you pointed out any errors. You have just shown quotes from ME pointing out my own errors. Which, when I make them, I freely admit.
And once again: the issue here is the COP>17 overunity claim of Rosemary Ainslie. In regards to that claim, there is NO SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE in any of the mosfets that I have tried, as stated at the time. In regards to traditional engineering criteria, assuming that spikes are what you want (Aaron has flip-flopped on this several times) then the 2sk1548 is probably better, and I demonstrated this several times in the videos with side-by-side comparisons. But that issue is entirely my own. Most people have actually REFUSED to try any other mosfets, specifically avoiding the 2sk1548! So your entire argument involving my use or not of this mosfet is the flimsiest of straw men. The fact that you are so stuck on it indicates that you have even less of a real life than I do, and that is extremely pitiful.
And to top it off, you are simply wrong.

this is rich, glad i grabbed a chair right away. i know you didn't start with testing the irfpg50 as proper scientific method re: a replication would demand. and no, that wasn't what you stated at the time. i have shown this by quoting your post several times now. nor is it what was stated at the time by your sycophants, as i have shown also.
to top it off, didn't you say earlier that responding to me was an error? and here you are repeating what you have stated to be a known error repeatedly. this habit of yours isn't doing your credibility any favors...

you failed to provide any evidence of your "predicted by..." post, AGAIN. a baseless claim from the dancing bear.

[poynt99]

WI,

Why are you here?

It's obvious you are no dummy, and I apologize for calling you the "R" word.

But why are you being so antagonistic? Have you nothing positive to contribute rather than bantering on about details that have no real bearing on things?

OK, so TK has made some mistakes, I have made some mistakes, MH has made some mistakes, Harvey has made some mistakes, Hoppy...etc. We've all made some mistakes, and most have admitted them. Have you not made any mistakes?

Let's move on from the antagonistic banter as your points have been duly noted.

What is your take on Aaron's Test Spreadsheet? What's your take on RMS measurements at the load, and DC measurements at the shunt?

Cheers,
.99

[forest]

I see that you are ignoring important questions...
This thread is horrible.Better close it.

[Hoppy]

@Hoppy: good, that at least reduces the chances of the dirty pot. I suppose I'll have to build it after all. Can you be specific as to which of Aaron's circuits you are using? I've lost count, so a link to the actual diagram would be nice.
Did you try several different 555 chips in there with the same or similar control settings? There can be partial failures as well as large differences between chips.
I'd still like to see a scope shot if you can manage to make it hold still long enough.

TK

Its the 10th August revision. (EE forum post 1927).

I did try various chips including the 7555.

I have attached two scope shots both taken at 0.1mS. The first is the 'normal' waveform and the second is where the load starts to draw a heavy current.

Hoppy

[Hoppy]

EDIT: Posting error.

Hoppy