Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[poynt99]

@Fuzzytomcat, Luc, etc.

Who was it that had some extra IRFPG50's they could sell?

Rose has agreed to consider my test results even though my resistor has an inductance of 29uH, as opposed to the specified 8.64uH. For goodness sake though, Aaron's is a whopping 96uH which is more than 10x the amount, and she seems quite happy with Aaron's results so far, whatever those results may in fact be 

Anyway, I'll be building and testing the circuit myself, after my first video is completed. Just an interesting note regarding scope calibration, and in particular the Tek SPC calibration on my scope--before and after the calibration, the DC offset changed a whopping 22mV and it started at the negative side! 

.99

[MileHigh]

.99:

>>>
All Danotherm Resistors can be equiped with a thermal model, which
makes it possible to calculate the TEMPERATURE RISE during a
specified load. Particularly by pulse loads it is possible to simulate the
temperature rise by using a programme as Pspice. You can either ask
DANOTHERM to do a simulation or ask for the thermal model of your
resistor to do the simulation yourself.
>>>

I learn something new every day!

MileHigh

[poynt99]

Hi MH,

Yes I saw that in the spec. There's very little you can't do in SPICE 

I wonder if they would provide the thermal model just for asking? Here is the complete part number GL used btw:

GRF20/100L 10R. They are about $30 from their website.

.99

[powercat]

Cat - can you advance one reason why Aaron should oblige you on this matter?  I'd sooner recommend that he send the circuits to different universities for evaluation.  I think Aaron's interest in persuading contributors here is long over and gone.

Rosemary Rosemary
One reason= if the claim is true, why not, to prove it really is OU.
It seems so obvious there is no OU if their was, it would be the biggest news story in the world.
This information has been on the Internet for long enough now

Yes Aaron should send the circuits to universities, as the circuit made by his hand's  and his hand's only
produce OU, or so it would seem

All I am asking at the very least is send one working circuit to OU.com

I know your answer will be NO  however you go round the houses to get their, it will be NO
it is the same as does the circuit produced OU   NNNNNOOOOO

prove me wrong with action not words
               cat

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi Cat,  Your comment that if it were OU it would be the biggest story in the world.  Indeed.  So you explain it.  Going back to the quantum article while it was still hot off the press - we were asked to demonstrate it at MTN Sciencentre.  At the time there was an international conference for physicists being held at the centre.   We were there for at least 5 days.  It may have been 7.   The existence of the apparatus and its accessibility was well published.  Not ONE person came up to see a demo.

So.  Have we got OU?  Possibly on Aaron's negative current.  On the published test - definitely NOT.  And to determine the level of efficiency that is realised on our published circuit - here's the thing.  We're flirting on either side of 1.  On the crude apparatus that is being used - that's extraordinary.  One would expect hefty losses in all the wiring required for appartus that is subjected to testing for proof of concept.  Spice suggests maximum efficiency at a projected best of 86% I think it is.  But no-one - thus far - has factored in the energy expended on RF.  That will take it way over COP>1.  That, in itself, is of interest.  So.  You tell me why everyone is so entirely 'underwhelmed'.

And for the record - no-one, so far, has evaluated the energy expended in RF - nor even referenced it.  Why?