Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[BEP]

I'm not saying he should place the light source my way. I'm saying my way is how I've done it while checking a large (not much deflection due to gravity) rotating metal disc.
For him to match my method he would need to place a mirror in the exact center. The laser would then be on a separate stand pointing at that centered mirror. My experience mentioned is with rotating table aligment and deflection tests.

When doing so the same +/- shift is seen when little to none is expected. Therefore, when the table rotates about a vertical plane nothing special must be done. When the table rotates about a horizontal plane the results must be averaged for multple radial positions.

Then you repeat the tests later in the day and the average is the same but every reading is different.

Makes me wonder about gravity lensing and Coriolis for small scales. Wouldn't it you?

It makes me wonder if there will be any expected results from the spaceborn tests - at least not what they expect to confirm, without rotating that huge triad.
In other words, if gravity is a wave it is a spin wave. 

[BEP]

As far as the inquistion goes - I am normally a victim of one rather than a participant.

[BEP]

BTW:
Before I go back to more laser work - the shitfts seen as described above indicate that disc elongates into an ellipse when the opposite beams are almost 45 deg. To the horizon.

[poynt99]

And I hope Poynt takes due note of the difference between the two Tektronix instruments. 

Naturally, there are differences. Specifically, what are you referring to?

.99

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi Poynt.  It seems we're going to keep you on this side of the argument?      I'll answer your last question if you'll first answer mine?  I think that's fair.