Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[poynt99]

OK, I hope it feels better now that you've taken the plunge. Although it's not becoming imo.

I welcome open and meaningful communication Rose. If you want to "really communicate" try me I may capitulate.

.99

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Poynt - what is unbecoming about open communication on a forum looking to open source technologies for free energy?  I'm puzzled.  I think the stumbling block is in the level of communication.  We on the front lines of free energy technologies take it to appropriate levels - as a rule and as required.  It is you lot - the side troll - that hide everything including your identities, I might add.

[poynt99]

@Glen:

The MOSFET's (IRFPG50 x 2) arrived today...Thanks!

Rating POSITIVE: Well packed (almost too well  ), A1,A+++, seller, will buy again.


Now just need to round up some parts for the PCB, batteries etc, and get this circuit together.

So, regarding your latest results and posts, what was the conclusion you came to regarding energy/heat levels in the circuit etc? Sorry if I missed this, but I can't recall reading about it.

Cheers,
.99

[MileHigh]

.99:

That third clip was great.  I suspect that the FM kind of throws the digital sampling for a loop because the "expected" sampling point has "moved forward" by delta-t if you are increasing in frequency for example.  Your summation of all of the rectangles gets thrown off because of an FM-induced "bunching/unbunching effect."  That's my pet theory.  Nice number crunching scope!

This of course is not a problem with analog integration, there is no sampling clock anymore, you have real time "infinite" sampling going on.

Some people might not realize that a capacitor is a near-perfect integrator, that's simply what it does:  The voltage across a capacitor is the integral of i(t) dt for t = t1 to t = t2.  The operational amplifier converts the input voltage into current which charges or discharges the capacitor, performing a near-perfect analog integration resulting in an output voltage.  You measure that output voltage and that's the DC voltage reading on the digital multimeter.

It certainly is applicable for investigating the "Negative Dominant Waveform" concept.  Never heard of that one myself!  You learn something wrong every day!  lol

Great that you got your MOSETs, onwards and upwards!

Rosemary:

I am done with the interferometer.  It's amazing how the pie-in-the-sky theories have been percolating up about that.  It's all a road to nowhere.

So I was a bit naughty about the "wrong learning."  Unfortunately it is true.  I shudder thinking about the young impressionable 13-year-olds reading this stuff.  lol

MileHigh

[fuzzytomcat]

@Glen:

The MOSFET's (IRFPG50 x 2) arrived today...Thanks!

Rating POSITIVE: Well packed (almost too well  ), A1,A+++, seller, will buy again.


Now just need to round up some parts for the PCB, batteries etc, and get this circuit together.

So, regarding your latest results and posts, what was the conclusion you came to regarding energy/heat levels in the circuit etc? Sorry if I missed this, but I can't recall reading about it.

Cheers,
.99

Hi .99

I glad to see you got your Mosfets .... I started to worry there 

As for the "Ainslie - Murakami Negitive Dominant Waveform Generator" the only slight heating I saw was using my 10 ohm 100 watt "Memcor" resistor and only minor increases. The fine tuning of the circuit using the Tektronix TDS 3054C there was no actual heat increase worth really recording. I wish possibly having more time using the Tektronix TDS that better results could have been made but only having a total of about twelve hours I was limited to what is posted, but better results could have been made "I'm Positive" given some more time. I also left my prototype 10 ohm resistor ( I'll make another for myself) with Aaron and hopefully he might have the time to try some replications of the replication using this "odd acting" component to see what the results are prior to the oscilloscope being returned to Tektronix, but there again hopefully Aaron and Energetic Forum may be fortunate again to be allowed to keep it for another 30 days .....

The "Rosemary Anislie COP>17 Heater Circuit" that uses the 24 volt two (2) 12 volt "Liquid" lead acid 10-12 Ah batteries with the 555 circuit component value changes, that's where the heat is on components and I'm still pondering on how to record all the data accurately making or starting some kind of standard (Aaron has made a .xlm chart) so it can be repeated by other replicators with little real $$$ cost.

Fuzzy