Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[Yucca]

It´s all too funny. Rosemary is always contradicting herself like this lol:

With the utmost respect to TK I am not inclined to trust his impartiality

How can a flim flam carpetbagger such as rosemary attract such ardent followers? They´re just setting themselves up for a fall? Is it because she applied for a patent? Woopity f*kn doo! so anyone can spend a small amount of money for a patent app and then thy´re the messiah! She´s not the messia, she´s just a very naughty girl!

Plus aaron clearly does not respect equipment or measurement, his scope was on the floor and I don´t know if anyone else noticed but his scopes trace rotation was not even straight. I couldn´t sleep if my scope was on the floor, let alone if the trace rotation wasn´t spot on!

Also the load being inductive has storage capability (as TK already said wayback, aaron removed the ytube comment) but aaron seems to think that every joule that goes into that load will be dissipated and he thinks any kickback is free energy.... jeez as you said TK, for chrisakes don´t try and explain power factor to them.

[jibbguy]

Lol i've seen $100,000 instruments propped up on a dirty concrete floor in front of a power cabinet. In the real world they are just tools to do your job, not something to revere like a jade idol.

Power Factor in a pulse DC circuit? Regarding spikes charging a battery and generating heat in a resistor? Interesting. Would like to see how that matters a tinker's damn.

If this circuit efficiently heats up the resistive element as reported, i don't think anyone will give a hoot if some here disapprove of the "improper" use of inductive spikes

General interest in this circuit is growing, along with replication attempts... Despite the ad hominem nonsense and irrational, premature negativity we have so often seen here in this thread. 

[Asymatrix]

Lol i've seen $100,000 instruments propped up on a dirty concrete floor in front of a power cabinet. In the real world they are just tools to do your job, not something to revere like a jade idol.

Power Factor in a pulse DC circuit? Regarding spikes charging a battery and generating heat in a resistor? Interesting. Would like to see how that matters a tinker's damn.

If this circuit efficiently heats up the resistive element as reported, i don't think anyone will give a hoot if some here disapprove of the "improper" use of inductive spikes

General interest in this circuit is growing, along with replication attempts... Despite the ad hominem nonsense and irrational, premature negativity we have so often seen here in this thread.

Seems like the only interest being generated is why anyone still thinks this circuit produces OU. Rosemary can't even pull it out of the closet to test it, or even show it, in spite of the fact that there is more discussion about it now than there has ever been. And she obviously did not use the ultra expensive digital sampling equipment you mentioned when originally testing, so that point is moot.

[Yucca]

Lol i've seen $100,000 instruments propped up on a dirty concrete floor in front of a power cabinet. In the real world they are just tools to do your job, not something to revere like a jade idol.

I have worked as an embedded software engineer in the "real world" for over 10 years, I have seen quite a few dropkicks who do not appreciate equipment, but then I have seen many more engineers who realise that equipment is as important as ones eyes and as such they keep it accurate and usually on a bench. Of course in field situations sometimes you have to put a scope on asphalt, grass or dirt. It´s just quite telling about a persons priorities with regard to measurement when in a domestic situation the scope is on the floor, no ad hominen intended, it´s just something I wouldn´t do, I´m sorry if I upset you with my metrological fascism. Love and light

Power Factor in a pulse DC circuit? Regarding spikes charging a battery and generating heat in a resistor? Interesting. Would like to see how that matters a tinker's damn.

Rosemarie always talks of aperiodic hartley oscillation, any oscillatory component will have power factor in it.

A pulsed load that has an inductive element will interacts with the capacitance inside of itself and the rest of the circuit, this results in oscillation (termed ringdown), unless of course you´ve got your magic hartley oscillation which might be far more magnificent and then you can ignore the ringdown and just concentrate on that primarily.

Every oscillation, in case your not aware, has to be analysed taking PF into account, best way would be a really low ohm purelely resistive element in series with the load, observing across the load and the R using a scope. But don´t worry, simply calorimetry will expose any OU characteristics using nice and simple methods, so no need to worry over such matters to prove Rosemaries concept should it be valid. Of course deep digging engineers would cover PF ground just to get a better undertstanding of any anomoly should it arise.

If this circuit efficiently heats up the resistive element as reported, i don't think anyone will give a hoot if some here disapprove of the "improper" use of inductive spikes

"If" being a very axiomatic point.

General interest in this circuit is growing, along with replication attempts... Despite the ad hominem nonsense and irrational, premature negativity we have so often seen here in this thread.

Yes, it´s all good carry on.

I have nothing against drilling deep into the analysis of pulsed DC systems, and I´m not saying there may not be some magical stuff to see when you do drill deep, but it irks me when people talk beyond the data and prop up a folly they have gathered around for god knows what reason.

One thing I will say is this, I consider myself a fairly impartial observer and have read every post in this thread as well as energetic forum thread. It is absurdly clear to me where any ad hom started. It seems that any question that threatens the "status quo" is met with an overly defensive response, one has to wonder why?

Also If I ever thought TK to be in gross error I would not hesitate to voice my opinion and if I was (through logical discourse i.e. debate) correct then I´m certain TK would not hesitate to acknowledge his error without too much drama, as would I, that´s one thing about being an engineer; leave your ego at the door and only "worship" real data.

Follow the one thing we might all share in common, the truth discovered by real observation, or follow whatever else you wan´t, I´m not to bothered either way.

[ramset]

WELL ...
I am sure proud of you guys ,and I know not one of the posters here
is insincere in their quest
BUT    6 weeks 35,000 views[both forums] on a circuit that has not been posted

The Boss would have our ass in a sling !!
TK
I wouldn't want to have to hand your bill to the Boss Geeeesh

I'm sure glad O C is only a paper boss [although he does sound pissed]

It continues......