Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[verpies]

You used the example of nuclear reactors. Why don't you try to replicate that? Hmm a bit too dangerous?

Nuclear reactors are not the issue here - The Yoke device is.
Anyway, the rectors have already been replicated and openly documented many times by their authors, despite their inherent dangers.
Nuclear reactors use much scarcer materials than the Yoke and are prohibitively expensive, too.

You say energy but you really mean current don't you?

No, I mean energy, just as I wrote.

To have energy you must have voltage and current.

That's true only for electrical energy. Voltage and current must be present at the same time for a duration greater than zero, to represent energy.

All of the above does not justify the abandonment of the Yoke device.

My final word to you verpies is stop banging the numbers and start helping with getting a system that works first.

What is the system "that works"?
Do you mean the HV tubular devices, discussed for the last 200 pages or the Yoke device abandoned 200 pages ago?
If it is the latter, then you won't get any argument from me.  My Reply #9509 was exactly this attempt to help with the apparently working system.

Anytime you say anything it is always whats the in/out...

_{...or a self-runner.}
Of course - Few numbers are better than gobs of imprecise words. Otherwise how can an OU device be distinguished from a sparking toy that consumes more energy than it produces?
Words are not the measure of efficiency (e.g. COP) - numbers are.

Build it for yourself then you can demand numbers at will. Otherwise why don't you become productive and not impinge on the ones looking to explain this Kapanadze system or even the yoke.

I am not going to build sparking toys that show no evidence of OU because it is a sheer waste of time and resources.

The crux of the matter is that these toys distract everybody from the real McCoy that showed true OU evidence and much future potential (much cheaper than nuclear reactor, too )

[verpies]

.

[ronotte]

Hi all,
this is what appears to be the final of my own Autogenerator replication. After careful trimming of components , resonance and methodology I've got some useful numbers. The device still need more power than it produces. Anyway big improvements I did, so at least my impression is that using the kacher implementation in the same core of HV transformer could really develop the useful gain. In fact I've not been able to further increase the RF in this last setup.
The voltage across lamp's load is now 370Vpp. The 50Hz wave has superimposed about 160V of 780Khz induced by the kacher. The combined effect: the 120VAC (coming from tr1) and the kacher ionization & induction is stunning! the voltage skyrocket to 370Vpp. You can appreciate the visual effect from the first two pictures.
The voltage impressed on lamp load is in third picture.
On next picture is the AC logger with reading corresponding to all in operation.Last pic is for the updated schematic rev. 2.2
Roberto

[verpies]

Where is the schematic diagram for this ronotte's HV resonator that looks like a Tesla coil?

[jbignes5]

 We need to start testing the 1/4 wave folded version for the katcher. What I think is happening is it is increasing the pressure on the folded end and this nets a better spin to the field.


For those who don't understand the spark gap, you should really think about the device. The spark gap is only two things. Conditioning space for the pulse on and to get a pulsing conduction and timing of that conduction. Thats the only reason the spark gap is used at all. Paired with a good capacitance to discharge the resulting pulse is amplified. When you put that pulse into the bifilar coil(Tesla method with only the resistance of the wire itself.) You can apply a pulse to the katcher coil that can be very very impressive through induction.


It's all about the surface area of the conductors you choose. Higher surface area means more voltage when the mass is the same. Also the focus part of the energy when higher voltages are present allow for another gain. This has been proved by Tesla as well. The experiments have been done already yet some seem to think nothing of it.


Reference:  https://www.teslashop.us/mall/more/313irw.htm

"The luminous intensity of the streams is, of course, considerably increased when they are focused upon a small surface.  This may be shown by the following experiment."
Even though he is talking about luminosity it is still an increase in the output none the less.

Reference: http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/1892-02-03.htm


Read all of the references I provide please. It tells of some of the finer points of this process.