Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[a.king21]

TK has done an experiment on an island.
No electricity supply within a mile.

[x_name41]

V8Karlo, maybe if you increase the input voltage and capacity of the capacitor with air core? because if use ferrite output voltage increased very high...

[iflewmyown]

Also I have read in two places the city government shut down one half of the city he was demonstrating in to detect power theft. Seems a lot of people jumping in trying to derail this...

[starcruiser]

I did cascade two of them. At the end of first put fat electrolyte cap 220uF, 400V , then second mosfet
just like in first one. Problem is if your second circuit stop operating, you have 10-15 second before
220uF, 400V rupture.

The results at output were same as when I use only one device but paralleled 2 Power sources
from PC supply , 2x12V = 24V with same 250mA. Result were almost identical in that two cases.
Without load 1,4A, and I didnt try to gain voltages over 1200V. So , my conclusion for that
case was that there is positive amplification and that capacitive coils are more powerfull than
inductive.

When 220uF, 400V rupture there is loud bang, after that didn't go further in that direction.

Well over voltage of a cap will cause a failure, I would suggest a surge suppressor or arrestor rated to the capacitor voltage to avoid that failure mode.

I was thinking of direct driving the second stage, with no loop back (feed back) to avoid active electronics (MOSFets, etc), this second stage would be air-core to see how it responds.

[yfree]

Hoppy, All,
You are absolutely right. The amount of energy produced by TK devices can only be achieved through reactions in the "deepest hidings of matter".  There should be no doubt that TK devices are real, they are energy converters, not energy creators.
There  were many suggestions on how to approach this problem. The hints came mostly from TK himself (through his videos, not his talk), Wesley, verpies and sometimes myself.
However, there was no discussion in relation to these suggestions. If at all, there was only outright rejection of these ideas.
It is understood that playing with various implementations of back EMF is fun and the results are immediate; the bulbs are shining with reasonable efficiency, the spark-gap is  firing...  Playing with resonance can also be rewarding: e.g. the Tesla coil will produce high voltage, if implemented properly. But without creating conditions that would involve the "hidings", the results will be, as they always have been.
This is not to discourage anyone from experimenting and reporting results, having fun; quite the contrary.
This is about expectations.
P.S. Output voltage and output current have to be measured simultaneously, not separately, to estimate the output power.