Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[jbignes5]

Please revisit and re-read,  my article  at page 940

On that page at the bottom there is long article made by stivep  that is me Wesley
The article  is  signed as Wesley at the bottom of it.
I have made major  additions and corrections to it
Please concentrate on electrostatic resonance


Wesley


Ps:  every article made by  me is signed with my name at the end of it.,( if I did not  forget to do  it)

Yes! Now you are getting there. It seems though the static portion is non organized but the electrostatic portion is a diode like effect that is well organized, hence the electrostatic chuck that is organized to attract like a vacuum or repel with the power of the Universal speed limit, whatever that limit might be.


We know little about this area and actually have mistaken the magnetic force as being the reason for attraction and repulsion, when all along it has been this shunned side of the electrical phenomena. Tesla stumbled onto to it in his High voltage days but I suspect he was only seeing a small percentage of the real power of this stuff.


Take for instance the round conductor example from the book I linked and now merely put our planet in the middle instead of a cut away of a conductor. It's still a conductor but only in the shape of a sphere. If this follows the static rules then the surface is highly charged and the interior is highly without charge or in a vacuum state because matter has displaced space and most of the positive charges in that matter reside on the crust or within 1000 feet of the crust into the matter. This is also because there is a great mass of charge surrounding our planet called the ionosphere. Now I might have it reversed but I think this is a correct as it can get. The air is the dielectric in this case.


Space itself can be concluded that it is a huge spiderweb of electric field with no real current. Hence the reason everything that drops into that space turns absolute zero or near there. This network sucks real charges out of the object draining it of every last ounce of energy because the electric field at that point is super conducting and starved of charges but is also connected to anything in that solar system. This is why we use dielectric layers to hold charges into objects that we put into space including ourselves.


This is just some relative observations about our environment and how it works. It might also be concluded that this field has the ability to suck charges from anywhere the potential is highest in either direction, highest to lowest.


I'm sorry about the references to other things like the planets and solar system it is just easier for me to show you the strength of this field in that way.

[stivep]

quote of myself from page 940
Reply #14097 on:Today at 09:04:18 AM »


I have just noticed something while I was doing another correction to the previous article.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIMa1knlrfA&feature=player_embedded#!
look  at this video first than read the rest

primary question;
is electrostatics dimensional and  how many dimensional it represents?



ONE SIMPLE CONCLUSION FROM ALL THAT IS BELOW
If the electrostatics is able to create mechanical motion That means that molecules of the body and individual atoms of the  body is to be shaken ( moved) I was once saying about hammering effect in the spark gap.
Plasma is hammering spark gap contact and inertia is part of that. I was trying to envision or say picture that mechanism at  last 2 minutes of  video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HKVyeQkW8j0
Well molecules of air are being shaken as well.

But where is interaction creating  FE.
How about if we have vertically placed  capacitor with two  horizontal plates
Lower plate is fixed but upper plate is suspended on the spring..
Would  that  upper  plate jump up down due to electrostatic charge?
And if it would and as second step we make that plate  not to move than what moves?
Something must move?
What the article I brought to your attention says, about monopolar and bipolar  voltages?
And using software to control repulsion ?
The wafer is holding  the  disc , even after charge is removed and there is a need to apply waveform to eliminate the holding force (free the wafer)-  Johnsen-Rahbek  method
And why is that?

Recent change to  article( morning Saturday 9:35 Am EST.
Last change done at 3:27PM )

When, while heaving two  plates of capacitor, one plate is suspended on the spring, than at no electrostatic
charge, dielectric constant of dielectric between plates is Er
But when electrostatic charge deflects upper plate of its position than dielectric constant of the dielectric between plates will change. Er +/-
That will make  capacitance change, and components of series and parallel equivalent circuit including stray capacitance to change..


Someone might say dielectric constant is  unit/ per distance?
Yes But if your dielectric is a foam
than at each position change of your upper plate of C
Compression of foam  changes ................. permitivity and permeability of medium than is changed
-so is in cylinder with piston compressed air.

-so is.............. TK" metal can" of video 2004....... is it??
is it?
is it?



WHAT THE HECK?
WHY TK WAS PLAYING WITH "ELEKTROHYDRAULIK " HYDROELECTRIC VERSION? ?
WHY HE OPPOSED 100mil EURO IF  MY SPONSOR DOES NOT AGREE TO  HYDROELECTRIC VERSION  INSTEAD OF ELECTRIC (WHY TK man, nick name David- said that,"  hydraulic device does nor work without electric")
TK knows  that fool me  around is now  next to impossible.
TK knows that the only way to get some money from sponsor is to present closed metal box standing that this is  hydroelectric  OU.,
The fact is that every device of TK must be somehow "hydroelectric"
that means  contain the same mechanism or the same  concept of operation   hydro or not hydro..








I'm probably over-exaggerating
I'm seeking interaction mechanism with ambient environment to locate OU.
So if I do please  forgive me any possible inconsistency if there is any.

Now you play with magnetic field if you wish.
But aren't we than talking about electrostatic resonance?

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003PhRvL..91y3902F

Fredkin, D. R.; Mayergoyz, I. D.
Physical Review Letters, vol. 91, Issue 25, id. 253902 Resonant behavior of dielectric objects occurs at certain frequencies for which the object permittivity is negative and the free-space wavelength is large in comparison with the object dimensions.

for the rest of it go back  to my article at page 940
Reply #14097 on:Today at 09:04:18 AM »




===========================================================================


responses to  Reply #14112 on:Today at 08:39:42 PM »]
jbignes5

Take for instance the round conductor example from the book I linked and now merely put our planet in the middle instead of a cut away of a conductor. It's still a conductor but only in the shape of a sphere. If this follows the static rules then the surface is highly charged and the interior is highly without charge or in a vacuum state because matter has displaced space and most of the positive charges in that matter reside on the crust or within 1000 feet of the crust into the matter. This is also because there is a great mass of charge surrounding our planet called the ionosphere. Now I might have it reversed but I think this is a correct as it can get. The air is the dielectric in this case.

Brilliant
also skin effect if any is to be accounted for ( AC only)


Reply #14110 on:Today at 08:11:11 PM »
wattsup

From what you have discussed, should I understand that a spark gap does not necessarily have to produce a spark to maintain its intended effect?

Yes I agree depends what effect you have in mind
and man......
I like your contribution to this forum, thank you




Wesley

[verpies]

Please revisit and re-read,  my article  at page 940

I think what Qwert was trying to communicte to you is that page 940 does not exist in this thread with his account settings. 
See the screenshots below:

[verpies]

.

[stivep]

I think what Qwert was trying to communicte to you is that page 940 does not exist in this thread with his account settings. 
See the screenshots below:

Thank you my friend:


articles re-edited:

Please revisit and re-read,  my article  at   page 940
Reply #14097 on:Today at 09:04:18 AM »  

Please revisit and re-read,  my article  at   page 941
Reply #14113 on:Today at 08:50:39 PM

Wesley