Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[wattsup]

@all

Now you guys are getting the hang of it. Asking the questions but being precise on the device physicals for the relationships. That's the only way to attack this.

The two transistors. Why two, when with only one you can pulse a flyback primary until the cows jump over the moon. So why two of such size. Do you need them in cascading mode. Most likely not.

The only main reasons I could think of to use two transistors of that size would be too.....

a) pulse both the negative and positive sides of a primary coil, or,
b) discharge both sides of a capacitor into a load.

For A, the reason to pulse both sides of a coil would be to pulse a primary in a way that you will not have a permanent connection on one side of the coil that produces a constant bias to the negative or to the positive. If both sides are released at the same time, then the flyback will have nowhere to go but out of the coil and be released to the secondary with greater punch.

For B, if you had a way of using simple capacitors and diodes that take an AC signal, send the positive of the wave to one capacitor and send the negative of the wave to another capacitor, that's two caps filled to the voltage peak (not peak-to-peak), that can then be released by the two transistors where the caps are now in series to double the voltage or in parallel to double the amperage.

Naturally as eluded, yes the question about the Tent unit using that bank of capacitors would have to be looked at very closely to see if there are any diodes fixed on those capacitor terminals or if those model of capacitors have built in diodes or any other switching capability creating a cascading effect.

Then on the 2004 TK coil, if it only has two windings as we visually note as follows.

Coil 1 white wired, one side goes to the tin can (1a) while other side goes to earth ground and one side of load (1b).
Coil 2 orange wired, one side goes inside the tin can (2a), while the other side goes straight to load (2b).

So there is something very wrong here.

If we consider that the tin can is negative, then the start of coil 1a is negative but it also ends at 1b as negative as well. But that is totally contrary to all coils that have one polarity on one side and the other polarity on the other side. Why have one coil start and stop as negative? That is the part I do not get. Unless the tin can chassis is positive, goes through the coil 1 and ends as negative as one would expect any coil to be.

So maybe this explains better my "puzzlement".

Now let's take that further. If one side of the load is grounded negative, then the other side has to be positive. If on the other side of load it is positive where it meet the orange coil 2, then on the other side of the coil 2 where it goes inside the tin can, it should be negative. But then why go inside the tin can and not just connect it to the tin can chassis if it is negative.

This all says to me that the TK coil is doing nothing in terms of causing a potential difference from one side to the other of the coil. The TKc is just a nice wound pair of wires that look nice and fancy but do not follow any laws of polarity logic that I know of. More to consider.

Added:

Taking this one step further, the TKc topology confirms to me that the orange wire has to be an AC hot. With the orange wire as AC hot all the above holds true since the grounded side would then become and AC neutral, but that would mean his ground pipe is not a true Earth ground but is spiked with AC neutral, otherwise the logic of the TKc cannot hold true.

wattsup

[Acca]

                        Response to jbignes5
"If we look at induction rules and magnetic rules we see that moving charges are the source of magnetic fields." Not in the Kapanadze device. Ferrite has a different property as wall  neodymium, and terbium. Please look up Terfenol-D as it has an megneto-strictive property very close to non conductive ferrite. that ferrite was taken from the Russian TV's and made in to the round generators last year..

Here is a link to a German Bonn University listing "new" magnetic domains as well as my latest clip of magnetic spin on YouTube.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGQK5IQG7EM&feature=plcp

http://www.hikari.uni-bonn.de/research/multiferroics
http://www.hikari.uni-bonn.de/research/publications


 

[xenomorphlabs]

@all

Now you guys are getting the hang of it. Asking the questions but being precise on the device physicals for the relationships. That's the only way to attack this.

The two transistors. Why two, when with only one you can pulse a flyback primary until the cows jump over the moon. So why two of such size. Do you need them in cascading mode. Most likely not.

The only main reasons I could think of to use two transistors of that size would be too.....

a) pulse both the negative and positive sides of a primary coil, or,
b) discharge both sides of a capacitor into a load.

Hey Wattsup,
in case you are not familiar with the symmetric transistor topology in a class B push pull amplifier, here a diagram
One transistor for each half wave. Such set-up could be used in an inverter circuit, but would develop quite a bit of heat
(thus heat-sinks)

[jbignes5]

Saint Buzz thinks Zeitmaschine is the only one that gets it - he draws a picture for the rest.

The displacement current acts like a bellows to accelerate the current flow. Electricity is mass to atomic energy conversion and the faster you accelerate it, the more you make. They falsely claim that an imaginary and invisible photon is the force carrier of the electromagnetic force so that they don't have to account for the acceleration of voltage from the speed of a generator magnet to the speed of light. That proves my point that it is mass to atomic energy conversion through Ahanarov Bohm oscillations. This is the reason that an unbound particle called neutronium is produced starting around >43 KV. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutronium

As Einstein stated "Not everything that counts is countable". You will never be able to measure the missing mass. There is an endless supply of energy in mass since it pulls more matter from the Universe when needed. That is difficult for people to understand if they bought into the point particle physics model. Tesla knew what a particle actually is in reality, so does TheBuzz.


Saint Buzz return to the heavens to bask in the glorious light emanating from the red faced spooks.

Ok then you will admit that you can not have a current if nothing is there to have those currents? The field is not current. Current are only real matter getting potentialized and move accordingly to areas either higher in potential or lower in potential. The field must be first then currents can flow.


Check this guy out and look at the evidence he provides for a much simpler explanation using Occam's razor.




Plasma Physics:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8tqgntbjyE&feature=g-high-rec

[pix]

@ Zeitsmachine
Please notice that in Tesla's "oil bath transformer" - the primary of HV transformer is fed via two capacitors.So there is not conduction current at work.In fact, there is a "break" in the current path.
In "hairpin"- ends of stout bars are connected to one side of capacitors, the other sides of capacitors have voltage alternations from high side of transformer. So there is a displacement current in capacitors at work, not conduction current.
It is like pushing elastic membranes at both ends of pipe- creates pressure gradient inside that pipe.
When you have pressure gradient- then you have gas flow.
When you have potential gradient ( dipole)- then you have current flow.

Regards,
Pix