Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[NoBull]

Take a look this message.
It contains a really good argument about Kapanadze's Faraday Cage as shielding from the radiation of his devices.

[forest]

Hello to all,

I really do think I have the answer to the TK device. Two words.. Resonance and Symmetry. And it IS so simple you would laugh! It even incorporates Zeitsmaschine's beloved Faraday cage

And to all who scoffed at jbignes5, sorry it is Tesla Tech!! It is basically Tesla's Radiant energy transformer.

Mr forest has been dropping tantalising clues in my direction for weeks now, and yes, I did see your post that you subsequently removed!!

Right, the answer, however the practical side will be a lot more difficult to achieve than the solution!!!

The Primary is a Resonant Tesla coil radiating energy. Now we all know that in any transformer circuit whatever you extract from the secondary it is always reflected back to the Primary. That is effectivley destroying the Symmetry. This is not what we want!! With great thanks to Ganzha and forest, I was able to put the whole thing together.

In order not to destroy the Primary's Symmetry, Tuned secondary coils, ( remember TK's patent notes, First bobbin. Second bobbin.)  placed nearby pick up the Radiant energy and by the use of Zeitmaschine's metal box intensify the current.

As you can see there is nothing new about this, Hubbard, Don Smith The old scientist etc etc.

But as I said earlier the practical will be a tougher challenge all together!!

Watch this again.....  http://youtu.be/r4dP1IF70a8   A solid state Tesla coil with an output spark that looks like a candle flame. I have never achieved any thing that looks like that!!! Could someone persuade him to part with the primary drive's circuit diagram?

Any way I have given you plenty of .308's, start Sniping!!!

To jbignes5, please reconsider your situation, I have found your insight refreshing, and remember " Nill carborundum illegitimo" " Don't let the b______'s grind you down"

Cheers to all Grum.

Well, I think you got it.... but x_name41 statement has also a merit - like Don Smith said once : you have to have energy here to see it, you have to keep 5kW in resonance to get it out. Funny enough ?

I have done various experiments proposed by Jack NoSkills and while I didn't found free energy , because I'm not EE or educated enough , I realized that something is very bad with current view of resonant circuits.
Everybody told me you cannot tap energy from resonant circuit, yet with carefully matched elements I can "simulate" OU with just one or two transformers and a load with stable resistance and no inductance.
This "simulated" OU (I call it such because it works only with very stable elements and every change in setup breaks effect) is by two resonant circuits : an isolation  transformer + capacitor (parallel resonant circuit) + 50Hz pure sinewave input source (inverter) on primary side and also parallel resonant circuit on secondary side with load (pure resistance small bulb (have to measure resistance after some time to warm filament) or just a led lamp). With careful matching you have a circuit with much less power consumption then indicated by rules.

That was first I wanted to describe to Grumage and all, but I'm not and educated EE so please bear with me. This however told me that the only reason we can't have OU is because : first we use symmetry wrongly without understanding induction laws, second and more difficult to grasp : induction laws HAVE to match Newton laws .

In case of transformer this tells me (even if you think I'm crazy) : on secondary side we have a COPY of energy stored by us in primary side, equal and opposite.

Before you dismiss this theory as impossible , think about one consequence : in such case we still have in common transformer  only COP<1 because of symmetry we use. So , if I'm correct we have our OU right before our eyes , yet using current view on induction laws is enough because we have not evolved our circuits to use better symmetry (due to misunderstanding or induction maybe).



The reactive power I talked about is always in our circuits to shake them mechanically, to heat them and to radiated RF because IT IS NOT TRANSFORMED INTO SECONDARY. It doesn't need to be (in such case where would be the reaction force ? remember.. equal and opposite....). It tries to leak out or return back to power supply even in AC systems, because everywhere are resonant circuits even created momentarily 

End of crazy talk (my english is too limited to put it simpler). I removed my posts because nobody likes to be treated as a madman...

Grumage , you mentioned your tests with transformer, can you elaborate more ?

[verpies]

@Wesley

Are you sure that the EM radiation from your RF transmitter does not influence your ionizing radiation meter (milliroentgen/h meter) directly ?

My 75W transmitter wreaks havoc with most of my test equipment when it is radiating RF nearby.  (even shielded instruments are affected significantly).  Are your instruments immune to RF EMI ?

Also did you do anything to differentiate between the beta or gamma ionizing radiation that your Radiacmeter is registering allegedly?

[Zeitmaschine]

so it might be worth building this up to see how it performs as there could just might be something interesting to be found with this arrangement.

Don't forget the Faraday cage to incorporate.

Anyway, who finds out what's actually in the Stepanov transformer boxes (Russian standard transformer as it seems)? It could be very beneficial to know the exact specifications about what's in there. How does this transformer transform when it is used the standard way? Is it step-up or step-down? Or is this an insulation transformer? With or without tapping? Are there build-in thyristors by default?

Are the two capacitors connected outside because there is no room within the box or because it will not work when those capacitors are inside the box (Faraday cage)?

But at least I don't think there is a Tesla coil inside or a spark gap or high voltage or some other fancy materials. Looks indeed very simple.

[DreamThinkBuild]

Hi All,

This patent application recently appeared on the radar.

NON-MOVING PART OR STATIC ELECTRIC GENERATOR
http://www.google.com/patents/US20120169138