Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[baroutologos]

Good job Netics at proposing plain circuits for detecting radiation. I am sure they are many improvised on the net also, that make use of GM tubes. (I saw that GM can be sold - plain tubes - cheaply in ebay but do not understand yet their technology)


This is a encouraging step for those who understand how to make and use powerful RF and are willing to try stimulate B-radiation on substances that are inert in usual circumstances. Having that draft radiation detector handy will tell, especially if some serious radiation occurs.


...


@stivep,


Nice job so far. Have you yet try to replicate your experiments in other setup? I mean larger tube hence more powder, under magnetic influence of some short maybe etc. Repetition is the mother of knowledge after all.

[Zeitmaschine]

GM tube wrapped in aluminum foil and encased in a thin stainless steel tube measures Gamma nicely ...even in a garage.
Neutrons are the hard part.  There are gels that develop bubbles inside, in response to neutrons.  I see them on eBay once in a while.  Also a GM tube with Boron might be used, because Boron emits alpha particles, in response to free neutrons.

Just a short interposed question: If the TK device works on nuclear basis (NMR), then why can't I see any detectors for radioactivity (e.g. a Geiger counter) near any of the TK's devices but in one case nothing more than a simple antenna? Seems to me no one was really concerned about radioactive byproducts during the tests of the devices.

Strange ...

[ramset]

Zeitmaschine.

Who knows what "they" have in the Bushes?
Wesley has a bird in hand.............

No ,actually Wesley has the "keys to the city" in his Hand !

You wanna know what to do?
Help him any way you can..............

Thx
Chet

[verpies]

If it can detect muons it will detect neutrons also

You cannot state that analogy because muons are charged particles and neutrons are not.
Muons are much more similar to electrons than neutrons. The major difference between them is that muons are 200 times more massive than electrons.

just You need array of these diodes BPW34 its cheaper than GM tubes
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4636908&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D4636908
BPW34 Commercial p-i-n Diodes for High-Level 1-MeV Neutron Equivalent Fluence Monitoring

"Neutron Equivalent" is not the same as neutron detection, but this seems  a much better example than the previous ones that were predominantly for gamma detection.
I would have to read the whole article about this "Equivalent Fluence Monitoring" to be sure.

[verpies]

If the TK device works on nuclear basis (NMR), then why can't I see any detectors for radioactivity (e.g. a Geiger counter) near any of the TK's devices

NMR usually does not produce any radioactivity.

Seems to me no one was really concerned about radioactive byproducts during the tests of the devices.

Induced transmutation does not have to be noticed by the inventor if he does not realize the modus operandi of his invention.
e.g. He just winds two perpendicular primaries on a suitable core (one fed with RF and the other with DC or LF) and gets those huge pulses induced in the secondary like in the Yoke device.  Later he gets a headache and thinks it's the hangover.

Another possibility: The inventor may deliberately mislead demo-takers about the modus operandi of his device to prevent replication and demo-takers are not diligent enough to take radiation measurements (or the device is shielded in a can).  After all, most "investors" don't even take diligent I/O power measurements.

NMR can be performed inadvertently when RF is crossed with magnetic field (even Earth's field).  It is important to remember that NMR does not mean induced transmutation automatically.