Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 192 Guests are viewing this topic.

grizli

Fore those who want STABLE and CHEAP square wave frequency generator with 50% duty cycle, DO NOT use 555, not even CMOS 555

I just tried cmos 555 and its hard to get above 1.1 Mhz

Cheap PLL VCO HEF4046 works for example very stable up to 2 Mhz. I just tried up to 2Mhz with 0,5% of stability (frequency change) ...

Use 100 K POT for 500kHz to 3Mhz with 56pF cap

Use Higher cap if you want lower frequnencies...
Pins:
3 connect together  with 4, also same point is signal output

between 6 and 7 goes CAP 56pF and Above(main freq cap )

5 and 8 goes to GND

11 and 12 goes together amd to variable POT, other side of pot goes to GND

pin 16 is VCC

Use 100nF caps between Vcc and gnd

Use some kind of mosfet driver TC  4420 or similar, and some kind of fast mosfet,, cause HEF current output is very low..

Check for possible  mistakes here ... use datasheet HEF4046



baroutologos

Hey guys do not hammer all together :P

@ itsu, wattup

of course the 50Hz winidng cannot form alone any resonant effect without any cap added, but as i see it, the overal voltage rise effect that the TK replication team reports simulates an LC resonance mode. Its my view..

@ Verpies
Of course we are not dealing with DC in such systems but the AC seems to me more or less sine wave. So according my poor knowledge, AC voltage of sine wave   = p-pV /(2*1.41). Of course those are rough considerations.

..
Of course i can be wrong here. The overal idea anyway is to have firm power measurments of those SG and eventually make custom inverters and dispense those SG altogether. That way input will be monitored best.

verpies

Yes the 4046 oscillator/PLL is a very versatile and stable circuit.
This is especially true if separate supply lines are used for the 4046 and the MOSFET/driver.


verpies

Quote from: baroutologos on November 06, 2011, 09:59:57 AM
Of course we are not dealing with DC in such systems but the AC seems to me more or less sine wave. So according my poor knowledge, AC voltage of sine wave   = p-pV /(2*1.41). Of course those are rough considerations.

Unfortunately it is not so simple.

1) First of all, the HF is a rectangular waveform
2) Even if the LF is a perfect sinewave and its RMS Voltage is 7V (Vrms = Vpp / 2^0.5) and its RMS current (Irms) is 178mA then the real power in such circuit can be anywhere from 0 Watts to +/- 1.246 Watts, because the phase shift between the current and voltage is wrongly being ignored in the power calculation.

Hope

EE here and still this would be an average watts output of over .6 watts.   This cores physically size and shape doesn't matter as much as it is a conical circle with two halves and is of high permeability (you can cut these with a wet tile cutter or take to a tile shop and ask them to cut it).  Wesley has told us of the wave collision and timing to obtain this, I have ordered a PCSU1000 (ouch!) and on Ebay at $319.00 plus shipping it is a good investment.  You may also need a PCGU1000 Signal generator  at around $190.00 USD. (Thank you Steven).   Right now we are at the ground floor of invention of course and no solid formula's are known.  We as enthusiasts are having a difficult time in that having to have test equipment is costly.  But as an electronics engineer I would encourage those who can make the commitment to do so and secure the necessary equipment to advance this project.  With enough data from the forum we can build the correct formulas to be able to computer model these WORKING devices.  In this way we will be able to help our fellow forum members build their own working generators without the expense of the equipment we now need.  After leaving the work force to care for my 83 year old father I didn't have access to this much needed instrumentation equipment but find the cost of the PCSU1000 a good value.  Besides it is also the same USB Multi-function O scope one of the Wesley group used to get his device working and that is a good selling point to me on this project.  We have apparently pick-up at least one troll on this topic and perhaps more, this is a great indication of the viability of the device's COP > 1 ability.   If you just get discouraged then the adversary has won another easy battle and will keep us enslaved to the power structure as JP Morgan intended.  Have heart and perseverance and we shall win the day!  This computer collision waveform in the 7600 cps area is half the n. resonance approx.  See the Free Energy Surprise documents to understand what success that has already met with.  This device many be found later to be slapping the iron atoms into becoming unstable and nature is balancing it with it's infinite pool of energy to re-balance it or decay it into the next element an atom at a time.  I feel this concept we are given from Wesley and his friends is worth our full attention and disregard any disparaging comments from those who are not even willing to commit enough to attempt an build.  Those who would be nay-sayers are welcome to move on to what they feel are more fertile areas of endeavor.  Let's build a future and be remembered, not destroy and be forgotten.  And I congratulate Wattsup of his crisp willingness to build and learn.  And again I echo a very large THANK YOU to the members here and the Wesley group for your efforts to free mankind from BIG OILY!!

Edited a few times! Re edited yet again.