Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[Shokac]

shem....

www.freeenergylt.narod2.ru/lithuania_experiment/..

Thank you for using my approach!

The only thing missing is a constant source of VOLTAGE  (sugest 220V or 110V from inverter)!!!!

[baroutologos]

I was playing around with a ETD-49 ferrox cube, and trying via different methods to see if it has any "singing frequency".
After many attempts and excluding variables, i found out it does not show any to my o-scope.

....
One usuful practice i employed (and oftenly suggested) is to use High voltage and a spark gap, without any capacitance added (so as not to be noisy and not intermmitently firing at low frequency) with application of very fast low capacitance  HV diodes (so as to constrict oscillations between the investgated object and the inverter source).

That way, a smoothing constantly discharging spark gap (mine operates at 25 khz as the inverter) is able to produce a "white noise", able to resonane (and an o-scope to see) any LC component indcutively or so coupled or even ring  a ferrite core. (if can be ringed)

Very useful.

[verpies]

verpies, you can not win, it useless to prove anything to uneducated people,
let them play their game, they're very-very wanting to be on the top of the world - "working OU", it's not OU, and it's not working, and it will never be, and it's not me or you, it's a Physics;
so just don't waste your time, it's useless, some of them already know it but just don't want to admit it.

Hope, it's open forum, you can agree or not, who cares, you like it - so, it's you, but you can't change mind of others, can you .
Don't bother to answer, cuz I won't reply,  I'm just supporting those who has a clear mind.

I don't care about winning.
I just want to have my engineering questions answered. I want clear tuning instructions without ambiguities and in clear English.

I recently noticed that other people's questions are being answered even if they are not technical, yet answers to my questions are avoided.
Thus I am speaking up.

AGAIN:
Q1) WHAT ARE THE CREDIBLE INPUT & OUTPUT POWER MEASUREMENTS of the SAAAR Tube device? 

Note that:
1) Maximum power ratings of transformers are not indicative of power being transferred through a transformer (albeit they might establish loose upper limits of that power if the waveforms transferred are at the rated frequency and shape).
   a) Maximum power ratings of transformers at different frequencies than the operating one (and different waveform shapes than the rated one) do not constitute a valid power limit for that transformer.
2) Average current measured by a ammeter/multimeter does not constitute power.
   a) Furthermore AC Current measured by an ammeter whose maximum frequency rating is below the frequency of the measured current is not credible.
3) Average voltage measured by a voltmeter/multimeter does not constitute power.
   a) Furthermore AC Voltage measured by a voltmeter whose maximum frequency rating is below the frequency of the measured voltage is not credible.
4) Credible Average Current multiplied by Credible Average Voltage does not constitute Power for non-DC waveforms.  Sorry guys, 1 Amp * 1 Volt  = 1 Watt is true only for non-pulsating DC current.
   a) Credible RMS current multiplied by Credible RMS Voltage does not constitute Power for non-DC waveforms. 
5) The power rating of a light bulb does not constitute power
   a) An incandescent 100W bulb can be lit with 20W of power or 130W of electric power.  The latter is not good for it but a high quality bulb will last for hours in such overdriven condition.
6) The brightness of an incandescent light bulb is a good indicator of dissipated power (especially if the bulb does not have a coiled filament), however:
   a) Unquantifiable bulb brightness is not credible. To be quantifiable the brightness must be measured by a monotonic optical sensor such as photodiode, phototransistor or photoresistor isolated from ambient light. The brightness calibration should be done with known DC current.
   b) A video camera with a variable position, variable ambient lighting and an automatic aperture, is not a credible bulb brightness sensor.

Answering Q1 in a scientific and professional manner will moot the question below:

What are these components in this power Supply?
Items 1 and 2 look like high power transformers (maybe 70 Watts judging by eye).

Q2) What are the TRUE/FALSE answers to the blue disambiguation question in my  TuningInstructions.doc  document regarding the STAAAR Yoke device ?
Q3) Does the STAAAR team agree with the blue disambiguation statements in my  TuningInstructions.doc  document regarding the STAAAR Yoke device ?


NOTE:
The above is not a call for personal Tech Support. The answers to these questions should be published for all to see and  to help all with replication attempts.

[verpies]

@stivep
On the video you looked at the meter reading at 30 with it set at 500mA, and you said it was reading 15mA.
I was referring to your statement.  The meter was reading 150mA and not 15mA. 
I know that the power supply consumes wattage and that the actual input to the flyback will be a lot less. 
It just sounded like you where miss reading the meter, that is why I made the comment.

Yes in the video at 12:29 the current reading is 30% * 500mA = 150mA
Anyway, how do you understand this measurement?  Where is this current being measured?  What is it supposed to be indicative of ?

[Hope]

I believe they initially had success but in the event that the ferrite was becoming a magnet it was loosing it's ability to switch off. Iron would totally fill this bill. When I find the name of this iron Tesla gave Westinghouse we will be on the money. I bet silicon Iron would be the best? The odd thing is Tesla said this was foreign iron from Italy or somewhere like that and that it was soft Iron.


Any radiation from the iron would mean resistance in the iron. This needs to be heat-sinked with an aluminum case. We want to contain the vortex and the current will flow through the motor. we can also tailor the receiver coils to the shape of the vortex. Resonance must also be included in the geometry of this coil to field relation and might include a Rodin type geometry relation to the fields.


Don't waste you time on people who don't grasp the effects we are playing with here. They will never understand this process unfortunately and will always attack it. It's better to keep the course and slowly learn from your mistakes.


The core was at fault plain and simple. Once it heated up the material started to become ferromagnetic. No problem. Now take that effect and apply it to iron which is less permanent. With layering you can add a capacitance to the core.  Although for basic study Tesla said it was OK to use solid cores. They still worked.

Excellent ideas,  I too believe a wave collision enacting upon a Rodin coil will give the greatest power with the least loss to heat.