Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 133 Guests are viewing this topic.

flathunter

Quote from: JuJu on July 01, 2010, 09:49:00 PM
hi guys,

just want to share the new video of mopozco, A on the kapagen, he tested ground also!

with or without coils, the values are exactly the same, and this is for the one that wrote the Load will never work only with MOT and spark gap, without coil!

Input: 112VAC X 20A = 2240W  for
Output: 1100VAC X 1A = 1100W ,
about 49% efficient.

he also use a light dimmer to reduce the consumption!

quote from mopozco "Better a bitter truth than a sweet lie"...

http://www.youtube.com/comment_servlet?all_comments=1&v=twsRjADmxzE

cheers

Thanks JuJu.  So there are at least 3 people with real kapagens who are reporting that they get the same effect without their kapagen coil.  The MOT is enough.  (could do with a few more videos from replicators trying this.  with kapacoil and without - the more experimental results the better)

I have found exactly the same with my 12V input kapagen.....but im still hopeful that this is a case of tuning/tinkering/altering etc....and then we'll have something close to the genuine article. I can only see JL Naudins (and a couple of other professionals on youtube) who seem to have a convincing case of more out than in.  But i would love to see a video of Naudin removing his kapacoil, and showing us result on the load, with some more input output comparisons.

By the way:  I saw one guy who had his Kapacoil oriented north south.  Is this necessary??  Has anyone else tested various orientations??  I just never heard about this till i saw the video.

baroutologos

@Bolt,

Man Your sayings make no sense to me. Hundred amps at any phase (out or in with voltage) will cause any resistor to blow up. Obviously it does not happen. IF Radiant energy was RF, then we have 1000 devices by now. Not the case. Something different must consists the OU devices i guess.

@Grizly,

Perfect Tesla coils, have SAME amperage both bottom, middle and top. No variations. In reality this does not happen as the distributed capacitance of the coil leads to diminishing amperage (since it charges) while going up. That's the reason is preferable to have a large capacitance topload. To have an continuous amperage rate at all coil and furthermore a greater amperage this way.
Your calculations may be correct. I did not proof read them. Tesla in his Last resonantor Patent of electricity transfer (Magnifier) said by making this unit as described large amperage is secure in and out of the earth. And millions of horse power can develop that unit.

Power, not energy. If you put lamps at the bottom, as Tesla did, the energy is diminished and oscillations dimish consequently.
That's the reason Tesla proposed coil emerged in liquid air, to reduce losses and increase Q. If energy was produced, then why to diminish losses? (resistance further) 

Acca

Below is a re-post from ARON on the energetic forum, as he has so elegantly described of what is taking place on my scope, I give him praise for his narrative theory and the most enlightening simplified description as to what is really going on in the Kapagen device.

Posted are three screen shots of  a scope wave forms from the KapaGen device, what you will see are simple vertical spikes as sampled from the input to the first ground from the MOT, and the load across the halogen lamps.  I have added three more 2KV caps in series, this increased my voltage spikes to a higher level as shown. The spark gap is now copper and carbon, with a distance of .025 mm. I also had to reduce the voltage to the Kapagen so I would not damage my scope. What you see is what you get…More testing to follow…

Acca…

This is from Aron..

"Spike thing is just another way of increasing voltage and lower the current.

The current is "almost" zero in the spike so the energy in the spike is not higher than the energy in the coil before shutoff.

Anyone with a background in electronics that calls the spike the Back EMF doesn't understand the distinction and if this is what is conventionally being taught, then it is flat out wrong.

Energy that went into the coil is coming back as a spike because it is time compressed. The aether provides a free inwards push on anything displacing it. So when a coil is charged, this free inwards push is what is snapping the potential back to the coil on disconnect so fast virtually with no opposition. And, while it snapped back, it creates a true vacuum meaning it is free of positive potential that can cause resistance and this sucks in more energy from the vacuum with it adding to the potential....so there is a gain in potential by this mechanism. The inward snap of the potential causes a negative pressure zone...it sucks in extra potential from the vacuum. This is what the spike is and why it brings back more with it.

None of this is Back EMF and it isn't Forward EMF either.

Getting the voltage potential without the current or bare minimum current...but it is possible to pick off the spike without the current. It isn't simple step up transformation, it is a time rate of change and that is why usually 1:1 turn ratio is used because that is the most efficient for this purpose.

Also, in the spike, energy is almost non-existent, that is why it is called potential or potential energy.

When the voltage potential comes back, it draws more potential to it from the vacuum, adding to the sum of potential, which then gets transferred to a receiver...battery, capacitor, whatever. Once this potential is gathered, it has to go through "forward conversion" then it can move to a lower potential to light a bulb. What was being stored? Time. That is why time (width) doesn't show up on the spike - TIME is being conserved within that voltage potential...you'll see some width if you zoom way in at the bottom but for all pracitcal purposes, it is a spike without current.

The higher the voltage, the higher the pressure and therefore, the more dense the aetheric gas is. The denser the gas, the slower the time because it is all locked up in the density that gives a lot of resistance to mass' ability to move.

Let the time out by making it do work...you get work because you let the time out of the pressure..pressure goes down...the less resistance there is to the movement of mass and therefore, time ticks quicker.

The spike is literally a TIME CHARGE. That isn't an analogy or metahpor...it is TIME POTENTIAL that is being used to charge caps or batteries...that is what the spike is."




Aron
Spiritual Entrepreneur
Energetic Forum, post #84
Back EMF vs. Collapsing Magnetic Field Spike
03-02-2009, 07:12 AM


exnihiloest

Quote from: flathunter on July 02, 2010, 03:38:07 AM
...
But i would love to see a video of Naudin removing his kapacoil, and showing us result on the load, with some more input output comparisons.
...

It would be surely interesting, and also without the spark gap, by replacing it by a direct contact. On my side I saw almost no difference except that the HF radio noise was removed.